EVALUATING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION
Abstract
The most significant element of the sustainable system depends on their own limits. For instance, Water is the most crucial one of all, since it’s a significant input for essentially every industrial production and manufacturing step. This situation symbolizes that there is a limit to the amount of location, water, energy sources and all sources, input elements of the system supported by the world. The sustainability of materials, natural sources are vital needs for the households. What households consume today will not be enough for the next generation. If a product is not used up and throws away rapidly, the consumer needs a new one, and so there are requirements to produce with raw materials and resources again. If the good does not have the capability of being recycled, manufacturers will give damages, harmful to the environmental location. The term “water, energy footprint” and “carbon footprint” is put forward to measure the total volume of carbon dioxide emission and also natural water and energy resources used for manufacturing processes, or used by an individual or a community. All the activities and requirements of the population are caused greenhouse gasses emission. These concepts and results induce the climate change of the world. Regarding to the main subject which is defined in the above, the aim of this research is to investigate some developments which decrease the amount of waste in the industrial production stages and at the end of lifecycle time of products. The purpose of this study is to present a general review of the sustainability literature to decrease the amount of waste and to evaluate the environmental oriented production and consumption by SWOT Analysis; This research involves main concepts of environmental dimension of sustainability that aims to declare the significant of the carbon and water footprint for the ecological life.
Keywords
References
- Ahi, P. and Searcy, C. 2013, “A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.52 pp. 329-341
- Allwood, J. M., Laursen, S.E., Rodríguez, C. M. and Bocken, N. M. P. 2006, “Well dressed? The present and future sustainability of clothing and textiles in the United Kingdom”, Technical annex, University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, pp. 3-56.
- Ashby, N. J. S., Dickert, S. and Glöckner, A. 2012, “Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership”, Judgment and Decision Making, vol.7, no.3, pp. 254– 67.
- Beamon, B. 1999,” Designing the green supply chain. Logistic Information Management”, vol.12, no.4, pp.332-342.
- Bcst, National Research Council Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology. 2005, ‘Sustainability in the Chemical Industry: GrandChallenges and Research Needs’, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., ISBN-10: 0-309-09571-9 accessed: 04.03.2009 online at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11437
- Boons F.A.A. and Baas L.W.1997, “Types of Industrial Ecology: the problem of coordination”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.5, no.1-2, pp. 79-86.
- Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Liedekerke, L.V. and De Moor, L. 2011,” Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: A Comprehensive Picture”, Accounting Forum, vol.35, pp.187-204.
- Buyukozkan, G. and Cifci, G. 2012, “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.39, pp.3000–3011.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 30, 2017
Submission Date
May 20, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 1