THE MEDIATING ROLE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE IMPACT OF VOTER INVOLVEMENT ON VOTING INTENTION

Abstract

Voter interest and behavior are among the key determinants of democratic participation in political processes. The literature indicates that voter involvement is associated with various demographic, psychological, and communicative factors, while social media is recognized as an influential tool both in acquiring political knowledge and shaping voting behavior. This study examines the impact of voter involvement on voting intention and evaluates the mediating role of social media in this relationship. Data were collected from 405 participants who had voted in at least one election in Turkiye, using a convenience sampling method and a structured questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling via SPSS and AMOS software. The findings reveal that voter involvement does not have a significant direct effect on voting intention; however, it has an indirect effect through social media use. The results demonstrate that social media assumes a full mediating role between voter involvement and voting intention. The study highlights the critical role of digital platforms in political communication strategies and contributes to the literature on understanding voter behavior.

Keywords

• Voter Involvement
• Voter intention
• Social media

SEÇMEN İLGİLENİMİNİN OY VERME NİYETİNE ETKİSİNDE SOSYAL MEDYANIN ARACI ROLÜ

Abstract

Siyasal süreçlerde seçmen ilgisi ve davranışları, demokratik katılımın temel belirleyicileri arasında yer almaktadır. Alan yazında seçmen ilgileniminin demografik, psikolojik ve iletişimsel birçok unsurla ilişkili olduğu belirtilmekte; sosyal medyanın ise hem siyasal bilginin edinilmesinde hem de oy verme davranışının şekillenmesinde etkili bir araç olduğu kabul edilmektedir. Araştırmada, seçmen ilgileniminin oy verme niyeti üzerindeki etkisi incelenmekte ve bu ilişkide sosyal medyanın aracı rolü değerlendirilmektedir. Türkiye’de en az bir seçimde oy kullanmış 405 katılımcıdan elde edilen veriler, kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenmiş katılımcılardan anket yoluyla toplanmış ve SPSS ile AMOS programları kullanılarak kovaryans temelli yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, seçmen ilgileniminin oy verme niyeti üzerinde doğrudan anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığını, ancak sosyal medya kullanımı aracılığıyla dolaylı bir etki yarattığını ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, sosyal medyanın seçmen ilgilenimi ile oy verme niyeti arasında tam aracılık rolü üstlendiğini göstermektedir. Araştırma, dijital platformların siyasi iletişim stratejilerindeki önemine vurgu yapmakta ve seçmen davranışını anlamaya yönelik literatüre katkı sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Seçen ilgilenimi
• Oy verme niyeti
• Sosyal medya

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma herhangi bir kurum veya kuruluş tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etik Kurulu’nun 25.02.2025 tarihli, 6 sayılı ve 5 numaralı kararı ile etik onay almıştır. Katılımcılardan açık rıza alınmış ve araştırma süreci etik kurallara uygun yürütülmüştür.

References

1. Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111531
2. Altunışık, R., Boz, H., & Gegez, E. (2022). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: Yeni Perspektifler. www.seckkn.com.tr
3. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı. Sakarya yayıncılık.
4. Arınç, K. (2010). Siyasî ve tarihî coğrafya perspektifiyle: Türkiye’nin terör sorununun analizi ve jeopolitik-jeostratejik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(2), 1–34.
5. Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210381738
6. Bannon, D. P. (2005). Electoral Participation and Non-Voter Segmentation. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 14(1–2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v14n01_07
7. Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2010). MyFaceTube Politics. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439309334325
8. BBC Türkçe. (2024). Basın Özgürlüğü Endeksi. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/c0v0r3rd2jgo

9. Beatty, S. E., Homer, P., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). The involvement—commitment model: Theory and implications. Journal of Business Research, 16(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(88)90039-2
10. Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, communication & society, 18(5), 524-538.
11. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
12. Breux, S., Couture, J., & Goodman, N. (2016). Fewer voters, higher stakes? The applicability of rational choice for voter turnout in Quebec municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676272
13. Brinson, N. H., Eastin, M. S., & Cicchirillo, V. J. (2018). Reactance to personalization: Understanding the drivers behind the growth of ad blocking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(2), 136–147.
14. Burton, S., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1992). The effect of enduring, situational, and response involvement on preference stability in the context of voting behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 9(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220090205
15. Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative and arts-informed perspectives.
16. Congge, U., Guillamón, M. D., Nurmandi, A., Salahudin, & Sihidi, I. T. (2023). Digital democracy: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 972802.
17. David Kennamer, J. (1987). How Media Use During Campaign Affects the Intent to Vote. 291–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400202
18. Demir, Y. (2022). Siyasal iletişimde dijital propaganda araçları: Botlar. Siyasal İletişim Çalışmaları. Tablet Kitabevi.
19. Demirkanoğlu, Y. (2020). Hukukun üstünlüğü bakımından Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği karnesi: 10-11 Aralık 1999 Helsinki Zirvesi sonrası dönem üzerine bir inceleme. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 161–714.
20. De-Oliveira, M., De Almeida, C. M., & Mainardes, E. W. (2022). Politics and social media: an analysis of factors anteceding voting intention. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 19(2), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12208-021-00301-7/FIGURES/2
21. Dermody, J., Hanmer‐Lloyd, S., & Scullion, R. (2010). Young people and voting behavior: alienated youth and (or) an interested and critical citizenry? European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020507
22. Dunn, S. W. L., Butler, S., Meeks, K., & Collier, J. (2015). Communication quarterly rockin’ the gubernatorial vote: young people’s normative democratic attitudes and behaviors in a low-involvement election. Communication Quarterly, 63(5), 603–619.
23. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2024). Democracy index 2023: Age of conflict. The Economist Group. https://d1qqtien6gys07.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Democracy-Index-2023-Final-report-11-15.pdf
24. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
25. Elma, F. (2007). Türkiye’nin Belediyecilik Deneyimi ve Azerbaycan Belediyeciliği. Journal of Qafqaz University, 20.
26. Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European journal of communication, 32(1), 50-61.
27. Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited.
28. Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the Prediction of Behavior. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. John Wiley.
29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1, 39–50.
30. Freedom House. (2024). Freedom in the world 2024: Turkey. https://freedomhouse.org/country/turkey/freedom-world/2024
31. Ganduri, R. N., Reddy, E. L., & Reddy, T. N. (2020). Social Media as a Marketing Tool for Political Purpose and Its Implications on Political Knowledge, Participation, and Interest. International Journal of Online Marketing, 10(3), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijom.2020070102
32. Gangadharbatla, H., & Valafar, M. (2017). ‘Propagation of user-generated content online. American Political Science Review, 11(3), 21–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1956441
33. Gburova, J., Gavurova, B., Bacik, R., & Tomasova, M. (2023). Analysis of the impact of advertising on the change of voter behavior of consumers (voters) in the Slovak Republic. Marketing i Menedžment Innovacij, 14(3), 134–141.
34. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2024). IBM SPSS Statistics 29 Step by Step. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032622156
35. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Green, M. (2003). Partisan mail and voter turnout: results from randomized field experiments. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00029-X
36. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of communication, 64(4), 612-634.
37. Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (Eds.). (2021). Youth and politics in times of increasing inequalities. Palgrave Macmillan.
38. Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E., & Lunney, C. A. (2009). The Influence of Perceived Social Norms on College Students’ Intention to Vote. Political Communication, 26(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802622860
39. Gürbüz, G., & Sayımer, İ. (2023). Türkiye'de seçmenlerin yeni medya ortamlarında siyasal katılım pratikleri. Uluslararası İnsan Çalışmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 175–194.
40. Hair, H. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). www.cengage.com/highered
41. Hair, J. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Exploratory factor analysis.
42. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
43. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x
44. Ilgaz, C., & Abay, İ. (2020). Türkiye’de yeni medya ortamı ve dijital oyun olgusu. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 4(1), 1–9.
45. Jackson, N. A., & Lilleker, D. G. (2004). Just Public Relations or an Attempt at Interaction? European Journal of Communication, 19(4), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104047671
46. Kizgin, H., Jamal, A., Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Weerakkody, V. (2019). The impact of social networking sites on socialization and political engagement: Role of acculturation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2018.09.010
47. Kline, R. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guildford Press.
48. Kocaman, R., & Coşgun, M. (2024). Political Marketing and Voting Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Political Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2024.2374253
49. Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford university press.
50. Krejcie, R. V. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational Psychol Meas.
51. Kumar, R., Novak, J., & Tomkins, A. (2006). Structure and evolution of online social networks. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1145/1150402.1150476
52. Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2013). Did social media really matter? College students' use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. In New media, campaigning and the 2008 Facebook election, 55-78. Routledge.
53. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001). Political marketing and British political parties: The party's just begun. Manchester University Press.
54. Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature human behavior, 7(1), 74-101.
55. McDonnell, J., & Taylor, P. J. (2014). Value Creation in Political Exchanges: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Political Marketing, 13(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.929884
56. Meydan C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
57. Moslehpour, M., Tiwari, A. K., & Ebrahimi Pourfaez, S. (2024). The effect of social media marketing on voting intention; an application of multidimensional panel data. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2022-1250
58. Newman, P. (2007). American Voters’ Statements of Positive and Negative Preference for Candidates and Parties 1980–2000. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2–3), 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v06n02_07
59. O’Cass, A. (1999). Exploring purchase decision involvement’s influence on product knowledge and confidence. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy, 1–8.
60. O’Cass, A. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of a revised version of the Lennox and Wolfe revised self-monitoring scale. Psychology and Marketing, 17(5), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200005)17:5<397::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-D
61. O’Cass, A. (2002). A Micromodel of Voter Choice: Understanding the Dynamics of Australian Voter Characteristics in a Federal Election. Psychology and Marketing, 19(12), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10051
62. O’Cass, A. (2005). Political campaign advertising: Believe it or not. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 14(1–2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v14n01_12
63. Olgun, K. (2011). Türkiye’de Cumhuriyetin İlanından 1950’ye Genel Seçim Uygulamaları. Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, 27(79), 1–36.
64. Özdamar, K. (2017). Ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi IBM SPSS, IBM SPSS AMOS ve MINTAB uygulamalı. Nisan Kitabevi.
65. Özkan, M. A. (2024). Atatürk Üniversitesi öğrencileri arasında sosyal medya kullanımının siyasi tutumlara etkisi: Y ve Z kuşakları üzerine bir analiz. Veche Dergisi, 9(1), 35–52.
66. Özmen, Y. P. (2022). Dijital çağda siyasal katılım: Toplumsal hareketler ve siyasi partiler. Mülkiye Dergisi, 46(1), 87–110
67. Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003
68. Pepe, M. M. (2022). Sosyal medyanın gençlerin siyasi tutumuna etkisi. Duvar Yayınları.
69. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 19,123-205. Academic Press.
70. Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The Effect of Internet Use on Political Participation. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307312631
71. Scammell, M. (2024). Populism and political marketing: Is the discipline still relevant? International Journal of Market Research, 67(2-3), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241309765
72. Searles, S., Hilton, K., & Medina, A. (2025). Barriers and hardships: Why some youth didn’t vote in 2024. CIRCLE, Tufts University. Contributed by Ruby Belle Booth. Retrieved from https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/barriers-and-hardships-why-some-youth-didnt-vote-2024
73. Shama, A. (1974). Political marketing: a study of voter decision-making process and candidate marketing strategy. Annual Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, 764–777.
74. Smith, M. F., & Carsky, M. L. (1996). Grocery shopping behavior A comparison of involved and uninvolved consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 3(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-6989(95)00048-8
75. Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291.
76. Sunstein, C. R. (2020). Too much information: understanding what you don't want to know. MIT Press.
77. Şen, İ. G. (2020). Demokrasi ve siyasal katılım. Sivil Toplum Geliştirme Merkezi Yayını.
78. Talas, M. (2011). Sivil toplum kuruluşları ve Türkiye perspektifi. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 29, 387–401.
79. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561. https://doi.org/10.2307/249633
80. Toktok, N. (2010). Türkiye’de demokrasi kültürü. Turan-Sam, 2(7), 135–142.
81. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2023). Nüfus projeksiyonları 2023-2100. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Nufus-Projeksiyonlari-2023-2100-53699
82. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2024). Dünya Nüfus Günü 2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dunya-Nufus-Gunu-2024-53680
83. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2025). Nüfus ve Demografi. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Nufus-ve-Demografi-109
84. Utz, S. (2009). The (Potential) Benefits of Campaigning via Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01438.x
85. Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Digital political talk and political participation: Comparing established and third wave democracies. Sage Open, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440187849
86. Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874.
87. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s Complicated: Facebook Users’ Political Participation in the 2008 Election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0226
88. Wals, S. C. (2011). Does What Happens in Los Mochis Stay in Los Mochis? Explaining Postmigration Political Behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909358577
89. Yalley, A. A. (2021). Voter and Political Candidate’s Status Homophile: A Ghanaian Context. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1486770
90. Yanık, H. (2024). Sosyal medyanın Türk seçmeninin bilgilenme ve oy verme davranışındaki etkisi. Muhafazakâr Düşünce Dergisi, 20(65), 98–115.
91. Yao, Y., & Murphy, L. (2007). Remote electronic voting systems: an exploration of voters’ perceptions and intention to use. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.EJIS.3000672
92. Yasseri, T., Margetts, H., John, P., & Hale, S. (2016). Political turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton University Press.
93. Yıldırım, S. (2024). Z kuşağının siyasal tutumlarında sosyal medya, aile ve siyasal iletişim stratejilerinin rolü. İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 44–61.
94. Yüksek Seçim Kurulu. (2024). Seçim İstatistikleri. https://ysk.gov.tr/tr/secim-i%CC%87statistikleri/78318
95. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Cheni Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561