Research Article

USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM

Volume: 5 Number: 1 June 30, 2017
EN

USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM

Abstract

Turkey has a high potential in the field of agriculture and livestock production. Turkey has a long history in the production of livestock system, which became the “buffer” sector of economy and the “locomotive” sector of Turkey. Although nowadays pastures are decreased, Turkey has quite large pastures. Besides, the domestic demand for meat in Turkey is quite large and tend to a show considerable growth. Animal husbandry is carrying great importance in terms of protein source and fattening cattle in the red meat production. In this sense, the development of meat production in terms of quality and quantity is also very necessary in terms of the nutritional problem that arises parallel to the growing population. In this study, the causes of increase in meat prices in Turkey were investigated, and the findings showed that, the cause of the price increases made as inadequate animal fattening. As a result, it was decided to establish a new place for the production of cattle-raising. Before starting the construction of the fattening livestock farm, firstly the location of the establishment is considered. In the decision-making process, it is quite difficult to make choices because of the different alternatives in terms of various criteria's. For this purpose, the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) method, which is an easy and straightforward method of multi-criteria decision making techniques which are frequently used in researches in recent years, has been used to select the place of establishment in Turkey. The choice of fattening farm establishment site was evaluated in 81 provinces; cattle feed areas, demand on meat, urban development index value, average minimum temperature, average maximum temperature, precipitation amount and grant support criteria were evaluated with using the PROMETHEE method. The interactions between the criterion and the criteria that influence the process were determined as a result of the survey conducted. As a result of this survey study, criteria weights and criterion values were determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and solved by PROMETHEE method considering the results. As a conclusion, the most suitable and the less suitable provinces for fattening livestock farm are selected 

Keywords

References

  1. Athawale, V.M. ve Chakraborty, S. 2010. “Facility Location Selection Using PROMETHEE II Method”, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh,pp: 59-63.
  2. Bakan, H., 2013, “Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemiyle Üniversite Kurulması Uygun Olan İlçelerin Belirlenmesi” Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), s:43-63.
  3. Çiftçioğlu, B., 2013, “İnşaat Sektöründe AHP Yöntemi İle Alt Yüklenici Seçimi: Bir Konut Projesinde Uygulama”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  4. Çukur, F., Saner G., 2005, “Konvansiyonel ve Ekolojik Hayvancılık Sistemlerinin Sürdürülebilirliği ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), s:39-44.
  5. Dağdeviren, M. ve Eraslan, E. 2008, “PROMETHEE Sıralama Yöntemiyle Tedarikçi Seçimi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1): 69-75.
  6. Ekmekyapar, T., 1991, Hayvan Barınaklarında Çevre Koşullarının Düzenlenmesi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Erzurum.
  7. Genç, T., Masca, M. 2013, “Topsis ve Promethee Yöntemleri ile Elde Edilen Üstünlük Sıralamalarının Bir Uygulama Üzerinden Karşılaştırılması”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15(2): 539-566.
  8. Hacıbebekoğlu, A., Hacıbebekoğlu M., Çetinel, S., Ülver, M. 2013, Büyükbaş Hayvan Besiciliği Yatırım Fizibilitesi, Karacadağ Kalkınma Ajansı Destek Programı.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

March 17, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Ozcan, B., Akman, G., Karabicak, C., & Erdogan, Y. (2017). USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581
AMA
1.Ozcan B, Akman G, Karabicak C, Erdogan Y. USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM. PAP. 2017;5(1):130-138. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581
Chicago
Ozcan, Burcu, Gulsen Akman, Cagin Karabicak, and Yasin Erdogan. 2017. “USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM”. PressAcademia Procedia 5 (1): 130-38. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581.
EndNote
Ozcan B, Akman G, Karabicak C, Erdogan Y (June 1, 2017) USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM. PressAcademia Procedia 5 1 130–138.
IEEE
[1]B. Ozcan, G. Akman, C. Karabicak, and Y. Erdogan, “USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM”, PAP, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 130–138, June 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581.
ISNAD
Ozcan, Burcu - Akman, Gulsen - Karabicak, Cagin - Erdogan, Yasin. “USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM”. PressAcademia Procedia 5/1 (June 1, 2017): 130-138. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581.
JAMA
1.Ozcan B, Akman G, Karabicak C, Erdogan Y. USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM. PAP. 2017;5:130–138.
MLA
Ozcan, Burcu, et al. “USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2017, pp. 130-8, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581.
Vancouver
1.Burcu Ozcan, Gulsen Akman, Cagin Karabicak, Yasin Erdogan. USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SELECTION PROVINCES FOR FATTENING FARM. PAP. 2017 Jun. 1;5(1):130-8. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.581

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.