INVESTMENT THROUGH PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP): THE IMPACT OF PPP ACTIVITIES ON THE GROWTH OF GDP

Year 2020, , 150 - 152, 30.07.2020

Hakan Yurdakul Rifat Kamasak

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1257

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between Public Private Partnership (PPP) activities and their impact on Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Methodology- The study employs a time series dataset of Turkey that includes the number of PPP activities and GDP between 1990-2014. The dataset was analyzed by Vector Auto Regression (VAR) method.
Findings- The analysis reveals that there is only a weak association between GDP and PPP.
Conclusion- The reason of this result might be related with the other macroeconomic factors that affect the growth of GDP as a proxy of overall economic development.Moreover, policy makers should consider other benefits of PPP on the way of making positive contributions to the budget constraints, heavily indebtedness, and lack of sufficient funds of countries.

Keywords

Public Private Partnership, investment, GDP, Vector Auto Regression, Turkey

References

• Altug, S., & Firat, M. C. (2018). Borrowing constraints and saving in Turkey. Central Bank Review, 18(1), 1-11.
• Asian Development Bank (2007). Public-Private Partnership Handbook. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/31484/public-private-partnership.pdf
• Calderon, C., Moral-Benito, E., & Luis, S. (2011). Is infrastructure capital productive? A dynamic heterogeneous approach. Policy Research working paper; No. WPS 5682; Paper is funded by the Knowledge for Change Program (KCP). Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Canning, D., & Bennathan, E. (2000). The social rate of return on infrastructure investments. World Bank Working Paper, WPS2390, World Bank, Washington DC.
• Erie, S. P., Kogan, V., & MacKenzie, S. A. (2010). Redevelopment, San Diego Style: The limits of Public—Private Partnerships. Urban Affairs Review, 45(5), 644-678.
• Greve, C. (2003). Public-private partnerships in Scandinavia. International Public Management Review, 4(2), 59-69.
• Hammami, M., Ruhashyankiko, J-F., & Yehoue, E. B. (2006). Determinants of Public Private Partnership in infrastructure. IMF Working Paper, WP/06/99, 1-37.
• Hemming R. (2006). Public-Private Partnerships, Realizing the Potential for Profitable Investment in Africa, High-Level Seminar Organized by the IMF Institute and the Joint Africa Institute, Tunisia. https://www.imf.org/external/np/seminars/eng/2006/rppia/pdf/hemmin.pdf.
• Maurya, D., & Srivastava, A. K. (2019). Managing partner opportunism in public–private partnerships: The dynamics of governance adaptation. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1420-1442.
• Pimentel, I., Aubyn, M., & Ribeiro, N. (2017). The impact of investment in Public Private Partnerships on Public, Private investment and GDP in Portugal, Working Papers Department of Economics 2017/13, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
• Sharma, C. (2012). Determinants of PPP in infrastructure in developing economies. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(2), 149-166.
• The World Bank (2017). The Private Participation in Infrastructure (PPI) Project Database, Washington, DC. https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/ppidata
• The World Bank (2017). World Development Indicators (WDI) Database, Washington, DC. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
• The World Bank (2018). What are Public Private Partnerships? https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/overview/what-are-public-private-partnerships