Conference Paper

Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul

Volume: 26 Number: 8 December 10, 2020
  • Tuğce Erözemen
  • Ömer Ündül
  • Namık Aysal
EN

Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul

Abstract

İstanbul hosts large amount of historical buildings. Many of these buildings are made of limestone, fossiliferous limestone and clayey limestone widely known in the region as “Küfeki Stones”. In this study the effect of varying cleaning techniques on altered Küfeki stones was investigated. Within this respect, fresh Küfeki stone samples from original building stone (Bakırköy Küfekisi) and recently used substitute rocks from different quarries and regions around İstanbul were compiled. Mineralogical, petrographic and chemical analysis followed by physical and mechanical properties were investigated for these stones. Same stone samples were subjected to accelerated deterioration mechanisms. These altered stones were then cleaned with laser cleaning and pressurized micro-sand blasting techniques and weight losses were calculated and visual changes were determined. The results revealed that rock micro-texture and physical properties should be considered in determining the appropriate cleaning technique. Besides, the usage type of the stone and type of deterioration mechanism should also be considered during the determination of cleaning technique. It is also emphasized that the laser cleaning is less destructive method for cleaning Küfeki stones among the investigated techniques.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Angı OS, Yavuz O, Çiftçi E. “Geo-lithological and archi-tectonical properties of ındigenous building and ornamental stones used in landmark structures in istanbul from past to present”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 28(1), 163-196, 2015. (in Turkish).
  2. [2] Arıç C. The Eology of Haliç-Küçükçekmece Region. PhD Thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 1955. (in Turkish).
  3. [3] Mahmutoğlu Y, Angı OS, Özmen IE, Yeşilkaya Z. “Investigation of potential resource areas of indigenous natural stones used in historical buildings in Istanbul”. National Engineering Geology and Geotechnic Symposium, Denizli, Türkiye 12-14 Ekim 2017. (in Turkish).
  4. [4] Kumral M, Şans G, Yalçın C, Kaya M, Bodakoğlu M. “The effects of physical and chemical properties on the formation of historical küfeki stone in Çatalca (Istanbul)”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 278-287, 2019. (in Turkish).
  5. [5] Serhatoğlu C. Livaoğlu R. “A fast and practical approximations for fundamental period of historical Ottoman minarets”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 120, 320–331, 2019.
  6. [6] Tuğrul A, Zarif H, Yıldırım M, Gürpınar O. “Effective factors in deterioration of limestones used in historical buildings and monuments in İstanbul”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 12, 39-51, 1999. (in Turkish).
  7. [7] Spry AH. Principles of Cleaning Masonry Buildings. Melbourne, Australia, Australian Council of National Trusts, 1982.
  8. [8] Sayar M, Erguvanlı K. Marbles and Construction Stones of Turkey. İstanbul, Türkiye, İTÜ Yayınları, 1962. (in Turkish).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Authors

Tuğce Erözemen This is me
Türkiye

Ömer Ündül This is me
Türkiye

Namık Aysal This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 10, 2020

Submission Date

May 6, 2020

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 26 Number: 8

APA
Erözemen, T., Ündül, Ö., & Aysal, N. (2020). Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(8), 1413-1418. https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE
AMA
1.Erözemen T, Ündül Ö, Aysal N. Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;26(8):1413-1418. https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE
Chicago
Erözemen, Tuğce, Ömer Ündül, and Namık Aysal. 2020. “Evaluation for the Effects of Different Cleaning Techniques Applied on Küfeki Stones Used in Historical Buildings in İstanbul”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 26 (8): 1413-18. https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE.
EndNote
Erözemen T, Ündül Ö, Aysal N (December 1, 2020) Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 26 8 1413–1418.
IEEE
[1]T. Erözemen, Ö. Ündül, and N. Aysal, “Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul”, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1413–1418, Dec. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE
ISNAD
Erözemen, Tuğce - Ündül, Ömer - Aysal, Namık. “Evaluation for the Effects of Different Cleaning Techniques Applied on Küfeki Stones Used in Historical Buildings in İstanbul”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 26/8 (December 1, 2020): 1413-1418. https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE.
JAMA
1.Erözemen T, Ündül Ö, Aysal N. Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;26:1413–1418.
MLA
Erözemen, Tuğce, et al. “Evaluation for the Effects of Different Cleaning Techniques Applied on Küfeki Stones Used in Historical Buildings in İstanbul”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 8, Dec. 2020, pp. 1413-8, https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE.
Vancouver
1.Tuğce Erözemen, Ömer Ündül, Namık Aysal. Evaluation for the effects of different cleaning techniques applied on Küfeki Stones Used in historical buildings in İstanbul. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1;26(8):1413-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA99UR83JE