Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, , 90 - 90, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361

Abstract

References

  • Procaccino, J. D., Verner, J. M., Shelfer, K. M., & Gefen, D. (2005). What do software practitioners really think about project success:an exploratory study. The Journal of Systems and Software 78.

SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS

Year 2020, , 90 - 90, 31.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361

Abstract

Purpose- The purpose of this quantitative study is to investigate and define project success according to software project participants in the Turkish Information Techology sector. In this study, the effect of different project management methodologies and education levels were also considered.
Methodology- The study employs a quantitative hypothesis-testing method. The survey instrument of Procaccino, Verner, Shelfer and Gefen (2005) was used in this analysis. In collecting the responses, a 5-point Likert-type scale was used to specify the degree of agreement with each written statement (Procaccino, Verner, Shelfer, & Gefen, 2005).
Findings- A total of 211 responses were collected. The demografic analysis shows that 31% (66) of the participants were female and 69% (145) were male. The average age of the survey participants was 33.9 years. The average number of years working in the IT sector was 9.7. Additionally, the analysis showed that 2 responses were missing, and 1 response only included the Kanban method. Interestingly 66 responses (31%) were only Scrum, which is one of the Agile methods. Moreover, 11 responses (5%) were only Waterfall, and 41 responses (19%) included both Waterfall and Scrum. 48.3% (102) of the participants used mixed methods, and 40.8 % (86) used at least one Agile method.
Conclusion- During the analysis of survey results, factor analysis, The Kruskal-Wallis test, correlation analysis, regression analysis were used. Factor analysis was applied and nine factors were found and explained 63.526% of the measurement. These factors were: personal growth, customer requirements, rewards, interpersonal relations, team factors, management, project output, and personal factors. Difference analysis was applied to the demographic variables. As a result, it was found that gender, age group, job position, and education level did not cause a difference in the definition of project success. Work experience created a significant difference in the project output factors and project management methodology created a significant difference in the team factors. As a result of the correlation analysis, in the first correlation, the project output factors and professional growth factors were highly correlated with each other (0.600). The other correlations were as follows: the second correlation is identified between interpersonal relations factors and professional growth factors (0.544), the third correlation was identified between reward and professional growth factors (0.541), the fourth correlation was identified between customers and professional growth factors (0.489), the fifth correlation was identified between team factors and professional growth factors (0.481), and the sixth correlation was identified between personal factors and professional growth factors (0.349). The least correlated variables were the personal and professional growth factors (0.349). According to the regression analysis, the significance was very high (p = 0.008). This meant that the model was statistically significant and a regression equation exists providing a definition for the project success.

References

  • Procaccino, J. D., Verner, J. M., Shelfer, K. M., & Gefen, D. (2005). What do software practitioners really think about project success:an exploratory study. The Journal of Systems and Software 78.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Nilufer Alan Anac This is me

Murat Onuk This is me 0000-0002-9737-7386

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Anac, N. A., & Onuk, M. (2020). SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS. PressAcademia Procedia, 12(1), 90-90. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361
AMA Anac NA, Onuk M. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS. PAP. December 2020;12(1):90-90. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361
Chicago Anac, Nilufer Alan, and Murat Onuk. “SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS”. PressAcademia Procedia 12, no. 1 (December 2020): 90-90. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361.
EndNote Anac NA, Onuk M (December 1, 2020) SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS. PressAcademia Procedia 12 1 90–90.
IEEE N. A. Anac and M. Onuk, “SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS”, PAP, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 90–90, 2020, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361.
ISNAD Anac, Nilufer Alan - Onuk, Murat. “SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS”. PressAcademia Procedia 12/1 (December 2020), 90-90. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361.
JAMA Anac NA, Onuk M. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS. PAP. 2020;12:90–90.
MLA Anac, Nilufer Alan and Murat Onuk. “SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, pp. 90-90, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1361.
Vancouver Anac NA, Onuk M. SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS’ PERCEPTION OF PROJECT SUCCESS. PAP. 2020;12(1):90-.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.