PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF TURKISH BANKING SECTOR: CAMELS IMPLEMENTATION

Abstract

Purpose- These effects lead to many crises in the country, especially the economic crisis, and may result in serious chaos environments. In order not to experience these situations, the banking sector must be under audit and observation. One of the most important actions to be taken for this audit and observation is the regular measurement of financial performance analysis of banks. CAMELS analysis is a globally accepted system for this performance analysis. Camels analysis measures banks with components of capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, profitability, liquidity and sensitivity to market risks. Methodology- In this study, a total of 16 banks, 2 separate bank groups operating in the Turkish banking sector, 13 of which are private capital banks, 3 of which are Public Banks, were subjected to CAMELS analysis for 16 separate periods taking into account the balance sheets at the end of 2003 and 2018. Findings- According to the results of the study, among the banks, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ziraat Bankası A.Ş., Akbank T.A.Ş. ve Türkiye Garanti Bankası A.Ş. among the groups, it was observed that the group of Public Banks perform a stronger performance than other banks and groups. Conclusion- The fact that all banks and bank groups operating in the Turkish banking sector have a stronger performance in the coming process will undoubtedly create a more appropriate level of economic prosperity for every structure in the state and individual scale in Turkey's economic sense.

Keywords

• Banks
• financial performance
• CAMELS
• Turkish banks
• Basel standards

References

1. Aksoy, T. (2010). Basel ve İç Kontrol (2. b.). Türmob Yayınları.
2. Akyel K. (2002). Yeni Basel Antlaşması Basel II. Active Bankacılık ve Finans Dergisi,Sayı 23, 2002: s.48.
3. Clasessens S. (2001). Financial Restructuring in Banking and Corporate Sector Crises: What Policies To 129 Purpose?. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, No.8386, 2001: pn.1-38.
4. Emek, U. (2002). Devletin Kapasitesi ve İktisadi Kalkınma Sürecindeki İşlevi, Bağımsız Düzenleyici ve Denetleyici Kurumlar ve Türkiye Uygulaması, TÜSİAD Yayınları, No: T/2002-12/349, 2002: s. 58.
5. Erol M. (2007). BASEL- I ve BASEL- II Uzlaşısı’nın Bankalar Tarafından İşletmelere Verilen Kredilerde Risk Yönetimi Aracı Olarak Kullanılması. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (36): 155- 160.
6. Gilbert R. A., Meyer, A. , Andrew P. and Vaughan, M.(2000). The Role of a CAMEL Downgrade Model in Bank Surveillance, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper, No.2000-021A, 2000, pn.1-33.
7. Karabıyık, L. and Anbar, A. (2010). Küresel Ekonomik Krizin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Üzerindeki Etkisi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (46): 44-57.
8. Sarker, A. A. (2006). CAMELS Rating System in the Context of Islamic Banking: A Proposed ‘S’ for Shariah.

9. Sendogdu, A. A. (2010). Basel II Kriterlerinin Dünü Bugünü ve Gelecek İçin Bir Üst Sürümüne Olan İhtiyacın Kaçınılmazlığı. BSAD Bankacılık ve Sigortacılık Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2): 4-13.
10. Van Ray, P. (2012). The Impact of the 1988 Basel Accord on Banks : Capital Ratios and Credit Risk Taking, https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace