Research Article

MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE

Volume: 4 Number: 1 June 30, 2017
  • Ozlen Hic Birol
EN

MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE

Abstract

We attempt to make a comparative evaluation of modern macroeconomic schools: Monetarism and New Classical School based on the Classical System that envisage automatic full employment or natural rate of unemployment (NRU) equilibrium (AFNE or ANRUE) vs. New Keynesian and PostKeynesian Economics based on the Keynesian System which gives unemployment equilibrium (UNE) or non-automatic NRU equilibrium (NANRUE) due to insufficiency of aggregate demand. In order to determine which school is relevant, first the basic assumptions of these systems are compared: i) rational vs. adjusted vs. heterogeneous expectations, ii) existence of perfect competition in all markets leading to flexibility of prices and wages vs. imperfect competition giving rise to rigidities, and iii) presence or lack of coordination between markets. In the final phase of our evaluations the performance of the developed economies are surveyed to establish whether we meet with AFNE or ANRUE or else UNE or NANRUE; and whether policy prescriptions devised by respective schools solve or alleviate the problem at hand when implemented. Our investigations point out that New Keynesian and Post-Keynesian schools are more relevant compared to Monetarism and New Classical School. The choice between New Keynesian and Post-Keynesian Economics, however, is more difficult to make although New Keynesian Economics seems more widespread than Post-Keynesian Economics. Objectively, Post-Keynesian assumptions seem more realistic; normatively, however, New Keynesian stands seems more fit to the present day move towards globalization.  

Keywords

References

  1. ACKLEY, Hugh Gardner: Macroeconomic Theory. Macmillan Co., 1963.
  2. AKERLOF, George: “Gift Exchange and Efficiency Wage Theory: Four Views,” AER, No. 74, May 1984.
  3. _____, and YELLEN, Janet L.: “A Near-Rational Model of the Business Cycles with Wage and Price Inertia,” QJE, No. 100 supplement, 1985.
  4. ANDO, Albert F., KENNICKELL, Arthur: “Failure of Keynesian Economics and ‘Direct’ Effects of Money Supply: A Fact or a Fiction,” University of Pennsylvania, mimeo, 1985.
  5. ARESTIS, Phillip: The Post-Keynesian Approach to Economics: An Alternative Analysis of Economic Theory and Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1994.
  6. BALL, Laurence B., and COCCHETTI, Stephen, G.: “Imperfect Information and Staggered Price Setting,” AER, Dec. 1988.
  7. BARRO, Robert J.: Money Expectations and Business Cycles: Essays in Macroeconomics. Academic Press, 1981.
  8. _____, and KING, Robert G.: “Time-Separable Preferences and Inter-Temporal Substitution Models of Business Cycles,” QJE, Nov. 1984.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ozlen Hic Birol This is me

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

March 31, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Hic Birol, O. (2017). MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE. PressAcademia Procedia, 4(1), 327-335. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551
AMA
1.Hic Birol O. MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE. PAP. 2017;4(1):327-335. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551
Chicago
Hic Birol, Ozlen. 2017. “MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE”. PressAcademia Procedia 4 (1): 327-35. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551.
EndNote
Hic Birol O (June 1, 2017) MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE. PressAcademia Procedia 4 1 327–335.
IEEE
[1]O. Hic Birol, “MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE”, PAP, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 327–335, June 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551.
ISNAD
Hic Birol, Ozlen. “MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE”. PressAcademia Procedia 4/1 (June 1, 2017): 327-335. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551.
JAMA
1.Hic Birol O. MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE. PAP. 2017;4:327–335.
MLA
Hic Birol, Ozlen. “MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 4, no. 1, June 2017, pp. 327-35, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551.
Vancouver
1.Ozlen Hic Birol. MODERN MACROECONOMIC SCHOOLS THEIR METHODOLOGY, ASSUMPTIONS, CONCLUSIONS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND RELEVANCE. PAP. 2017 Jun. 1;4(1):327-35. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.551

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.