Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 153 - 162, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584

Abstract

Organizations usually apply classical methods of employee performance
evaluation. In this classical system, employee performance depends on work
results, and it is evaluated only as success or failure in job behaviors. The
non-classical performance evaluation methods such as fuzzy logic may mainly be
used to many forms of decision-making including artificial intelligence
systems. This research proposes a new employee performance evaluation method
based on fuzzy logic systems. The process of performance measurement for
evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, and productivity of employees
encompasses data collection, data design, and data analysis stages and it
involves a level of uncertainty associated with performance measures. In
evaluating employee performance, it usually involves granting numerical values
or linguistic labels to employee performance in the organization. The scores
accorded by the appraisers are only approximations, 
which are
then, used to represent each employee’s achievement by reasoning incorporated
in the computational methods. In this paper, the fuzzy logic theory approach is
used to represent the uncertainty caused by performance measures during its
design, use and analysis stages. This research seeks to describe and execute
the fuzzy logic theory approach for decision making in the employee performance
appraisal process. Finally, reasoning based on fuzzy logic theory provides an
alternative way in dealing with imprecise data, which is often reflected in the
way humans think and make judgments in real life.



 

References

  • Adnan Shaout and Jaldip Trivedi (2013). "Performance Appraisal System – Using a Multistage Fuzzy Architecture".International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, Volume 02– Issue 03, pp.405-411, May 2013.
  • Adnan, S. and Minwir, A. (1998). “Fuzzy Logic Modeling for Performance Appraisal Systems – A Framework for Empirical Evaluation”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 323-328, 1998.
  • Adnan Shaout and Mohamed Khalid Yousif (2014). “Employee Performance Appraisal System Using Fuzzy Logic”. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Vol 6, No 4, pp 1-19, August 2014.
  • B. Tutmez, S. Kahraman, O. Gunaydin.(2007)."Multifactorial Fuzzy Approach to the Sawability Classification of Building Stones". Construction and Building Materials 21, (2007), 1672–1679.
  • Chan, D.C.K., Yung, K.L., Ip, A.W.H. (2002). “An Application of Fuzzy Sets to Process Performance Evaluation”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 13 Issue: 4, pp.237-246, 2002.
  • Dubois D, Prade H. (1986).”Weighted Minimum and Maximum Operations in Fuzzy Set Theory”. Information Sciences, 39(2), pp. 205–210.
  • Garibaldi, J.M. and Ifeachor, E.C. (1999). “Application of simulated Annealing Fuzzy Model Tuning to Umbilical Cord Acid-base Interpretation”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 72-84, Feb 1999.
  • G. Gokmen, T. C. Akinci, M. Tektas, N. Onat. G. Kocyigit, N. Tektas,(2010).“Evaluation of Student Performance in Laboratory Applications Using Fuzzy Logic”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2(2010), pp 902-909.
  • Hamid R. Berenji, Pratap S. Khedkar(1998)."Using Fuzzy Logic for Performance Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning".International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 18, pp.131-144,1998.
  • Jing, R.C, Cheng, C. H. and Chen, L. S. (2007). “A Fuzzy-Based Military Officer Performance Appraisal System”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 936-945, 2007.
  • L. A. Zadeh, (1965). “Fuzzy Set,” Information Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965.
  • L. A. Zadeh, (1975). “The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning,” Information Science, Vol. 8, pp. 199-249, 1975.
  • Moon, C., Lee, J., Jeong, C., Lee, J., Park, S. and Lim, S. (2007). “An Implementation Case for the Performance Appraisal and Promotion Ranking”, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Montréal, Canada, 7-10 October 2007.
  • Ramjeet Singh Yadav, Vijendra Pratap Singh (2011)."Modeling Academic Performance Evaluation Using Soft Computing Techniques: A Fuzzy Logic Approach".International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering,Vol. 3, No.2,Feb 2011,pp.676-686.
  • Schweiger, I. and Sumners, G.E. (1994), "Optimizing the Value of Performance Appraisals", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 9 Issue: 8, pp.3-7, 1994.
  • Venclová Kateřina, Šalková Andrea, Koláčková Gabriela (2013).”Identification of Employee Performance Appraisal Methods in Agricultural Organizations”. Journal of Competitiveness.Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 20-36, June 2013.
  • Wenyi Zeng and Shuang Feng (2014)."An Improved Comprehensive Evaluation Model and its Application". International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, 706-714, 2014.
Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 153 - 162, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584

Abstract

References

  • Adnan Shaout and Jaldip Trivedi (2013). "Performance Appraisal System – Using a Multistage Fuzzy Architecture".International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, Volume 02– Issue 03, pp.405-411, May 2013.
  • Adnan, S. and Minwir, A. (1998). “Fuzzy Logic Modeling for Performance Appraisal Systems – A Framework for Empirical Evaluation”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 14, No. 3, p. 323-328, 1998.
  • Adnan Shaout and Mohamed Khalid Yousif (2014). “Employee Performance Appraisal System Using Fuzzy Logic”. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, Vol 6, No 4, pp 1-19, August 2014.
  • B. Tutmez, S. Kahraman, O. Gunaydin.(2007)."Multifactorial Fuzzy Approach to the Sawability Classification of Building Stones". Construction and Building Materials 21, (2007), 1672–1679.
  • Chan, D.C.K., Yung, K.L., Ip, A.W.H. (2002). “An Application of Fuzzy Sets to Process Performance Evaluation”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 13 Issue: 4, pp.237-246, 2002.
  • Dubois D, Prade H. (1986).”Weighted Minimum and Maximum Operations in Fuzzy Set Theory”. Information Sciences, 39(2), pp. 205–210.
  • Garibaldi, J.M. and Ifeachor, E.C. (1999). “Application of simulated Annealing Fuzzy Model Tuning to Umbilical Cord Acid-base Interpretation”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 72-84, Feb 1999.
  • G. Gokmen, T. C. Akinci, M. Tektas, N. Onat. G. Kocyigit, N. Tektas,(2010).“Evaluation of Student Performance in Laboratory Applications Using Fuzzy Logic”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2(2010), pp 902-909.
  • Hamid R. Berenji, Pratap S. Khedkar(1998)."Using Fuzzy Logic for Performance Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning".International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 18, pp.131-144,1998.
  • Jing, R.C, Cheng, C. H. and Chen, L. S. (2007). “A Fuzzy-Based Military Officer Performance Appraisal System”, Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 936-945, 2007.
  • L. A. Zadeh, (1965). “Fuzzy Set,” Information Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338-353, 1965.
  • L. A. Zadeh, (1975). “The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning,” Information Science, Vol. 8, pp. 199-249, 1975.
  • Moon, C., Lee, J., Jeong, C., Lee, J., Park, S. and Lim, S. (2007). “An Implementation Case for the Performance Appraisal and Promotion Ranking”, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Montréal, Canada, 7-10 October 2007.
  • Ramjeet Singh Yadav, Vijendra Pratap Singh (2011)."Modeling Academic Performance Evaluation Using Soft Computing Techniques: A Fuzzy Logic Approach".International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering,Vol. 3, No.2,Feb 2011,pp.676-686.
  • Schweiger, I. and Sumners, G.E. (1994), "Optimizing the Value of Performance Appraisals", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 9 Issue: 8, pp.3-7, 1994.
  • Venclová Kateřina, Šalková Andrea, Koláčková Gabriela (2013).”Identification of Employee Performance Appraisal Methods in Agricultural Organizations”. Journal of Competitiveness.Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 20-36, June 2013.
  • Wenyi Zeng and Shuang Feng (2014)."An Improved Comprehensive Evaluation Model and its Application". International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, 706-714, 2014.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Cemal Ardil

Publication Date June 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ardil, C. (2017). APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584
AMA Ardil C. APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. PAP. June 2017;5(1):153-162. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584
Chicago Ardil, Cemal. “APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT”. PressAcademia Procedia 5, no. 1 (June 2017): 153-62. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584.
EndNote Ardil C (June 1, 2017) APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. PressAcademia Procedia 5 1 153–162.
IEEE C. Ardil, “APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT”, PAP, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 153–162, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584.
ISNAD Ardil, Cemal. “APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT”. PressAcademia Procedia 5/1 (June 2017), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584.
JAMA Ardil C. APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. PAP. 2017;5:153–162.
MLA Ardil, Cemal. “APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 5, no. 1, 2017, pp. 153-62, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.584.
Vancouver Ardil C. APPLYING FUZZY LOGIC THEORY TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. PAP. 2017;5(1):153-62.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.