ANALYSIS OF THE REGIONAL INNOVATION PERFORMANCE BY USING NORMALIZATION METHOD: TR1 (ISTANBUL) EXAMPLE

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 409 - 417, 30.06.2017

Zeynep Karacor Erhan Duman

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.561

Abstract

Today,
economic decision-making units need resources that will provide and improve
economical growth in order to increase social welfare and competition. Within
the economical structure, these resources emerge with knowledge, technology and
innovation. Particularly regional innovation systems play a central role in
meeting the requirements for the resources needed for economic growth. For this
reason, it is important to analyze the relationship of the innovation with the
economic growth in the new world economy, where it appears like a production
factor. In this study, the innovation performance capacity of the TR1 region
has been investigated by using the normalization methods. In this framework, it
is aimed to establish criteria that are comparable to the Level 1 averages of
the regions in Turkey. 

Keywords

Regional, innovation, innovation index, innovation efficiency and normalization method

References

• Aydın, Cüneyt (2012). “MATLAB Lecture Notes” http://www.yildiz.edu.tr/~caydin/publications_dosyalar/Matlab_basic.pdf, Date Of Access: 17.04.2014.
• Cappelin, Riccardo and Wink, Rüdiger (2009). “International Knowledge and Innovation Network ” (1th Edition). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp: 107-111.
• Çakır, Serhat (2012). “Compound R & D and innovation Indicators”.http://ocw.metu.edu.tr/course/view.php?id=186&lang=tr, Date Of Access: 23.03.2017.
• Gömleksiz, Mustafa (2012). “Regional Innovation Systems and Turkey: Region of Level 2 Innovation Index”, Master's Thesis, Selcuk University Institute Of Social Sciences, Konya, pp: 80-110.
• Hu, M-Chih and John A. Mathews (2005). “ National Innovative Capacity in East Asia. MGSM Workıng Papers İn Management Research Policy, 34, pp: 1-58.
• Huggins, Robert (2003). “Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: Regional and Local Benchmarking”. Regional Studies, (37), pp: 89-96.
• Jaffe, B. Adam (1989). Real Effects of Academic Research, The American Economic Review,79 (5), pp: 957-970.
• Kasza, Artur (2004). “ Innovation Networks, Policy Networks, and Regional Development in Transition Economies: A Conceptual Review and Research Perspectives”. Paper for EPSNET Conference, 18-19 June 2004, pp: 1-18.
• Lenger, Aykut. (2008). “Regional Innovation Systems and the Role of the State: Institutional Design and State Universities in Turkey”. European Planning Studies, 16(8), pp: 1101-1120.
• Martin, L. Ronald (2004). “A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness”. Cambridge Econometrics Of Universıty Studies, 44(5), pp: 2-30.
• Niosi, Jorge (2008). “Teknology, Development and İnnovation Systems”: An Introduction, Journal of Development Studies, 44(5), pp: 613621.
• Porter, E. Michael and Stern, Scott (2001). “ National Innovative Capacity. The Global Competitiveness Report” New York: Oxford University Press pp: 1-17.
• Schumpeter, A. Joseph (1939). “Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process”. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp: 84-100
• TDK (Turkish Linguistic Society). (2011). “Glossary Of Economic Terms” Ankara: Publishing House Of The Turkish Language Association, pp: 345-350.
• Wang, J. Jiang, Jing, Y.You, Zhang, F. Chun and Zhao, H. Jun (2009). “ Review On Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Aid In Sustainable Energy Decision-Making”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (13), pp: 2263–2278.