Research Article

OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY

Volume: 5 Number: 1 June 30, 2017
  • Essam Hanandeh
EN

OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY

Abstract

Nowadays,  text classification is used in various fields of research and applications, such as information retrieval, text mining, and data mining. This study tests the Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine algorithms on a relatively large dataset of Arabic documents. This dataset comprise 1,000 Arabic documents that are distributed across 10 classes. This comparison is based on recall and precision measures. The evaluation results show that the Support Vector Machine algorithms classifier outperforms the other two

Keywords

References

  1. Ababneh, J., Almomani, O., Hadi, W., El-Omari, N.K.T., and Al-Ibrahim, A., "Vector Space Models to Classify Arabic Text," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol 7, 2014
  2. Agirre E., Lacalle O., and Soroa A., “Knowledge-Based WSD on Specific Domains: Performing Better than Generic Supervised WSD,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, USA, pp. 1501-1506, 2009.
  3. Alsaleem, S., " Automated Arabic Text Categorization Using SVM and NB," International Arab Journal of e-Technology, Vol. 2, 2011
  4. Al-Harbi, S., Almuhareb, A., Al-Thubaity, A., Khorsheed, M. S. and Al-Rajeh, A. "Automatic Arabic Text Classification," Proceedings of The 9th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, Lyon-France, 2008
  5. Al-Kabi, M. N., & Al-Sinjilawi, S. I. (2007). a Comparative Study of the Efficiency of Different Measures To Classify Arabic Text. University of Sharjah Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, 4(2), 13–26.
  6. Bawaneh, M.J., Alkoffash, M.S., and Al Rabea A.I."ArabicText Classification using K-NN and Naive Bayes". Journal of Computer Science, vol. 4, 2008. Duwairi, R. "Arabic Text Categorization," The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 4, 2007.
  7. El-halees, A. (2011). Arabic Opinion Mining Using Combined Classification Approach. Proceeding The International Arab Conference On Information Technology, Azrqa, Jordan.
  8. Gharib, T. F., Habib, M. B., & Fayed, Z. T. (2009). Arabic Text Classification Using Support Vector Machines. International Journal of Computers and Their Applications, 16(4), 192–199. Retrieved from http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/75679

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Essam Hanandeh This is me

Publication Date

June 30, 2017

Submission Date

April 11, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Hanandeh, E. (2017). OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 274-277. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600
AMA
1.Hanandeh E. OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY. PAP. 2017;5(1):274-277. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600
Chicago
Hanandeh, Essam. 2017. “OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5 (1): 274-77. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600.
EndNote
Hanandeh E (June 1, 2017) OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY. PressAcademia Procedia 5 1 274–277.
IEEE
[1]E. Hanandeh, “OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY”, PAP, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 274–277, June 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600.
ISNAD
Hanandeh, Essam. “OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5/1 (June 1, 2017): 274-277. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600.
JAMA
1.Hanandeh E. OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY. PAP. 2017;5:274–277.
MLA
Hanandeh, Essam. “OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2017, pp. 274-7, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600.
Vancouver
1.Essam Hanandeh. OVERVIEW AND COMPARISON OF THREE CLASSIFIERS: ARABIC DOCUMENTS AS A CASE STUDY. PAP. 2017 Jun. 1;5(1):274-7. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.600

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.