A RESEARCH ON PROJECT MATURITY PERCEPTION OF TECHNO-ENTREPRENEURSHIP FIRMS

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 357 - 368, 30.06.2017

Doguhan Yildiz Hasan Boztoprak Yildiz Guzey

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.555

Abstract

The objective of study is measuring the project maturity levels of
techno­entrepreneurship (start­ups) which was established toward technology
development, and analyzing the relationship between project maturity levels and
demographic features of firms. We used a scale developed by Holmes and Walsh in
2005 to measure project maturity levels. The scale is addressing the maturity
levels based on knowledge areas consisting of scope, time, cost, quality, risk,
human resource, communication and procurement management. The survey was
conducted on the techno­entrepreneurship firms located in Turkey. We did
correlation analysis on the data in SPSS. The results clearly indicate no
relationships between the sectoral differences of firms and project management
knowledge areas. Despite we found partly relationship between age and size
differences of firms and some of project management knowledge areas, the
results dont confirm absolute relationship.

 

Keywords

Techno-entrepreneurship, project maturity model, start-ups, project maturity levels

References

• Artto, Karlos, Iiro Kulvik, Jarno Poskela and Virpi Turkulainen, 2011, “The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, pp. 408–421.
• Bailetti, Tony, 2012, “Technology Entrepreneurship: View, Definition, and Distinctive Aspects”, Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 5-12.
• Barlow, James, 2000, “Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 973–989.
• Beckman, Hristine, Kathy Eisenhardt, Suresh Kotha, Alan Meyer, and Nandini Rajagopalan, 2012, “Technology Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 89-93.
• Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, 2015, Teknogirişim Sermayesi Desteği Uygulama Usul ve Esasları, https://biltek.sanayi.gov.tr/TSD%20Dkmanlar/Uygulama%20Usul%20ve%20Esaslar%C4%B1.pdf Accessed at 09:58, 31.03.2017.
• Bygstad, Bendik and Gjermund Lanestedt, 2009, “ICT based service innovation – A challenge for project management”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, pp. 234–242.
• Chiesa, Vittorio, 2000, “Global R&D project management and organization: a taxonomy”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 341-359.
• Coombs, Rod; Andrew McMeekin and Roger Pybus, 1998, “Toward the development of benchmarking tools for R&D project management”, R&D Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 175 – 186.
• Etzkowitz, Henry, 2003, “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations”, Social Science Information, Vol. 42, pp. 293-337.
• Eurostat, “Total intramural R&D expenditure (GERD) by sectors of performance”, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do Accessed at 18:22, 28.03.2017
• Filippov, Sergey and Herman Mooi, 2010, “Innovation Project Management: A Research Agenda”, RISUS. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, ISSN 2179-3565.
• Gann, D.M., Salter, A., 2000, “Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 55–972.
• Gann, D.M., Salter, A., 1998, “Learning and innovation management in project-based, service-enhanced firms”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vo. 2, pp. 431–454.
• Holmes, Steve J. and Robert T. Walsh, 2005, “Conducting Effective Project Management Maturity Assessment Interviews”, Integrated Management Systems (IMSI TECH 2005).
• İTÜ Arı teknokent, “Teknopark Nedir?”, http://www.ariteknokent.com.tr/tr/nerede/teknopark-nedir Accessed at 15:32, 30.03.2017.
• Kapsali, Maria, 2011, “Systems thinking in innovation project management: A match that Works”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, pp. 396–407.
• Katz, Ralph and Thomas J. Allen, 1985, “Project Performance and the Locus of Influence in the R&D Matrix”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 67-87.
• Keller, Robert T., 1994, “Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No, pp. 167-179.
• Liberatore, Matthew J. and George J. Titus, 1983, “The Practice of Management Science in R&D Project Management”, Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 962-974.
• Manley, K., 2008, “Implementation of innovation by manufacturers subcontracting to construction projects”, Journal of Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 230-245.
• Martinsuo, Miia, Nicole Hensman, Karlos A. Artto, Jaakko Kujala and Ali Jaafari., 2006, “Project-based management as an organizational innovation: drivers, changes and benefits of adopting project-based management”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 87— 97.
• Nokes, Sebastian and Sean Kelly, 2007, “The Definitive Guide to Project Management”, 2nd Edition, London, England, (Prentice Hall/ Financial Times).
• Örnek, Ali Sahin, Yasin Danyal, 2015, “Increased Importance of Entrepreneurship from Entrepreneurship to Techno-Entrepreneurship (Startup): Provided Supports and Conveniences to Techno-Entrepreneurs in Turkey”, World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195, pp. 1146 – 1155.
• Pinto, Jeffrey K. and Dennis Slevin, 1989, “Criticla Success Factors in R&D Projects”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 31-35.
• Prodan, Igor, 2007, “A model of technological entrepreneurship” in Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship (François Thérin Edition), Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall, pp. 26-38.
• PMI Project Management Institute, 2013a, Organizational project management maturity model (OPM3), 3. Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc, USA.
• PMI Project Management Institute, 2013b, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5. Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc, USA.
• PMI Project Management Institute, 2003, Organizational project management maturity model (OPM3), Project Management Institute, Inc, USA.
• Resmi Gazete, (2001), Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri Kanunu, http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2001/07/20010706.htm Accessed at 19:33, 30.03.2017.
• Roja, Alexandru and Marian Nastase, 2014, “Technology Entrepreneurshıp And Entrepreneurıal Strategıes”, Proceedings of the 8th International Management Conference, Bucharest, Romania.
• Shenhar, Aaron J and Dov Dvir, 2007, “Project Management Research-The Challenge And Opportunity”, Project Management Journal, 38, 2. Shenhar, Aaron J and Dov Dvir, 1996, “Toward a Typological Theory of Project Management”, Research Policy, Vol. 25.
• Sicotte, Helene and Ann Langley, 2000, “Integration mechanisms and R&D Project performance”, J. Eng. Technol. Manage., Vol. 17, pp. 1– 37.
• TGBD, Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri Derneği, 2017, http://www.tgbd.org.tr/WebContent/WebContent/4701
• Turkey Statistic Institute, Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1059 Accessed at 12:08, 28.03.2017.
• World Bank, World Development Indicators, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&type=metadata&series=GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS# Accessed at 12:08, 28.03.2017
• World Bank, World Research and development expenditure (% of GDP), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=TR Accessed at 18:53, 28.03.2017.
• Yalçıntaş, Murat, 2014, “Üniversite - Sanayi - Devlet İşbirliğinin Ülke Ekonomilerine Etkileri: Teknopark İstanbul Örneği”, Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, Vol. 5, Iss.: 10, pp. 83-106.
• Zedtwitz, Maximilian von, 2002, “Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R&D”, R&D Management, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 255268.