Politik Ekonomiye Schumpeterci Bir Bakış: Kapitalizm ve Siyasi Elitler

Year 2021, , 263 - 276, 23.03.2021

Hüsnü Bilir , Mehmet Şahin

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.739034

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Schumpeter’in elit modelinin politik ekonomisini incelemektir. Elitlerin kapitalizm içindeki rolünü anlamaya çalışan Schumpeterci yaklaşımın demokrasi teorileri bağlamındaki incelenmesine yer verilecektir. Demokrasi teorileri anlatımı ile başlayan çalışmada daha sonra sırasıyla Schumpeter’in ekonomik ve siyasi analizlerine yer verilecektir. Daha sonra bunlar arasında bağlantı kurularak günümüz politik ekonomi literatürünü nasıl etkilediğinden bahsedilecektir. Çalışmada gösterilmek istenen ana fikir, günümüzün Sorumluluk modeli ve Yetkilendirme modeline dayanan demokrasi anlayışının temelinin Schumpeterci gelenekten geldiğidir. Dolayısıyla bu modeller salt siyaset teorilerinden ziyade ekonomik modellerin yardımıyla açıklanmalıdır.

Keywords

Schumpeter, Elit Teorileri, Kapitalizm ve Sosyalizm

References

• Best H (2010) Associated Rivals: Antagonism And Cooperation In The German Political Elite. In: Best H and Higley J (eds) Democratic elitism: New theoretical and comparative perspectives. Leiden [u.a.], Birmingham, AL, USA: Brill; EBSCO Industries, Inc, pp. 97–116.
• Best H and Higley J (2010) Introduction: Democratic Elitism Reappraised. In: Best H and Higley J (eds) Democratic elitism: New theoretical and comparative perspectives. Leiden [u.a.], Birmingham, AL, USA: Brill; EBSCO Industries, Inc, pp. 1–22.
• Cunningham F (2001) Democratic Theory. In: Smelser NJe and Baltes PBe (eds) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences: Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, pp. 90–96.
• Cunningham F (2002) Theories of democracy: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
• Downs A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
• Elliott JE (1994) Joseph A. Schumpeter and The Theory of Democracy. Review of Social Economy 52(4): 280–300.
• Engelstad F (2010) Democratic Elitism-Conflict and Consensus. In: Best H and Higley J (eds) Democratic elitism: New theoretical and comparative perspectives. Leiden [u.a.], Birmingham, AL, USA: Brill; EBSCO Industries, Inc, pp. 61–78.
• Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Güler Aydın D (2018) J. A. Schumpeter’in İktisat Sosyolojisi: Emperyalizmler, Toplumsal Sınıflar ve Kurumsal Dönüşüm. In: Eren AA and Kırmızıaltın E (eds) İktisat Sosyolojisi: Kurucu Düşünürler ve İktisat Okulları Özelinde Bir Çalışma. Ankara: Heretik Yayıncılık, pp. 303–324.
• Haan J de and Sturm J-E (2003) Does more democracy lead to greater economic freedom? New evidence for developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy 19(3): 547–563.
• Higley J and Burton MG (2006) Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Lanham, Md., Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
• Hoselitz B (1951) Introduction to Imperialism and the Social Classes. New York: Agustus M. Kelley Publications.
• Körösényi A (2010) Beyond the Happy Consensus about Democratic Elitism. In: Best H and Higley J (eds) Democratic elitism: New theoretical and comparative perspectives. Leiden [u.a.], Birmingham, AL, USA: Brill; EBSCO Industries, Inc, pp. 43–60.
• Kurz HD (2017) İktisadi Düşünce Tarihi. Ankara: Heretik Yayıncılık.
• Mackie G (2009) Schumpeter's Leadership Democracy. Political Theory 37(1): 128–153.
• Manin B, Przeworski A and Stokes SC (1999) Elections and Representations. In: Przeworski A, Manin B and Stokes SC (eds) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–54.
• Medearis J (1997) Schumpeter, the New Deal, and Democracy. The American Political Science Review 91(4): 819–832.
• Medearis J (2001) Joseph Schumpeter's two theories of democracy. Cambridge, Mass., London: Harvard University Press.
• Medearis J (2009) Joseph A. Schumpeter. New York: Continuum.
• Ober J (2018) Joseph Schumpeter's Caesarist Democracy. Critical Review 29(4): 473–491.
• Piano N (2018) “Schumpeterianism” Revised: The Critique of Elites in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Critical Review 29(4): 505–529.
• Przeworski A, Manin B and Stokes SC (eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rode M and Gwartney JD (2012) Does democratization facilitate economic liberalization? European Journal of Political Economy 28(4): 607–619.
• Rousseau J-J (2002) The social contract: And, The first and second discourses / Jean-Jacques Rousseau ; edited and with an introduction by Susan Dunn ; with essays by Gita May … [et al.]. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
• Schumpeter JA (1928) The Instability of Capitalism. The Economic Journal 38(151): 361–386.
• Schumpeter JA (1931) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Schumpeter JA (1951) Imperialism And The Social Classes. Agustus M. Kelley Publications.
• Schumpeter JA (1991) The Crisis of the Tax State. In: Schumpeter JA and Swedberg R (eds) The economics and sociology of capitalism: Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 99–140.
• Schumpeter JA (2014) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London, New York (N. Y.): Routledge.
• Walker JL (1966) A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy. American Political Science Review 60(2): 285–295.