Research Article

RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES

Volume: 8 Number: 1 December 30, 2018
EN

RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to test the weak form efficient market hypothesis in Borsa Istanbul (BIST). We analyze weekly price indices, BIST-100, BIST-Financials, BIST-Industrials, BIST-Service, and BIST Technology over the period January 1988 – September 2018.

Methodology – In addition to well-known unit root tests, we apply adaptive wild bootstrap testing procedures proposed by Cavaliere et al. (2018) and Boswijk and Zu (2018), both considering the non-stationary volatility process.

Findings – The standard unit root tests provide mixed results. However, Carrion-i-Silvestre et al. (2009) and Maki (2015) unit root tests, and adaptive wild bootstrap testing procedures of both Boswijk and Zu’s (2018) and Cavaliere et al. (2018) suggest that all price indices contain unit root at 5% level.

Conclusion- The Turkish stock market is informationally weak-form efficient. The price indices follow a random-walk process; thus, it is fruitless to conduct trading strategies based on past price information to reap excess returns.

Keywords

References

  1. Bachelier, L. (1900). Théorie de la spéculation. Gauthier-Villars.
  2. Balaban, E. (1995a). Informational efficiency of the Istanbul Securities Exchange and some rationale for public regulation. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department Discussion Paper, 9502, 39-67.
  3. Balaban, E. (1995b). Some empirics of the Turkish stock market. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department Discussion Paper, (9508).
  4. Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18.
  5. Basu, S. (1983). The relationship between earnings' yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence. Journal of financial economics, 12(1), 129-156.
  6. Blume, M. E., & Stambaugh, R. F. (1983). Biases in computed returns: An application to the size effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(3), 387-404.
  7. Boswijk, H. P., & Zu, Y. (2018). Adaptive wild bootstrap tests for a unit root with non‐stationary volatility. The Econometrics Journal, 21(2), 87-113.
  8. Buguk, C., & Brorsen, B. W. (2003). Testing weak-form market efficiency: Evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange. International review of financial analysis, 12(5), 579-590.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2018

Submission Date

October 25, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 8 Number: 1

APA
Cagli, E. C. (2018). RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES. PressAcademia Procedia, 8(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977
AMA
1.Cagli EC. RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES. PAP. 2018;8(1):38-42. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977
Chicago
Cagli, Efe Caglar. 2018. “RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES”. PressAcademia Procedia 8 (1): 38-42. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977.
EndNote
Cagli EC (December 1, 2018) RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES. PressAcademia Procedia 8 1 38–42.
IEEE
[1]E. C. Cagli, “RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES”, PAP, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 38–42, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977.
ISNAD
Cagli, Efe Caglar. “RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES”. PressAcademia Procedia 8/1 (December 1, 2018): 38-42. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977.
JAMA
1.Cagli EC. RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES. PAP. 2018;8:38–42.
MLA
Cagli, Efe Caglar. “RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2018, pp. 38-42, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977.
Vancouver
1.Efe Caglar Cagli. RE-VISITING THE TURKISH STOCK MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM ADAPTIVE WILD BOOTSTRAP TESTING PROCEDURES. PAP. 2018 Dec. 1;8(1):38-42. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.977

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to contact@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.