Alan Modelinin Politika Kullanılarak Kişiselleştirilmesi

Öz

Günümüzde, çevrimiçi olarak erişilen bilgi üstsel olarak artmaktadır. Bilgi miktarındaki bu artış, kullanıcıların tercihleri ile uyumlu bilgiye etkin bir şekilde erişmesini zorlaştırmaktadır. Bu zorluklar, kişiselleştirme yaklaşımı kullanılarak, bireye özel bilginin ya da servisin sunulması ile aşılabilir. Kişiselleştirme yaklaşımının temeli, kişiye özel bilgiyi temsil eden profil yapısıdır. Kullanıcı-uyarlanabilir bir sistemde, profil tipine özgü bir aramanın sonucunda, kullanıcı ihtiyaçlarına göre kişiselleştirilmiş sonuçlara ulaşılacaktır. Bu çalışmada, kişisel içeriğin sunulması amacı ile anlamsal olarak zengin profiller oluşturulmakta ve geliştirilen kullanıcı profilleri, politikalar ile entegre edilerek kural-tabanlı bir kişiselleştirme sağlanmaktadır. Böylelikle, profili temel alan kısıtlar yardımı ile kişiselleştirilmiş bilgiye erişim etkin bir şekilde gerçekleştirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kişiselleştirme, Kullanıcı modelleme, Profil

Personalizing Domain Model by Using Policy

Abstract

Nowadays, the information that can be accessed online is increasing exponentially. However, this increase in the amount of information brings difficulties to users to access information relevant with their preferences in an effective way. These difficulties could be overcomed with providing customized information or service to an individual by using personalization approach. Profiling is the basis of personalization approach and the representation of person specific information. In a user-adaptive system, personalized results will be reached according to the user’s needs after a profile specific search. In this work, semantically rich profiles are created to present personal context and developed user profiles are integrated with policies to provide a rule-based personalization. Thus, personalized information will be achieved in an effective way through profile based constraints.

Keywords

• -

References

1. Object
2. http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.4.1/ (26 Ekim 2015). Facility (MOF). [2] Brickley D,
3. Friend-of-A-Friend (FOAF).
4. https://www.foaf-project.org (20 Ocak 2014). [3] Kagal L, Finin T, Joshi A. “A Policy Language for a
5. Pervasive Computing Environment”. In IEEE 4th
6. International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems
7. and Networks, 63-74. 4-6 June, 2003. [4] Protégé Ontoloji Editörü. http://protege.stanford.edu/
8. (20 Ocak 2014). [5] FatSecret, Calories Nutrition All Things about food and diet.

9. (20 Ocak 2014). [6] SPARQL Query Language for RDF. Ocak
10. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query 2014). (20 [7] Ameen A, Ur Rahman Khan K, Rani BP. “Semantic Web
11. Personalization: A Survey”. Information and Knowledge
12. Management, 2(6), 95-105, 2012. [8] Baldoni M, Baroglio C, Henze N. “Personalization for the
13. Semantic Web”. In Proceedings of the First International
14. Conference on Reasoning Web (REWERSE 2005),
15. LNCS, (3564), 173-212, 2005. [9] Durao F, Dolog P, Jahn K. “State of the Art:
16. Personalization”. Knowledge in a Wiki Project, 2008. [10] Chen H, Perich F, Chakraborty D, Finin T, Joshi A.
17. “Intelligent Agents Meet Semantic Web in a Smart
18. Meeting Room”. In Proceedings of the 3rd International
19. Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent
20. Systems (AAMAS 2004), Washington DC, USA, 2004. [11] Middleton SE, Shadbolt NR, De Roure DC. “Ontological
21. User Profiling in Recommender Systems”. ACM
22. Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1), 54-88, 2004. [12] Leung KWT, Lee DL, Lee Wang-Chien, “Personalized Web
23. Search with Location Preferences”. IEEE 26th International
24. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Long Beach
25. California, USA. 1-6 March 2010. [13] Skillen KL, Chen L, Nugent CD, Donnelly MP, Burns W,
26. Solheim I. “Ontological User Profile Modeling for Context- Aware
27. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on
28. Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Vitoria
29. Gasteiz, Spain, 3-5 December 2012. UCAmI'12 [14] Tapucu D, Can O, Bursa O, Unalir MO. “Metamodeling
30. Approach to Preference Management in the Semantic
31. Web”. 4th Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in
32. Preference Handling (M-PREF 2008) (In conjunction with
33. AAAI 2008), Chicago, Illinois, USA, 13-14 July 2008. [15] Royer JC, Willrich R, Diaz M. “User Profile-Based
34. Authorization Policies for Network QoS Services”.
35. Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Network
36. Computing and Applications, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
37. USA, 10-12 July 2008. [16] Iqbal Z, Noll J. “Toward User-Centric Privacy-Aware User
38. Profile Ontology for Future Services”. Third International
39. Conference on Communication Theory, Reliability, and
40. Quality of Service (CTRQ), Athens, TBD, Greece,
41. 13-19 June 2010. [17] Agostini A, Bettini C, Cesa-Bianchi N, Maggiorini D, Riboni
42. D. “Integrated Profile and Policy Management for Mobile
43. Oriented Internet Services”. Technical Report Firb-Web
44. Minds N. TR-WEBMINDS-04, Milan, Italy, 2003. [18] Can O, Bursa O, Unalir MO. “Personalizable Ontology
45. Based Access Control”. Gazi University Journal of Science,
46. 23(4), 465-474, 2010, [19] Uszok A, Bradshaw JM, Jeffers R. “KAoS: A Policy and
47. Domain Services Framework for Grid Computing and
48. Semantic Web Services”. In Trust Management
49. (iTrust 2004), Volume 2995 of Lecture Notes in Computer
50. Science, Oxford, UK, 29 March-1 April, 2004. [20] Dulay N, Lupu E, Sloman M, Damianou N.
51. “A Policy Deployment Model for the Ponder Language”.
52. In Proceedings of IEEE/IFIP International Symposium on
53. Integrated Network Management (IM 2001), UK, May 2001. [21] Tonti G, Bradshaw JM, Jeffers R, Montanari R, Suri N,
54. Uszok A. “Semantic Web Languages for Policy
55. Representation and Reasoning: A Comparison of KAoS,
56. Rei, and Ponder”. International Semantic Web Conference, Florida,
57. 20-23 October 2013. USA, [22] Lasierra N, Alesanco A, Guillen S, Garcia J. “A Three Stage
58. Ontology-Driven Solution to Provide Personalized Care to
59. Chronic Patients at Home”. Journal of Biomedical
60. Informatics, 46(3), 516-529, 2013. [23] Ueda M, Takahata M, Nakajima S. “User’s Food Preference Extraction for
61. Recommendation”. 2nd International Workshop on Semantic
62. Retrieval and Recommendation SPIM, Bonn, Germany, 23
63. 24 October 2011. Cooking Recipe Personalized Information Management: [24] Hella L, Krogstie J. “Personalisation by Semantic Web
64. Technology in Food Shopping”. In Proceedings of the
65. International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and
66. Semantics (WIMS’11), Sogndal, Norway, May 25-27, 2011. [25] Can Ö. Anlamsal Web İçin Kişiselleştirilebilir Ontoloji
67. Tabanlı Erişim Denetimi ve Politika Yönetimi.
68. Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir, Türkiye, 2009. [26] Can Ö, Sezer E, Bursa O, Ünalır MO. “Personalized
69. Vaccination using Ontology Based Profiling”. 7th Metadata
70. and Semantics Research Conference (MTSR 2013), CCIS
71. 390, Thessaloniki, Greece, 19-22 November 2013. [27] Snae C, Brückner, M. “FOODS: A Food-Oriented Ontology
72. Driven System”. 2nd IEEE International Conference on
73. Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST 2008),
74. Phitsanulok, 26-29 February 2008. [28] Cantais J, Dominguez D. Gigante V, Laera L, Tamma V.
75. “An Example of Food Ontology for Diabetes Control”.
76. Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference
77. 2005 Workshop on Ontology Patterns for the Semantic
78. Web”, Galvay, Ireland, 7 November 2005. Ek A yer Makale http://semanticweb.ege.edu.tr/ontology ulaşılabilmektedir. alan ontolojilere adresinden