Research Article

Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality

Number: 51 January 14, 2021
TR EN

Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of video-based feedback on perceived feedback quality and in addition, to determine the opinions of students about the video feedback practice. This study was carried out for 10 weeks with 38 undergraduate students from Computer Education and Instructional Technology department in a public university in “Information Security and Ethics” course. A convergent parallel mixed-methods study design was adopted in this study. In the first 6 weeks of the study, students in the experimental group received video feedback on three weekly written assignments while those in the control group received text feedback. Students were applied “Formative Feedback Perception Scale” after each week's assignment to determine their perceived feedback quality. During the 6-8 weeks of the study, experimental and control groups were switched in terms of the feedback format so that all students could experience video and text feedback. Meanwhile, students were given two additional assignments. Quantitative findings of the study revealed that video feedback had a statistically significant effect on perceived feedback quality and its “development, understandability, and encouragement” sub-factors. Qualitative findings also showed that video feedback was often found to be more advantageous than text feedback in terms of perceived feedback quality. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended to consider the use of videos in the feedback practices.

Keywords

Feedback, video feedback, text feedback, perceived feedback quality, university students

References

  1. Anson, I. G. (2015). Assessment feedback using screen capture technology in political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(4), 375-390.
  2. Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide: A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  3. Bonnel, W. (2008). Improving feedback to students in online courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(5), 290-294.
  4. Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Velasquez, A. (2011). The use of asynchronous video communication to improve instructor immediacy and social presence in a blended learning environment. In Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation (pp. 38-57). IGI Global.
  5. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195-203. Borup, J., West, R. E., Thomas, R., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 232-256.
  6. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712.
  7. Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & L. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 90–103). London: Routledge.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  9. Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., ... & Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers & Education, 58(1), 386-396.
  10. Demiraslan-Çevik, Y., Haşlaman, T., & Çelik, S. (2015). The effect of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 44, 23-35.
APA
Yiğit, M. F., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51, 92-122. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.707224
AMA
1.Yiğit MF, Seferoğlu SS. Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality. PUJE. 2021;(51):92-122. doi:10.9779/pauefd.707224
Chicago
Yiğit, Mehmet Fatih, and Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu. 2021. “Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, nos. 51: 92-122. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.707224.
EndNote
Yiğit MF, Seferoğlu SS (January 1, 2021) Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 51 92–122.
IEEE
[1]M. F. Yiğit and S. S. Seferoğlu, “Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality”, PUJE, no. 51, pp. 92–122, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.9779/pauefd.707224.
ISNAD
Yiğit, Mehmet Fatih - Seferoğlu, Süleyman Sadi. “Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 51 (January 1, 2021): 92-122. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.707224.
JAMA
1.Yiğit MF, Seferoğlu SS. Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality. PUJE. 2021;:92–122.
MLA
Yiğit, Mehmet Fatih, and Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu. “Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 51, Jan. 2021, pp. 92-122, doi:10.9779/pauefd.707224.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Fatih Yiğit, Süleyman Sadi Seferoğlu. Investigating the Effect of Video-Based Feedback on Perceived Feedback Quality. PUJE. 2021 Jan. 1;(51):92-122. doi:10.9779/pauefd.707224