EN
TR
DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has presented an extraordinary and unprecedented situation. Countries worldwide have been trying to find the most effective solutions to end the pandemic. Different approaches to combat the virus have emerged. Among these, China has become the prime example of an authoritarian model of virus management, whereas South Korea managed to slow down the pandemic with a liberal approach. The two countries, albeit both highly successful in pandemic management, have different and even contrasting images in the international area. This study analyzes how China’s and Korea’s pandemic management models and their international reception differ from each other. While both models were largely applauded domestically, in the international sphere, China, after early acclaim, ended up with a more negative and controversial image, whereas South Korea created a relatively more positively regarded model. Still, compared to the Korean model, the Chinese model was emulated and implemented by many more countries worldwide.
Keywords
References
- Bae, Y. (2016). “Ideas, Interests and Practical Authority in Reform Politics: Decentralization Reform in South Korea in the 2000s”, Asian Journal of Political Science, 24/1, 63-86.
- BBC (2020a). Coronavirus: China Says Disease ‘Curbed’ in Wuhan and Hubei. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51813876.
- BBC (2020b). Coronavirus: Trump Moves to Pull US Out of World Health Organization. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53327906.
- BBC (2020c). Australia Accuses China of Undermining Trade Agreement. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-55240898.
- BBC (2020d). China Covid-19: How State Media and Censorship Took on Coronavirus. Retrieved April 12, 2021, from bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55355401.
- BBC (2021). Chinese Official Says Local Vaccines ‘Don’t Have High Protection Rates. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-56713663.
- Bulman, D. J. & K. A. Jaros (2021). “Localism in Retreat? Central-Provincial Relations in the Xi Jinping Era”, Journal of Contemporary China. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2021.1889228.
- Bouey, J. (2020). China’s Health System Reform and Global Health Strategy in the Context of COVID-19, Retrieved May 25, 2021, from https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CTA321-1.html.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Political Science
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
May 10, 2023
Publication Date
May 22, 2023
Submission Date
May 20, 2022
Acceptance Date
November 6, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Number: 56
APA
Demir, E., & Çelik, H. (2023). DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 56, 101-122. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119216
AMA
1.Demir E, Çelik H. DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA. PAUSBED. 2023;(56):101-122. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1119216
Chicago
Demir, Emre, and Hatice Çelik. 2023. “DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, nos. 56: 101-22. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119216.
EndNote
Demir E, Çelik H (May 1, 2023) DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 56 101–122.
IEEE
[1]E. Demir and H. Çelik, “DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA”, PAUSBED, no. 56, pp. 101–122, May 2023, doi: 10.30794/pausbed.1119216.
ISNAD
Demir, Emre - Çelik, Hatice. “DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 56 (May 1, 2023): 101-122. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1119216.
JAMA
1.Demir E, Çelik H. DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA. PAUSBED. 2023;:101–122.
MLA
Demir, Emre, and Hatice Çelik. “DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 56, May 2023, pp. 101-22, doi:10.30794/pausbed.1119216.
Vancouver
1.Emre Demir, Hatice Çelik. DIVERGENT MODELS OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL RECEPTION: CASES OF CHINA AND SOUTH KOREA. PAUSBED. 2023 May 1;(56):101-22. doi:10.30794/pausbed.1119216