ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING: VALIDATION OF THE SCALE IN TURKEY

Abstract

Academic entrepreneurship is defined as entrepreneurial activities engaged by faculty in order to commercialize research results and deliver societal and economic benefits. It is closely related to the “Entrepreneurial University” which extends the mission of universities beyond teaching and research. Higher education institutions and their affiliated faculty members in sciences and engineering disciplines are important actors of innovation ecosystems. This study investigates academic entrepreneurial intentions distinguished by soft level intentions (industry collaboration) and hard level intentions (spin-off formation). The data was collected between December 2015, and March 2016 from a national online survey of Turkish academics in science and engineering faculties at approximately 90 universities of which 402 full responses were gathered. Major methodology included multivariate analysis technique namely as Structural Equation Modelling. Within the scope of this study, the constructs of academic entrepreneurship intentions were created and applied comprehensively in sciences and engineering disciplines in Turkey for the first time.  

Keywords

• Academic entrepreneurship,entrepreneurial university,technology transfer,innovation,entrepreneurship

References

1. Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408-422. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
2. Axler, R. E. (2015). Commercialization, Collaboration and Conflict of Interest: An Institutional Work Analysis of Academic Entrepreneurship in Canada. University of Toronto.
3. Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295-316.
4. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge.
5. Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American journal of medicine, 119(2), 166. e167-166. e116.
6. De Silva, L. (2012). Academic entrepreneurship in a resource constrained environment.
7. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
8. Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information, 52(3), 486-511. doi:10.1177/0539018413485832

9. Etzkowitz, H., & Viale, R. (2010). Polyvalent Knowledge and the Entrepreneurial University: A Third Academic Revolution? Critical Sociology, 36(4), 595-609. doi:10.1177/0896920510365921
10. Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324-327.
11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
12. Gurău, C., Dana, L. P., & Lasch, F. (2012). Academic entrepreneurship in UK biotechnology firms. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 6(2), 154-168. doi:10.1108/17506201211228958
13. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition Prentice Hall.
14. Huyghe, A., & Knockaert, M. (2014). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 138-160. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9333-3
15. Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research policy, 38(6), 922-935.
16. Karakoç, F. Y., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Temel İlkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 40(40).
17. Kilian, T., Schubert, P., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2015). Benefits and Barriers of University Industry Collaborations from a Researcher's Perspective: Development of Formative Scales and Cluster Analysis. Paper presented at the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2015.
18. Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299-309. doi:10.1023/A:1008184601282
19. Knockaert, M., Foo, M. D., Erikson, T., & Cools, E. (2015). Growth intentions among research scientists: A cognitive style perspective. Technovation, 38, 64-74. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.12.001
20. Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411-432.
21. Laukkanen, M. (2003). Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university‐based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 372-382. doi:10.1108/14626000310504684
22. Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and Cross‐Cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
23. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131. doi:10.2307/2392988
24. Lundqvist, M. A., & Williams Middleton, K. L. (2013). Academic entrepreneurship revisited-university scientists and venture creation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(3), 603-617.
25. O'Shea, R., Allen, T. J., O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2004). Universities and Technology Transfer: A Review of Academic Entrepreneurship Literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25(2).
26. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., . . . Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
27. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
28. Peterson, R. A. (2000). Constructing effective questionnaires (Vol. 1): Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA.
29. Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O'Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161-170. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003
30. Prodan, I., & Drnovsek, M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical test. Technovation, 30(5-6), 332-347. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.02.002
31. Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin–offs from public technology sources. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7), 879-893.
32. Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518-533. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005
33. Reynolds, R. A. (2006). Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements: IGI Global. Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Samsom, K. J., & Gurdon, M. A. (1993). University scientists as entrepreneurs: a special case of technology transfer and high-tech venturing. Technovation, 13(2), 63-71.
35. Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation: Edward Elgar Publishing.
36. Thompson, E. R. (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 669-694.
37. Wood, M. S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54(2), 153-161. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.11.004