Research Article

UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK

Volume: 21 Number: 1 July 30, 2025
EN

UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK

Abstract

Purpose- In the contemporary business landscape, we are witnessing the rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), which is fundamentally reshaping organizational practices. These developments mark what can be described as the "Era of AI", a significant milestone in technological history. While AI offers benefits, it also presents critical challenges, particularly concerning its adoption and the adaptation processes within organizations. Despite the swift evolution of AI technologies, research on their practical applications in organizational settings remains scarce and underdeveloped. This gap highlights a promising area for further exploration. In alignment with the literature, it can be argued that organizations with higher AI adoption rates tend to achieve better innovation outcomes, which suggests a need to revisit and potentially expand the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) paradigm. Originally developed to explain technological adoption/embracement, the TOE framework may not capture the complexities introduced by AI. This study aims to explore whether an expanded TOE paradigm is necessary to better address the contemporary dynamics of AI adoption. Methodology- This research investigates the historical development and consolidation of AI within organizations, using the TOE paradigm as a foundational theoretical look. The study examines whether the existing TOE model sufficiently explains AI adoption or whether it requires augmentation to remain relevant in the age of generative AI. Findings- Literature review findings indicate that the traditional TOE framework exhibits limitations when applied to AI adoption. To address these gaps, another study was found in the literature that proposes the inclusion of a human factor—transforming the TOE into a TOEH (Technology-Organization-Environment-Human) model. In our research we would like to integrate critical thinking (CT) skills under Human Factor, as organizations increasingly seek employees who can critically assess and effectively utilize outputs from generative AI (GenAI) tools. The ability to make intelligent and ethical decisions in the context of AI is now a vital competency. Conclusion- The proposed TOEH framework offers a more well-rounded approach to discovering AI adoption within organizations. By incorporating the human element, particularly critical thinking skills, organizations can better prepare to embrace AI in an ethical, effective, and innovative manner.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, W., & Khan, A. Z. (2024). Factors Influencing Readiness for Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review. Data Science and Management, 8(2), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2024.09.005
  2. AlRadini, F., Ahmad, N., Eiaz Kahloon, L., Javaid, A., & Al Zamil, N. (2022). Measuring Readiness for Self-Directed Learning in Medical Undergraduates. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13, 449-455. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S360333
  3. Alsheibani, S., Cheung, Y., & Messom, C. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Adoption: AI-readiness at Firm Level. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems 2018 (PACIS 2018), Yokahama, Japan, 26-30 June 2018, 37.
  4. Andersson, L. (2025). Are You Prepared: A Study of AI Readiness within the Energy Sector. [Degree of Master, Umea University]. Retrieved July 19, 2025 from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=-4014&pid=diva2%3A1978069
  5. Baskara, F. R. (2025). Conceptualizing Digital Literacy for the AI Era: A Framework for Preparing Students in an AI-Driven World. Data and Metadata, 4, 530. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025530
  6. Baslom, M. M. M., & Tong, S. (2019). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge and Employee’s Awareness About Artificial Intelligence with Mediating Effect of Learning Climate. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 12(2), 1585-1591.
  7. Barreras, R. V. (2025). Surfing the Future: Why Education Needs to Embrace AI, Soft Skills and Self-awareness. World Economic Forum. Retrieved July 8, from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/06/education-future-skills-ai/
  8. Bhattacherjee, A., & Hikmet, N. (2008). Reconceptualizing Organizational Support and Its Effects on Information Technology Usage: Evidence From the Healthcare Sector. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 69-76.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Finance, Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 30, 2025

Submission Date

June 1, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 15, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 21 Number: 1

APA
Dönmez, S., Tuncay Çelikel, A., Sarıca, Y. P., & Develi, E. İ. (2025). UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK. PressAcademia Procedia, 21(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994
AMA
1.Dönmez S, Tuncay Çelikel A, Sarıca YP, Develi Eİ. UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK. PAP. 2025;21(1):64-69. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994
Chicago
Dönmez, Sena, Aslı Tuncay Çelikel, Yeşim Pınar Sarıca, and Evrim İldem Develi. 2025. “UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK”. PressAcademia Procedia 21 (1): 64-69. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994.
EndNote
Dönmez S, Tuncay Çelikel A, Sarıca YP, Develi Eİ (July 1, 2025) UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK. PressAcademia Procedia 21 1 64–69.
IEEE
[1]S. Dönmez, A. Tuncay Çelikel, Y. P. Sarıca, and E. İ. Develi, “UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK”, PAP, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 64–69, July 2025, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994.
ISNAD
Dönmez, Sena - Tuncay Çelikel, Aslı - Sarıca, Yeşim Pınar - Develi, Evrim İldem. “UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK”. PressAcademia Procedia 21/1 (July 1, 2025): 64-69. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994.
JAMA
1.Dönmez S, Tuncay Çelikel A, Sarıca YP, Develi Eİ. UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK. PAP. 2025;21:64–69.
MLA
Dönmez, Sena, et al. “UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 21, no. 1, July 2025, pp. 64-69, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994.
Vancouver
1.Sena Dönmez, Aslı Tuncay Çelikel, Yeşim Pınar Sarıca, Evrim İldem Develi. UNDERSTANDING AI ADOPTION AT ORGANIZATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW OF TOE FRAMEWORK. PAP. 2025 Jul. 1;21(1):64-9. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1994

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.