Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Aeronautical and Space Engineers from the Eyes of Sixth Grade Students

Year 2019, , 1 - 21, 03.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.417832

Abstract

The purpose of this study
is to identify middle-school students’ perception of aeronautical and space engineers. The study group
of the study which is a descriptive survey model consists of 50 6th grade
middle-school students located in the Adilcevaz District of Bitlis Province. In
the study, a drawing form and the ‘Who are Aeronautical and Space Engineers?’ form have been used as data collection
tools. In the analysis of data, content analysis and descriptive analysis have
been used. As a result of the study, it has been determined that a majority of
the students had misconceptions about what aeronautical and space engineers do.
In addition, it has been concluded that the students have a stereotypical
gender perception about engineers. In the light of these findings, the
importance of introducing different engineering areas such as aeronautical and
space engineering to the students in forming a career awareness about engineering
and the inclusion of the applications in these areas in educational
environments has been underlined.

References

  • Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I. & Weller J. (2011). What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.
  • Carr, R. L., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Horstman, B. (2012). Change in elementary student conceptions of engineering following an intervention as seen from the draw-an engineer test. Paper presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative research (3rd Ed.). NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students' conceptions of engineering and technology. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
  • Çelik, A. (2012). Avrupa Birliği ve Avrupa Uzay Ajansı ile Türkiye’nin uzay ilişkileri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hava Harp Okulu Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Enstitüsü.
  • Çetin, B, Y., & Asiltürk, E. (2017). Ortaokul beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin mühendislik imajları. The Journal of New Trends in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 55-66.
  • Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(6), 582-601.
  • Engineering is Elementary (EIE) (2017). "Paracuthes Student Assesments" 21.04.2018 tarihinde https://www.eie.org/eie-curriculum/resources/designing-parachutes-pa adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Ergün, A. ve Balçın, M. D. (2018a). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin mühendis algılarının çizimler aracılığıyla belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Kongresi, 23-25 Mart, Afyon.
  • Ergün, A. & Balçın, M. D. (2018b). Perceptions and attitudes of secondary school students towards engineers and engineering. Journal of Education and Practice. (In press).
  • Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-008-9133-3
  • Frehill, L.M. (1997). Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(2), 225-249.
  • Gibbin, R. D., & Davis, L. A. (Eds.). (2002). Raising public awareness of engineering. National Academies Press.
  • Gibbons, S. J., Hirsch, L. S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., & Bloom, J. (2004, October). Middle school students' attitudes to and knowledge about engineering. In International conference on engineering education, Gainesville, FL.
  • Karatas, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth-grade students’ views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123–135.
  • Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Leonard, M. J. (2004). Toward epistemologically authentic engineering design activities in the science classroom. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, B.C.
  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). 11 Ekim 2017 tarihinde http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: TIES. 07.04.2018 tarihinde http://www.wythe-excellence.org/media/STEM_Articles.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
  • ODTÜ (2018). Havacılık ve uzay mühendisliği bölümü. 11.04.2018 tarihinde http://ae.metu.edu.tr/about/sss.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Oware, E. A., Capobianco, B. M., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2007). Young children’s perceptions of engineers before and after a summer engineering outreach course. Paper presented at the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Roberg, O. A. & Collett, J. P. (2004). “HSR-35 Norwegian Space Activities 1958-2003 – A Historical Overview”, ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, Hollanda.
  • Rutherford, F. J. (1997). Sputnik and science education. In Symposium “Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform”. Washington, DC.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). (2010). Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK.
  • Ünlü, Z. K., & Dökme, İ. (2016). Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin FeTeMM’in Mühendisliği Hakkındaki İmajları. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 196-204.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Altıncı Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Gözünden Havacılık ve Uzay Mühendisi

Year 2019, , 1 - 21, 03.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.417832

Abstract



Bu araştırmanın amacı
ortaokul öğrencilerinin havacılık ve uzay mühendisi algılarını belirlemektir.
Betimsel tarama modelindeki araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Bitlis İli Adilcevaz
ilçesinde bulunan bir ortaokuldaki 50 altıncı sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır.
Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak bir çizim formu ile “Havacılık ve Uzay
Mühendisi Kimdir?” formu kullanılmıştır. Veri analizinde içerik analizi ile
betimsel analizden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda öğrencilerin büyük
çoğunluğunun havacılık ve uzay mühendisinin yaptığı işlere yönelik yanlış
kavramalarının olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin mühendise yönelik
basmakalıp cinsiyet algısına sahip oldukları sonucu elde edilmiştir. Bu
bulguların ışığında mühendisliğe ilişkin kariyer bilinci oluşturmada havacılık
ve uzay mühendisliği gibi farklı mühendislik alanlarının öğrencilere
tanıtılması ve bu alanlara yönelik uygulamaların eğitim ortamlarında yer
almasının önemi vurgulanmıştır. 



References

  • Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I. & Weller J. (2011). What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.
  • Carr, R. L., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Horstman, B. (2012). Change in elementary student conceptions of engineering following an intervention as seen from the draw-an engineer test. Paper presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative research (3rd Ed.). NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students' conceptions of engineering and technology. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
  • Çelik, A. (2012). Avrupa Birliği ve Avrupa Uzay Ajansı ile Türkiye’nin uzay ilişkileri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hava Harp Okulu Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Enstitüsü.
  • Çetin, B, Y., & Asiltürk, E. (2017). Ortaokul beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin mühendislik imajları. The Journal of New Trends in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 55-66.
  • Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(6), 582-601.
  • Engineering is Elementary (EIE) (2017). "Paracuthes Student Assesments" 21.04.2018 tarihinde https://www.eie.org/eie-curriculum/resources/designing-parachutes-pa adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Ergün, A. ve Balçın, M. D. (2018a). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin mühendis algılarının çizimler aracılığıyla belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Kongresi, 23-25 Mart, Afyon.
  • Ergün, A. & Balçın, M. D. (2018b). Perceptions and attitudes of secondary school students towards engineers and engineering. Journal of Education and Practice. (In press).
  • Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-008-9133-3
  • Frehill, L.M. (1997). Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(2), 225-249.
  • Gibbin, R. D., & Davis, L. A. (Eds.). (2002). Raising public awareness of engineering. National Academies Press.
  • Gibbons, S. J., Hirsch, L. S., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., & Bloom, J. (2004, October). Middle school students' attitudes to and knowledge about engineering. In International conference on engineering education, Gainesville, FL.
  • Karatas, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth-grade students’ views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123–135.
  • Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Leonard, M. J. (2004). Toward epistemologically authentic engineering design activities in the science classroom. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, B.C.
  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). 11 Ekim 2017 tarihinde http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: TIES. 07.04.2018 tarihinde http://www.wythe-excellence.org/media/STEM_Articles.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
  • ODTÜ (2018). Havacılık ve uzay mühendisliği bölümü. 11.04.2018 tarihinde http://ae.metu.edu.tr/about/sss.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Oware, E. A., Capobianco, B. M., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2007). Young children’s perceptions of engineers before and after a summer engineering outreach course. Paper presented at the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Roberg, O. A. & Collett, J. P. (2004). “HSR-35 Norwegian Space Activities 1958-2003 – A Historical Overview”, ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, Hollanda.
  • Rutherford, F. J. (1997). Sputnik and science education. In Symposium “Reflecting on Sputnik: Linking the Past, Present, and Future of Educational Reform”. Washington, DC.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). (2010). Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK.
  • Ünlü, Z. K., & Dökme, İ. (2016). Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin FeTeMM’in Mühendisliği Hakkındaki İmajları. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 196-204.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Muhammed Balçın 0000-0002-7698-6932

Ayşegül Ergün 0000-0002-1481-4019

Publication Date January 3, 2019
Submission Date April 23, 2018
Acceptance Date September 27, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Balçın, M., & Ergün, A. (2019). Altıncı Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Gözünden Havacılık ve Uzay Mühendisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(45), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.417832