Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, , 488 - 494, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433

Abstract

References

  • ANONİM 1, (2009), Mühendis ve Makina Dergisi Cilt: 50, Sayı: 592, ss: 33-36.
  • ASFAHL, C. Ray (2004), Industrial Safety and Health Management, Fifth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • DEMİRBİLEK, T., ÇAKIR, Ö., (2008), Kişisel Koruyucu Donanım Kullanımını Etkileyen Bireysel ve Örgütsel Değişkenler Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt:23 Sayı:2, ss:173-191.
  • HALE, Andrew R. ve GLENDON, A. Ian (1987, Individual Behaviour in the Control of Danger, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
  • ÖYMEZ, Y., (2017), İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği, Kişisel Koruyucu ve Donanımlar 13. Ünite, Atatürk Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi, Erzurum.
  • TÜİK, (2015), İş Kazaları ve Meslek Hastalıkları İstatistikleri Erişim: (24.04.2015). T.C. Resmi Gazete, İş Sağlığı ve İş Kanunu.
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete, Kişisel Koruyucu Donanımların İşyerlerinde Kullanılması Hakkında Yönetmelik-2016.
  • WEINSTEIN, Michael B., (1997), Total Quality Safety Management and Auditing, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
  • WENTZ, Charles A., (1998), Safety, Health and Environmental Protection, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Boston.

ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES

Year 2017, , 488 - 494, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433

Abstract

494 occupational illnesses and 1,626 death out of
221,336 occupational accidents occurred in 2014 (TUIK). Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE), protects against to health or safety issue based on an
occupation, designed for specific aim, can be worn, hold or attached to an
employer, have a significant impact for declining the occupational
illness/accident.   In this study,
different types were investigated, and responsibility of employ/employer was
assessed. Also, the usages, benefits, and impacts of PPE were evaluated in a
site. Data obtained was analyzed with Excel and concluded if PPE is used
properly, it protects an employer against to occupational accidents. 

References

  • ANONİM 1, (2009), Mühendis ve Makina Dergisi Cilt: 50, Sayı: 592, ss: 33-36.
  • ASFAHL, C. Ray (2004), Industrial Safety and Health Management, Fifth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • DEMİRBİLEK, T., ÇAKIR, Ö., (2008), Kişisel Koruyucu Donanım Kullanımını Etkileyen Bireysel ve Örgütsel Değişkenler Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt:23 Sayı:2, ss:173-191.
  • HALE, Andrew R. ve GLENDON, A. Ian (1987, Individual Behaviour in the Control of Danger, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
  • ÖYMEZ, Y., (2017), İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği, Kişisel Koruyucu ve Donanımlar 13. Ünite, Atatürk Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi, Erzurum.
  • TÜİK, (2015), İş Kazaları ve Meslek Hastalıkları İstatistikleri Erişim: (24.04.2015). T.C. Resmi Gazete, İş Sağlığı ve İş Kanunu.
  • T.C. Resmi Gazete, Kişisel Koruyucu Donanımların İşyerlerinde Kullanılması Hakkında Yönetmelik-2016.
  • WEINSTEIN, Michael B., (1997), Total Quality Safety Management and Auditing, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
  • WENTZ, Charles A., (1998), Safety, Health and Environmental Protection, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Boston.
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Colak

Sebnem Korkut This is me

Tahsin Cetin

Publication Date June 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Colak, M., Korkut, S., & Cetin, T. (2017). ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 488-494. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433
AMA Colak M, Korkut S, Cetin T. ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES. PAP. June 2017;3(1):488-494. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433
Chicago Colak, Mehmet, Sebnem Korkut, and Tahsin Cetin. “ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES”. PressAcademia Procedia 3, no. 1 (June 2017): 488-94. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433.
EndNote Colak M, Korkut S, Cetin T (June 1, 2017) ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES. PressAcademia Procedia 3 1 488–494.
IEEE M. Colak, S. Korkut, and T. Cetin, “ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES”, PAP, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 488–494, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433.
ISNAD Colak, Mehmet et al. “ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES”. PressAcademia Procedia 3/1 (June 2017), 488-494. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433.
JAMA Colak M, Korkut S, Cetin T. ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES. PAP. 2017;3:488–494.
MLA Colak, Mehmet et al. “ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 488-94, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.433.
Vancouver Colak M, Korkut S, Cetin T. ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT IN BUSINESSES. PAP. 2017;3(1):488-94.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.