BibTex RIS Cite

A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY

Year 2016, , 715 - 722, 01.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693

Abstract

Railways are in the human life for over 200 years and they are directly related to the socio-economic conditions of the country. The transport sector has played a key role until the end of the Second World War. With the development of machinery industry, motor vehicles created an alternative way for the transportation and it putted and end to the superiority of railways. However, countries try to revive railway sector due to the economic reasons. This studying discussed the scope of the industry's restructuring efforts and examined the work carried out reforms. In line with these studies, opening the Turkey’s railway sector into competition and presents views on the creation of a suitable model were investigated

References

  • Kabasakal, A., Solak, A. O. (2009, Aralık). Demiryolu Sektörünün Rekabete Açılması. Sosyal Bilimleri Dergisi, 25: 27-34.
  • Cantos, P. and Campos, J. (2005). Recent Changes In The Global Rail Industry: Facing The Challenge Of Increased Flexibility, European Transport,29:1-21.
  • Özcan, İ. Ç. (2006, Aralık). Demiryolu Ulaştırmasında Kamu-Özel İşbirliği Modeli ve Türk Tecrübesi. Uluslararası Demiryolu Sempozyumu
  • Bildiriler Kitabı. Cilt. 2,: 1058
  • Duman, İ. (2006, Aralık).Demiryollarının yeniden yapılanma ihtiyacı ve TCDD’ deki Gelişmeler.Uluslararası Demiryolu Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Cilt. 2: 1042.
  • Bayraktutan, Y., Özbilgin. (2014, 15-17 Mayıs). Raylı Yük Taşıma Sistemlerinin İktisadi Avantajları ve Türkiye İçin Bir Değerlendirme. III.
  • Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresinde sunuldu, Trabzon. McCullough, G. J. (2006) . U.S. Railroad Efficiency: An Economic View in Conference Proceedings XX: Research to EnhanceRail Network
  • Performance. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC: 2-21 http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/7ccd0ae17c4c6a8_ek.pdf?dergi=920: Son Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2016
  • Ulaştırma Hizmetleri DemiryoluTaşımacılığı,MEB,2011,Ankara:5-6
  • Karamanoğlu, C. (2011). Demiryolu Sektöründe Yapısal Reformlar ve Rekabet: Serbestleşme Öncesi Türkiye İçin Öneriler, Uzmanlık Tezi,
  • Rekabet Kurumu, Ankara: 11-26
  • Gomez-Ibanez, J. A. (2004). Railroad Reform: An Overview Of The Options. Paper to be presented at the Conference on Railway Reform
  • Rafael del Pino Foundation, Madrid: 2-19. Thomson, L. S. (1997). World Bank Support for Developing Railways of the World. Japan Railway&Transport Review, 2-15.
  • Ordover, J., Pittman, R. (1994). Restructuring the Railway for Competition. Paper to be presented at the OECD/World Bank Conference on
  • Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest:1-3
  • OECD. (2005). Structural Reform in the Rail Industry. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 7-57.
  • OECD. (1997). Railways: Structure, Regulation and Competition Policy: 9-249.
  • ESCAP. (2003). The Restructuring of Railways. New York,: Economic And Social Commission For Asia And The Pacific: 19-20. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2013/05/20130501-1.htm: Son Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2016
  • Pittman, R. (2005). Structural Separation to Create Competition? The Case of Freight Railways, Review of Network Economics, 4 (3):181
  • Pittman, R. W. (2002). Chinese Railway Reform and Competition: Vertical or Horizontal Restructuring ?.US Department of Justice Antitrust
  • Division, Economic Analysis Group Working, 02 (2): 7-12.

DEMİRYOLU İŞLETMECİLİĞİ REKABET MODELLERİNİN TÜRKİYE’ YE UYARLANMASI ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Year 2016, , 715 - 722, 01.06.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693

Abstract

Demiryolları, iki yüz seneyi aşkın bir süredir insan hayatının içindedir ve ülkelerin sosyo-ekonomik koşulları ile doğrudan ilintilidir. Sektör ikinci dünya savaşının sonuna kadar taşımacılıkta kilit rol üstlenmiştir. Lakin makine endüstrisinin gelişmesi ile birlikte motorlu taşıtlar demiryollarının taşımacılık alanındaki konumuna alternatif oluşturmuş ve demiryollarının bu alandaki üstünlüğüne son vermiştir. Bununla birlikte demiryollarının karayollarına oranla daha ekonomik bir ulaştırma türü olması nedeniyle, ülkeler sektörü yeniden canlandırma girişimlerine başlamışlardır. Bu çalışma kapsamında sektörün yeniden yapılandırılma çalışmaları ele alınmış, yürütülen reform çalışmaları incelenmiş, bu çalışmalar doğrultusunda Türkiye’ de demiryolu sektörünün rekabete açılması ve uygun modelin oluşturulması konusunda görüşler sunulmuştur

References

  • Kabasakal, A., Solak, A. O. (2009, Aralık). Demiryolu Sektörünün Rekabete Açılması. Sosyal Bilimleri Dergisi, 25: 27-34.
  • Cantos, P. and Campos, J. (2005). Recent Changes In The Global Rail Industry: Facing The Challenge Of Increased Flexibility, European Transport,29:1-21.
  • Özcan, İ. Ç. (2006, Aralık). Demiryolu Ulaştırmasında Kamu-Özel İşbirliği Modeli ve Türk Tecrübesi. Uluslararası Demiryolu Sempozyumu
  • Bildiriler Kitabı. Cilt. 2,: 1058
  • Duman, İ. (2006, Aralık).Demiryollarının yeniden yapılanma ihtiyacı ve TCDD’ deki Gelişmeler.Uluslararası Demiryolu Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Cilt. 2: 1042.
  • Bayraktutan, Y., Özbilgin. (2014, 15-17 Mayıs). Raylı Yük Taşıma Sistemlerinin İktisadi Avantajları ve Türkiye İçin Bir Değerlendirme. III.
  • Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresinde sunuldu, Trabzon. McCullough, G. J. (2006) . U.S. Railroad Efficiency: An Economic View in Conference Proceedings XX: Research to EnhanceRail Network
  • Performance. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC: 2-21 http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/7ccd0ae17c4c6a8_ek.pdf?dergi=920: Son Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2016
  • Ulaştırma Hizmetleri DemiryoluTaşımacılığı,MEB,2011,Ankara:5-6
  • Karamanoğlu, C. (2011). Demiryolu Sektöründe Yapısal Reformlar ve Rekabet: Serbestleşme Öncesi Türkiye İçin Öneriler, Uzmanlık Tezi,
  • Rekabet Kurumu, Ankara: 11-26
  • Gomez-Ibanez, J. A. (2004). Railroad Reform: An Overview Of The Options. Paper to be presented at the Conference on Railway Reform
  • Rafael del Pino Foundation, Madrid: 2-19. Thomson, L. S. (1997). World Bank Support for Developing Railways of the World. Japan Railway&Transport Review, 2-15.
  • Ordover, J., Pittman, R. (1994). Restructuring the Railway for Competition. Paper to be presented at the OECD/World Bank Conference on
  • Competition and Regulation in Network Infrastructure Industries, Budapest:1-3
  • OECD. (2005). Structural Reform in the Rail Industry. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 7-57.
  • OECD. (1997). Railways: Structure, Regulation and Competition Policy: 9-249.
  • ESCAP. (2003). The Restructuring of Railways. New York,: Economic And Social Commission For Asia And The Pacific: 19-20. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2013/05/20130501-1.htm: Son Erişim Tarihi: 09.03.2016
  • Pittman, R. (2005). Structural Separation to Create Competition? The Case of Freight Railways, Review of Network Economics, 4 (3):181
  • Pittman, R. W. (2002). Chinese Railway Reform and Competition: Vertical or Horizontal Restructuring ?.US Department of Justice Antitrust
  • Division, Economic Analysis Group Working, 02 (2): 7-12.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA55YN98HV
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ahmet Ertugrul Doludeniz This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Doludeniz, A. E. (2016). A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia, 2(1), 715-722. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693
AMA Doludeniz AE. A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY. PAP. June 2016;2(1):715-722. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693
Chicago Doludeniz, Ahmet Ertugrul. “A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 2, no. 1 (June 2016): 715-22. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693.
EndNote Doludeniz AE (June 1, 2016) A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia 2 1 715–722.
IEEE A. E. Doludeniz, “A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY”, PAP, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 715–722, 2016, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693.
ISNAD Doludeniz, Ahmet Ertugrul. “A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 2/1 (June 2016), 715-722. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693.
JAMA Doludeniz AE. A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY. PAP. 2016;2:715–722.
MLA Doludeniz, Ahmet Ertugrul. “A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, pp. 715-22, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118693.
Vancouver Doludeniz AE. A STUDY ON ADAPTATION OF RAILWAY MANAGEMENT COMPETITION MODELS FOR TURKEY. PAP. 2016;2(1):715-22.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.