FOOD AND MOOD IN THE PARTICULAR SADNESS OF LEMON CAKE

Year 2021, Issue: 44, 145 - 158, 23.05.2021

Meryem Ayan , Fatma Yalvaç

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.758470

Abstract

The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake (2010) written by Aimee Bender presents the relation between foods and female moods. Aimee Bender implemented a mixture of real and imagery in her magic realist novel in which the female protagonist, Rose Edelstein, experiences some important changes in her life starting from her ninth birthday. These changes are closely related to food and affect Rose physiologically, psychologically, and emotionally. Rose loves lemon cake and her mother who starts spending most of her time in the kitchen cooks this cake for her ninth birthday. However, Rose feels hollowness aftertaste and feels that her mother is unhappy because she realizes that she can sense the feelings of people from the foods she consumes. Thus, this study aims to reveal the relationship between foods and feelings by analysing Aimee Bender's novel from a postmodern feminist perspective focusing on foods, feelings, gender roles, and female identity.

Keywords

Postmodern feminism, Food, Mood, Female, Identity

THE PARTICULAR SADNESS OF LEMON CAKE ROMANINDA YEMEK VE DUYGU DURUMU

Abstract

Aimee Bender tarafından yazılan The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake (2010) isimli roman yiyecekler ve kadınların duyguları arasındaki ilişkiyi göstermektedir. Aimee Bender kadın başkahraman Rose Edelstein’ın dokuzuncu yaş gününden itibaren hayatında bazı önemli değişiklikler yaşamaya başladığı büyülü gerçekçi romanında gerçek ve hayali birbiri ile harmanlamıştır. Bu değişiklikler yiyecekler ile yakından ilişkilidir ve Rose’u fizyolojik, psikolojik ve duygusal olarak etkilemektedir. Rose limonlu keki çok sevmektedir ve zamanının büyük bir kısmını mutfakta geçirmeye başlayan annesi onun için dokuzuncu yaş gününde bu keki yapar. Ancak, Rose’un ağzında kalan tat bir boşluk hissidir ve annesinin mutsuz olduğunu hissetmiştir çünkü artık o tükettiği yiyeceklerden kişilerin duygularını hissedebilmektedir. Buradan hareketle bu çalışma yiyecekler ve duygular arasındaki ilişkiyi Aimee Bender’ın romanını yemekler, duygular, cinsiyet rolleri ve kadın kimliğine odaklanan postmodern feminist bir bakış açısı ile inceleyerek ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

Postmodern feminism, Yemek, Duygu durumu, Kadın, Kimlik

References

• Almerico, G. M. (2014). “Food and Identity: Food Studies, Cultural, and Personal Identity”, Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 1-8.
• Arva, E. L. (2008). “Writing the Vanishing Real: Hyperreality and Magical Realism”. Journal of Narrative Theory, 38/1, 60-85.
• Avakian, A. V. and Haber, B. (2005). “Feminist Food Studies: A Brief History”, From Betty Crocker to Feminist Food Studies: Critical Perspectives on Women and Food, (Ed: A. V. Avakian and B. Haber), University of Massachusetts Press, United States of America.
• Ayan, M. (2012). Diversities in Ethnic Female Narratology. İkinci Adam Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Barthes, R. (2013). “Toward a Psychosociology of Contemporary Food Consumption”, Food and Culture, (Ed: C. Counihan and P. Van Esterik), Routledge, New York and London.
• Bender, A. (2010). The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake, Anchor Books, New York.
• Blodgett, H. (2004). “Mimesis and Metaphor: Food Imagery in International Twentieth-Century Women's Writing”, Papers on Language and Literature, 40/3, 260-295.
• Bortolussi, M. (2003). “Introduction: Why We Need Another Study of Magic Realism”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée, 30/2, 279-293.
• Boyce, C. and Fitzpatrick, J. (2017). A History of Food in Literature: From the Fourteenth Century to the Present, Routledge, London and New York.
• Cixous, H. (1976). “The Laugh of the Medusa”. Signs, 1/4, 875-893.
• De La Campa, R. (1999). “Magical Realism and World Literature: A Genre for the Times?”, Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos, 23/2, 205-219.
• Ebert, T. L. (1991). “The "Difference" of Postmodern Feminism”, College English, 53/8, 886-904.
• Fawcett, B. and Featherstone, B. (2000). “Setting the Scene: An Appraisal of Notions of Postmodernism, Postmodernity, and Postmodern Feminism”, Practice and Research in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspectives, (Ed: B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook and A. Rossiter), Routledge: London and New York.
• Fraser, N. and Nicholson, L. (1988). “Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism”. Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism, (Ed: A. Ross), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
• Henitiuk, V. (2003). “Step into My Parlour: Magical Realism and the Creation of a Feminist Space”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée, 30/2, 410-427.
• Long, L. M. (2004). “Learning to Listen to the Food Voice: Recipes as Expressions of Identity and Carriers of Memory”, Food, Culture & Society, 7/1, 118-122.
• Rich, A. (1972). “When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision”, College English, 34/1, 18-30.
• Sands, R. G. and Nuccio, K. (1992). “Postmodern Feminist Theory and Social Work”, Social Work, 37/6, 489-494.
• Shahani, G. G. (2018). “Introduction: Writing on Food and Literature”, Food and literature, (Ed: G. G. Shahani), Cambridge University Press, United States of America.
• Showalter, E. (1984). “Women's Time, Women's Space: Writing the History of Feminist Criticism”, Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature, 3(1/2), 29-43.
• Showalter, E. (1993). “American Gynocriticism”, American Literary History, 5/1, 111-128.
• Trivedi, K. (2013). “Magic Realism: A Genre of Fantasy and Fiction”, International Journal of English and Education, 2/3, 389-393.
• Varghese, A. (2018). “Food as Image in Literary Criticism”, International Journal of English Language, Literature in Humanities, 6/9, 428-436.
• Vidal, M. C. Á. (1991). “Towards a Postmodern Feminism?”, Atlantis, 12/2, 83-93.
• Yadav, M. S. and Yadav, M. K. (2018). “Aspects of Feminist Writing: A Presentation of Common Issues”, Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 3/1, 57-68.