Polinaftalin sülfonat esaslı süperakışkanlaştıcıların farklı inceliklere sahip Bayburt Taşı ikame edilmiş kompoze çimentoların mekanik ve fiziksel özelliklerine etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, puzolanik özelliğe sahip 45 µm ve 125 µm incelikte öğütülmüş Bayburt taşı PÇ 42.5R (CEM I) çimentoda sırasıyla ağırlıkça %0, 10, 20 ve %30 ikame edilmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı iki aşamada oluşturuldu: birincisi farklı inceliklere sahip zeolit içeren Bayburt taşı atıklarının CEM I tip çimentoya ikame edildikten sonra elde edilen çimentonun basınç dayanımı ve fiziksel özelliklerine etkilerini değerlendirmek, diğeri üretilen çimentoların farklı firmalara ait aynı tip süperakışkanlaştırıcılarla davranışını incelemektir. Hazırlanan hamur numuneler üzerinde standart kıvam, priz süreleri ve hacim sabitliği gibi standart çimento deneyleri, harç numuneler üzerinde yayılma ve basınç dayanımı deneyleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Harç numuneler 28 gün standart küre bırakılmış ve ardından 2, 7 ve 28 gün yaşlarında basınç dayanımı deneyi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak özgül yüzeye bağlı olarak değişen incelik fiziksel, mekanik ve reolojik özellikleri önemli derecede etkilemiştir. Bu çalışmada farklı firmalara ait polinaftalin sülfonat tipi süperakışkanlaştırıcıların beyaz Bayburt taşı ikameli çimentolarda kullanılabileceği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Bayburt taşı,Puzolan,Çimento,Süperakışkanlaştırıcı,İncelik

Effect of the polynaphtalene sulfonate based superplasticizer on mechanical and physical properties of blended cement replaced with Bayburt Stone at different fineness

Abstract

In this study, grinded Bayburt Stone has pozzolanic property with 45 µm and 125 µm fineness was replaced with PC 42.5R (CEM-I) type cement at ratio of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% by weight. The aim of this study was made up in two phase, one of them was to investigate the effects of Bayburt Stone waste contain zeolite with different fineness on physical and mechanical properties of composite cements and the other one was to investigate behavior of same superplasticizer belong to two different company. Standard consistency, setting time and volume expansion tests are performed on the cement pastes and compression strength and flow tests are performed on the cement mortars. Mortar specimens are kept in standard curing for 28 days, than compressive strength test are performed at the ages of 2, 7 and 28 days. As a result, changes in specific surface area depending on the particle size distribution of mineral additives makes significant different on the physical, mechanical and rheological properties of cement mortars. In this study, it was determined that same type of superplasticizers which had different companies could be used in blended cement replaced with Bayburt stone.

Keywords

• Bayburt stone,Pozzolan,Blended cement,Superplasticizer,Fineness

References

1. Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, Bahadori A. “Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 142-161, 2013.
2. Menendez E, Alvaro AM, Hernandez MT, Parra JL. “New methodology for assessing the environmental burden of cement mortars with partial replacement of coal bottom ash and fly ash”. Journal of Environmental Management, 133, 275-283, 2014.
3. Çelik Ö. “Farklı inceliklerdeki tras ve uçucu külün çimento dayanımlarına etkisi”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(3), 333-337, 2004.
4. Yajun J, Cahyadi JH. “Effects of densified silica fume on microstructure and compressive strength of blended cement pastes”. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(10), 1543-1548, 2003.
5. Öner M. “A study of intergrinding and separate grinding of blast furnace slag cement”. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(3), 473-480, 2000.
6. Canpolat F, Yılmaz K, Köse MM, Sümer M, Yurdusev MA. “Use of zeolite, coal bottom ash and fly ash as replacement materials in cement production”. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 731-735, 2004.
7. Kula I, Olgun A, Sevinc V, Erdogan Y. “An investigation on the use of tincal ore waste, fly ash, and coal bottom ash as Portland cement replacement materials”. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 227-232, 2002.
8. Filipponi P, Polettini A, Pomi R, Sirini P. “Physical and mechanical properties of cement-based products containing incineration bottom ash”. Waste Management, 23, 145–156, 2003.

9. Yılmaz B, Uçar A, Öteyaka B, Uz V. “Properties of zeolitic tuff (clinoptilolite) blended Portland cement”. Building and Environment, 42, 3808-3815, 2006.
10. Uzel B, Turanlı L. “Studies on blended cements containing a high volume of natural pozzolans”. Cement and Concrete Research, 33, 1777-1781, 2003.
11. Turanlı L, Uzal B, Bektas F. “Effect of large amounts of natural pozzolan addition on properties of blended cements”. Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 1106-1111, 2005.
12. Venkatanarayanan HK, Rangaraju PR. “Effect of grinding of low-carbon rice husk ash on the microstructure and performance properties blended cement concrete”. Cement & Concrete Composites, 55, 348-363, 2015.
13. Aruntaş HY, Gürü M, Dayı M, Tekin İ. “Utilization of waste marble dust as an additive in cement production”. Materials and Design, 31, 4039-4042, 2010.
14. Kocak Y, Nas S. “The effect of using fly ash on the strength and hydration characteristics of blended cements”. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 25-32, 2014.
15. Hewlett PC. Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. 4th ed. Newyork USA, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2004
16. Celik IB. “The effects of particle size distribution and surface area upon cement strength development”. Powder Technology, 188, 272-276, 2008.
17. Çelik MY, Sarıışık A, Gürcan S. “Mermer ve taş ocaklarının çevreye olan görsel etkileri”. Türkiye IV. Mermer Sempozyumu (MERSEM'2003) Bildiriler Kitabı, Afyon, Türkiye, 18-19 Aralık 2003.
18. Hanehara S., Yamada K. “Interaction between cement and chemical admixture from the point of cement hydration, absorption behavior of admixture, and paste rheology” Cement and Concrete Research, 29, 1159-1165, 1998.
19. Zhang MH, Sisomphon K, Ng TS, Sun DJ. “Effect of superplasticizers on workability retention and initial setting time of cement pastes”. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 1700-1707, 2010.
20. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM. Concrete Microstructure Properties and Materials, 3rd ed. Newyork, USA, McGraw-Hill, 2006.
21. Erdoğdu S. “Compatibility of superplasticizers with cements different in composition”. Cement and Concrete Research, 30, 767-773, 2000.
22. Simard MA, Nkinamubanzi PC, Jolicoeur C. “Calorimetry, rheology and compressive strength of superplasticized cement pastes”. Cement and Concrete Research, 23, 939-950, 1993.
23. Jolicoeur C, Simard MA. “Chemical admixture-cement interactions: Phenomenology and physico-chemical concepts”. Cement and Concrete Composites 20, 87-101, 1998.
24. Papo A, Piani L. “Effect of various superplasticizers on the rheological properties of Portland cement pastes”. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 2097-2100, 2004.
25. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. “Çimento-Bölüm 1: Genel Çimentolar-Bileşim, Özellikler ve Uygunluk Kriterleri”. Ankara, Türkiye, TS EN 197, 2012.
26. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. “Çimento Deney Metotları- Bölüm 3: Priz Süresi ve Hacim Genleşme Tayini”. Ankara Türkiye, TS EN 196-3, 2014.
27. American Society for Testing and Materials. “Standard Specification for Coal fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete”. USA, ASTM C 618, 2012.
28. Çavdar A, Yetgin Ş. “Availability of tuffs from northeast of Turkey as natural pozzolan on cement, some chemical and mechanical relationships”. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 2066-2071, 2007.
29. Tekin İ. “Properties of NaOH activated geopolymer with marble, travertine and volcanic tuff wastes”. Construction and Building Materials, 127, 607–617, 2016.
30. Reusch W. “Infrared Spectroscopy” lecture notes. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/spectrpy/infrared/infrared.htm Michigan State University Department of Chemistry, USA, (19.06.2013).
31. Gabuda SP, Kozlova SG, Kolesnikov AS, Petrov AK. “Microwave Absorption and Structure of Zeolite Water in Heulandite and Clinoptilolite by 1H NMR”. Journal of Structural Chemistry, 54, 119-125, 2013.
32. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü. “Çimento Deney Metotları, Bölüm 1: Dayanım Tayini”. Ankara Türkiye, TS EN 196-1, 2009.
33. American Society for Testing and Materials. “Standard Specification for Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement”. USA, ASTM C230, 2012.
34. Rixom R, Mailvaganam N. Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. 3rd ed. London UK, E. & F.N. Spon Ltd, 1999.
35. Demir İ, Sivrikaya B, İlhan O, Yaprak H. “Effect of pH value of curing water on cement mortar”. 2nd International Sustainable Building Symposium Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara, Türkiye, 28-30 Mayıs 2015.