Research Article

Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys

Volume: 32 Number: 6 October 8, 2026
EN TR

Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys

Abstract

This study presents a comparative assessment of organic coating systems applied to nano-treated 1050, 5005, and 7075 aluminum alloys, aiming to enhance corrosion resistance in high-performance industrial environments. The alloys were subjected to a zirconium oxide-based nano pretreatment with varying activation durations (60–90 s) and coating times (6–8 min). Subsequently, three distinct organic coating methods were applied: cathodic electrodeposition (CED), powder coating, and zinc flake coating. The performance of the coatings was evaluated using cross-cut adhesion tests, cyclic corrosion tests (EN ISO 11997-1 Cycle B, Renault 47-01-000-E), and copper-accelerated acetic acid salt spray (CASS) tests (DIN 50 021). Coating thicknesses were determined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The findings revealed that zinc flake coatings failed the adhesion tests, whereas CED and powder coatings demonstrated high performance under optimized pretreatment conditions (90 s activation, 8 min nano coating). Notably, the 7075-alloy exhibited superior compatibility across multiple tests, achieving the highest corrosion resistance with CED coatings. These results offer a practical roadmap for selecting environmentally friendly and high-performance coating strategies for aluminum alloys intended for use in harsh service conditions

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Zhou B, Liu B, and Zhang S. “The advancement of 7XXX series aluminum alloys for aircraft structures: a review”. Metals, 11(5), 718, 2021.
  2. [2] Sun Y. “The use of aluminum alloys in structures: review and outlook,” Structures, 57, 105290-105298, 2023.
  3. [3] Joseph R, Davis JR. “Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys”. Ilustrated ed. Ohio, USA, ASM international, 1993.
  4. [4] Ezuber H, El-Houd A, El-Shawesh F. “A study on the corrosion behavior of aluminum alloys in seawater,” Materials & Design, 29(4), 801–805, 2008.
  5. [5] Feng Z, Li J, Ma J, Su Y, Zheng X, Mao Y, Zhao Z. “EBSD characterization of 7075 aluminum alloy and its corrosion behaviors in SRB marine environment”. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(6), 740, 2022.
  6. [6] Liu L, Li Y, Wang F. “Electrochemical corrosion behavior of nanocrystalline materials-a review”. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 26(1), 1-14, 2010.
  7. [7] Udhayakumar M, Radhika N, Arun KL. “A comprehensive review on nanocrystalline coatings: properties, challenges and applications”. Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion, 8, 83, 2022.
  8. [8] Shri Prakash B, Balaraju J N. "Chromate (Cr6+)-free surface treatments for active corrosion protection of aluminum alloys: a review." Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 21(1), 105-135, 2024.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Materials Science and Technologies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 8, 2026

Submission Date

August 25, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 4, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 32 Number: 6

APA
Minaz, C., & Apaydın, F. (2026). Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 32(6), 1146-1154. https://doi.org/10.65206/pajes.41499
AMA
1.Minaz C, Apaydın F. Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026;32(6):1146-1154. doi:10.65206/pajes.41499
Chicago
Minaz, Canberk, and Fatih Apaydın. 2026. “Comparative Performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, Powder, and Zinc Flake Organic Coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 32 (6): 1146-54. https://doi.org/10.65206/pajes.41499.
EndNote
Minaz C, Apaydın F (October 1, 2026) Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 32 6 1146–1154.
IEEE
[1]C. Minaz and F. Apaydın, “Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1146–1154, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.65206/pajes.41499.
ISNAD
Minaz, Canberk - Apaydın, Fatih. “Comparative Performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, Powder, and Zinc Flake Organic Coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 32/6 (October 1, 2026): 1146-1154. https://doi.org/10.65206/pajes.41499.
JAMA
1.Minaz C, Apaydın F. Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026;32:1146–1154.
MLA
Minaz, Canberk, and Fatih Apaydın. “Comparative Performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, Powder, and Zinc Flake Organic Coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 32, no. 6, Oct. 2026, pp. 1146-54, doi:10.65206/pajes.41499.
Vancouver
1.Canberk Minaz, Fatih Apaydın. Comparative performance of Cathodic Electrodeposition, powder, and zinc flake organic coatings on Nano‑Treated AA1050, AA5005, and AA7075 Aluminum Alloys. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026 Oct. 1;32(6):1146-54. doi:10.65206/pajes.41499