Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2018, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 213 - 216, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883

Abstract

References

  • Bansal, P., Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165⎼180.
  • Benthaus, J., Risius, M., Beck, R. (2016). Social media management strategies for organizational impression management and their effect on public perception. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(2), 127-139.
  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: a scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187⎼206.
  • Brennan, N. M., Guillamon-Saorin, E., Pierce, A. (2009). Impression management: developing and illustrating a scheme of analysis for narrative disclosures-A methodological note. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(5), 789⎼832.
  • Brennan, N. M., Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2013). Accounting narratives and impression management. The Routledge companion to accounting communication, 109.
  • Chen, Y. Y., Fang, W. (2008), The moderating effect of impression management on the organizational politics–relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 263⎼277.
  • Conlon, D. E., Murray, N. M. (1996). Customer perceptions of corporate responses to product complaints: the role of explanations. Academy of management journal, 39(4), 1040-1056.
  • Guadagno, R. E., Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Gender differences in impression management in organizations: a qualitative review. Sex Roles, 56(7-8), 483-494.
  • Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., Gregarus, G. (2009). An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. Journal of Management. 35(6), 1481⎼1493.
  • Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of business ethics, 27(1-2), 55-68.
  • Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
  • Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2012). Social media: back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 101–104.
  • Lee, K., Oh, W. Y., Kim, N. (2013). Social media for socially responsible firms: analysis of Fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of business ethics, 118(4), 791-806.
  • Lillqvist, E., Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2014). Facing Facebook impression management strategies in company–consumer interactions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(1), 3-30.
  • Lyon, T. P., Montgomery, A. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: the impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of business ethics, 118(4), 747-757.
  • Melloni, G., Stacchezzini, R., Lai, A. (2015). The tone of business model disclosure: an impression management analysis of the integrated reports. Journal of Management and Governance, 20, 295⎼320.
  • Merkl-Davies, D. M., Brennan, N. M. (2011). A conceptual framework of impression management: new insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research, 41(5), 415⎼437.
  • Mohamed, A. A., Gardner, W. L., Paolillo, J. G. (1999). A taxonomy of organizational impression management tactics. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 7(1), 108⎼130. Montecchia, A., Giordano, F., Grieco, C. (2016). Communicating CSR: integrated approach or selfie? Evidence from the Milan stock exchange. Journal of cleaner production, 136, 42-52. Sandberg, M., Holmlund, M. (2015). Impression management tactics in sustainability reporting. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 677⎼689.
  • Schultz, F., Utz, S., Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20–27.
  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Talbot, D., Boiral, O. (2015). Strategies for climate change and impression management: a case study among Canada’s large industrial emitters. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 329-346.
  • Terrell, K. H., Kwok, L. (2011). Organizational impression management behaviors in social media: a perspective of a social networking site. In 16th Graduate Student Research Conference in Hospitality and Tourism. en: http://works. bepress. com/linchi_kwok/1
  • Tyler, J. M., Connaughton, S. L., Desrayaud, N., Fedesco, H. N. (2012). Organizational impression management: utilizing anticipatory tactics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 336-348.
  • Yang, J. H., Liu, S. (2017). Accounting narratives and impression management on social media. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), 673-694.
  • Zhang, J. (2015). Voluntary information disclosure on social media. Decision Support Systems, 73, 28-36.

SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Year 2018, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 213 - 216, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883

Abstract

Purpose- The main purpose of this study is to understand companies’ sustainability disclosures on social media from the perspectives of impression management tactics at organizational level.

Methodology- This study is theoretical to meet the requriements about call for studies of the corporate use of social media by looking at sustainability mechanism and organizational impression management. Also, it has a desire to make a preposition about further qualitative and quantitative studies in Turkish organizations by analyzing corporate social media accounts

Findings- Companies want to give the impression of being a sustainable actor by balancing the favorable and unfavorable information they give to their stakeholders. For this reason, organizations can use sustainability narratives as a way to formalize their stakeholders’ expectations or manipulate their perceptions on social media. Social media are among the best ways to communicate with the stakeholders of companies. They allow organizations to engage in timely and direct contact at low cost and with higher levels of efficiency than traditional communication tools. Bu using impression management tactics as assertive and defensive, they can project a positive impression of their social and environmental performance on social media platform.

Conclusion- Our theoretical suggestions demonstrate that social media provides a favorable communication environment to the sustainable firms. Also by this way, this study makes a better understanding of corporate self-presentational behaviours on social media and the effecf of stakeholder perception among social media users.

References

  • Bansal, P., Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165⎼180.
  • Benthaus, J., Risius, M., Beck, R. (2016). Social media management strategies for organizational impression management and their effect on public perception. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(2), 127-139.
  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: a scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187⎼206.
  • Brennan, N. M., Guillamon-Saorin, E., Pierce, A. (2009). Impression management: developing and illustrating a scheme of analysis for narrative disclosures-A methodological note. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(5), 789⎼832.
  • Brennan, N. M., Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2013). Accounting narratives and impression management. The Routledge companion to accounting communication, 109.
  • Chen, Y. Y., Fang, W. (2008), The moderating effect of impression management on the organizational politics–relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 263⎼277.
  • Conlon, D. E., Murray, N. M. (1996). Customer perceptions of corporate responses to product complaints: the role of explanations. Academy of management journal, 39(4), 1040-1056.
  • Guadagno, R. E., Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Gender differences in impression management in organizations: a qualitative review. Sex Roles, 56(7-8), 483-494.
  • Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., Gregarus, G. (2009). An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. Journal of Management. 35(6), 1481⎼1493.
  • Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of business ethics, 27(1-2), 55-68.
  • Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
  • Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2012). Social media: back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 101–104.
  • Lee, K., Oh, W. Y., Kim, N. (2013). Social media for socially responsible firms: analysis of Fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of business ethics, 118(4), 791-806.
  • Lillqvist, E., Louhiala-Salminen, L. (2014). Facing Facebook impression management strategies in company–consumer interactions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(1), 3-30.
  • Lyon, T. P., Montgomery, A. W. (2013). Tweetjacked: the impact of social media on corporate greenwash. Journal of business ethics, 118(4), 747-757.
  • Melloni, G., Stacchezzini, R., Lai, A. (2015). The tone of business model disclosure: an impression management analysis of the integrated reports. Journal of Management and Governance, 20, 295⎼320.
  • Merkl-Davies, D. M., Brennan, N. M. (2011). A conceptual framework of impression management: new insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research, 41(5), 415⎼437.
  • Mohamed, A. A., Gardner, W. L., Paolillo, J. G. (1999). A taxonomy of organizational impression management tactics. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 7(1), 108⎼130. Montecchia, A., Giordano, F., Grieco, C. (2016). Communicating CSR: integrated approach or selfie? Evidence from the Milan stock exchange. Journal of cleaner production, 136, 42-52. Sandberg, M., Holmlund, M. (2015). Impression management tactics in sustainability reporting. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 677⎼689.
  • Schultz, F., Utz, S., Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20–27.
  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Talbot, D., Boiral, O. (2015). Strategies for climate change and impression management: a case study among Canada’s large industrial emitters. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 329-346.
  • Terrell, K. H., Kwok, L. (2011). Organizational impression management behaviors in social media: a perspective of a social networking site. In 16th Graduate Student Research Conference in Hospitality and Tourism. en: http://works. bepress. com/linchi_kwok/1
  • Tyler, J. M., Connaughton, S. L., Desrayaud, N., Fedesco, H. N. (2012). Organizational impression management: utilizing anticipatory tactics. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 336-348.
  • Yang, J. H., Liu, S. (2017). Accounting narratives and impression management on social media. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), 673-694.
  • Zhang, J. (2015). Voluntary information disclosure on social media. Decision Support Systems, 73, 28-36.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emel Esen This is me 0000-0001-5753-3252

Arzu Ozsozgun Caliskan This is me 0000-0001-6209-4952

Publication Date September 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Esen, E., & Caliskan, A. O. (2018). SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. PressAcademia Procedia, 7(1), 213-216. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883
AMA Esen E, Caliskan AO. SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. PAP. September 2018;7(1):213-216. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883
Chicago Esen, Emel, and Arzu Ozsozgun Caliskan. “SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA”. PressAcademia Procedia 7, no. 1 (September 2018): 213-16. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883.
EndNote Esen E, Caliskan AO (September 1, 2018) SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. PressAcademia Procedia 7 1 213–216.
IEEE E. Esen and A. O. Caliskan, “SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA”, PAP, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 213–216, 2018, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883.
ISNAD Esen, Emel - Caliskan, Arzu Ozsozgun. “SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA”. PressAcademia Procedia 7/1 (September 2018), 213-216. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883.
JAMA Esen E, Caliskan AO. SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. PAP. 2018;7:213–216.
MLA Esen, Emel and Arzu Ozsozgun Caliskan. “SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, pp. 213-6, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.883.
Vancouver Esen E, Caliskan AO. SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURES AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA. PAP. 2018;7(1):213-6.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.