Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, , 48 - 50, 30.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745

Abstract

References

  • Akbulut, A. (2015) , Karşılaştırılmalı TMS/TFRS-Vergi Uygulamaları ve Sonuçları, İstanbul: Maliye Hesap Uzmanları Derneği: 1213-1219
  • Ciesielski, J. T., & Weirich, T. R. (2015) Revenue Recognition: How It Will Impact Three Key Sectors, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 26(3), pp. 31-39.
  • Çaldağ, Y. (1976), Sigorta İşletmeleri ve Muhasebenin İncelenmesi, Ankara: Ankara İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi Yayınları, Ss. 77
  • Epstein, B. ve Jermakowicz E. (2008), IFRS Policies and Procedures, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc, ss. 86-8
  • 7IAS 17 (2017), https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ifrs/ifrs-17 (Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • IAS 17 Review (2017), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/consolidated/ias17_en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • Insurance Contracts (2017), http://www.ifrs.org/projects/2017/insurance-contracts/,(Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • Karacan, S., (2013), Sigorta İşletmeleri ve Muhasebe Sistemi, S.Aslanoğlu (Ed.) Banka ve Sigorta Muhasebesi, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, SS. 170-196.
  • Kırlıoğlu, H. ve Demirci, Ş. (2016), TMS ve TFRS’ler ile Tam Uyumlu Sigorta Şirketlerinde Muhasebe Uygulamaları, Nobel Yayınları,Ankara, Ss.2-140.
  • Özkan, T. (2007), TDHP Sisteminde Sigorta Muhasebesi, S. Oksay (Ed)., Sigorta Araştırma ve İnceleme Yayınları 10, İstanbul, TSEV, SS.48.Pekiner,
  • PwC, Sigorta Sözleşmeleri Standardı (2017), https://www.pwc.com.tr/tr/hizmetlerimiz/denetim/ufrs-raporlamasi/bultenler/ufrs-17-sigortasozlesmeleri-standardi.html, (Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • Yanık, S. (2016), Sigorta Acentelerinde Yönetim ve Muhasebe Uygulamaları, Seçkin Yayınları, İstanbul, Ss.30-120.
  • Yanık, S. ve Özerhan, Y. (2015), TMS TFRS Açıklamalı ve Örnek Uygulamalı Türkiye Muhasebe Standartları Türkiye Finansal Raporlama Stand., TURMOB Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 30
  • Türkiye Sigorta Birliği (TSB), https://www.tsb.org.tr/sigortacilik-hesap-plani.aspx?pageID=826, (Erişim Tarihi 01.11.2017)

EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES

Year 2017, , 48 - 50, 30.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745

Abstract

Objective-
 The new IFRS 17 “Insurance
Contracts” Standard, which could change the accounting of all enterprises
drawing up insurance contracts and the investment contracts with discretionary
participation feature radically, will be applied in the annual reporting periods
starting on January 1, 2021 or after that date, and replace TFRS 4
"Insurance Contracts" standard that is currently in force. This study
examines the IFRS 17 standard from the viewpoint of the insurance companies,
and also discusses the revisions made within the scope of TFRS 4 that is in
force until the start of the application of the IFRS 17 standard, and the
accompanying right of exemption in application of the TFRS  9 "Financial Instruments" standard.
Since there is no sufficient study on this subject in our country, it is
targeted to contribute to understanding of the subject by including application
examples in this study.

Methodology-
This study uses case method, qualitative interview (in-depth interview),
and review method as the research method. The basic reason for selecting this
method is that the method is appropriate for the aim of the study, and an
effective method investigating a special situation based on insurance
companies systematically in the studies on the “Insurance
Contracts” standard.

Findings-
IFRS 17 will be beneficial for both investors and the insurance companies
by requiring recognition of all insurance contracts consistently, and by
solving the comparison problems created by the TFRS 4. IFRS 17 requires an
up-to-date measurement model in which the estimations are measured again in
each reporting period. The measurement is based on the building blocks of the
discounted, probability-weighted cash flows, a risk correction, and a
contractual service margin representing the unearned profit of the contract.
Within the scope of IFRS 17, the enterprises have an accounting policy option
to recognize the changes in the discount rate or the other assumptions related
to the financial risks in the profit or loss, or in the other comprehensive
income. Within the scope of TFRS 4, on the other hand, it will provide all
companies drawing up insurance contracts with an option to recognize the
fluctuation possible to occur when TFRS 9 is applied before implementation of
the new insurance contracts standard in the other comprehensive income
statement instead of profit or loss.







Conclusion-
The IFRS 17 insurance contracts standard will replace TFRS 4, and ensure
the creation of the single and consistent measurement model that meets the
supplementary disclosure requirements intended for increasing the transparency
for all insurance contracts prepared by the companies issuing reports in
accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards. Within this
scope, the Insurance liabilities will be recognized by using updated values
instead of historical cost, and the readers of financial statements will have
been provided with more effective and accurate information. 

References

  • Akbulut, A. (2015) , Karşılaştırılmalı TMS/TFRS-Vergi Uygulamaları ve Sonuçları, İstanbul: Maliye Hesap Uzmanları Derneği: 1213-1219
  • Ciesielski, J. T., & Weirich, T. R. (2015) Revenue Recognition: How It Will Impact Three Key Sectors, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 26(3), pp. 31-39.
  • Çaldağ, Y. (1976), Sigorta İşletmeleri ve Muhasebenin İncelenmesi, Ankara: Ankara İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi Yayınları, Ss. 77
  • Epstein, B. ve Jermakowicz E. (2008), IFRS Policies and Procedures, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc, ss. 86-8
  • 7IAS 17 (2017), https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ifrs/ifrs-17 (Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • IAS 17 Review (2017), http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/consolidated/ias17_en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • Insurance Contracts (2017), http://www.ifrs.org/projects/2017/insurance-contracts/,(Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • Karacan, S., (2013), Sigorta İşletmeleri ve Muhasebe Sistemi, S.Aslanoğlu (Ed.) Banka ve Sigorta Muhasebesi, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, SS. 170-196.
  • Kırlıoğlu, H. ve Demirci, Ş. (2016), TMS ve TFRS’ler ile Tam Uyumlu Sigorta Şirketlerinde Muhasebe Uygulamaları, Nobel Yayınları,Ankara, Ss.2-140.
  • Özkan, T. (2007), TDHP Sisteminde Sigorta Muhasebesi, S. Oksay (Ed)., Sigorta Araştırma ve İnceleme Yayınları 10, İstanbul, TSEV, SS.48.Pekiner,
  • PwC, Sigorta Sözleşmeleri Standardı (2017), https://www.pwc.com.tr/tr/hizmetlerimiz/denetim/ufrs-raporlamasi/bultenler/ufrs-17-sigortasozlesmeleri-standardi.html, (Erişim Tarihi 30.09.2017)
  • Yanık, S. (2016), Sigorta Acentelerinde Yönetim ve Muhasebe Uygulamaları, Seçkin Yayınları, İstanbul, Ss.30-120.
  • Yanık, S. ve Özerhan, Y. (2015), TMS TFRS Açıklamalı ve Örnek Uygulamalı Türkiye Muhasebe Standartları Türkiye Finansal Raporlama Stand., TURMOB Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 30
  • Türkiye Sigorta Birliği (TSB), https://www.tsb.org.tr/sigortacilik-hesap-plani.aspx?pageID=826, (Erişim Tarihi 01.11.2017)
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Serhat Yanik This is me

Ece Bas This is me

Publication Date December 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

APA Yanik, S., & Bas, E. (2017). EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES. PressAcademia Procedia, 6(1), 48-50. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745
AMA Yanik S, Bas E. EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES. PAP. December 2017;6(1):48-50. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745
Chicago Yanik, Serhat, and Ece Bas. “EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES”. PressAcademia Procedia 6, no. 1 (December 2017): 48-50. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745.
EndNote Yanik S, Bas E (December 1, 2017) EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES. PressAcademia Procedia 6 1 48–50.
IEEE S. Yanik and E. Bas, “EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES”, PAP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 48–50, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745.
ISNAD Yanik, Serhat - Bas, Ece. “EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES”. PressAcademia Procedia 6/1 (December 2017), 48-50. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745.
JAMA Yanik S, Bas E. EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES. PAP. 2017;6:48–50.
MLA Yanik, Serhat and Ece Bas. “EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 6, no. 1, 2017, pp. 48-50, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.745.
Vancouver Yanik S, Bas E. EVALUATION OF IFRS 17 INSURANCE CONTRACTS STANDARDS FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES. PAP. 2017;6(1):48-50.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.