Mutlak Gelir ve Yaşam Memnuniyeti: Nispi Gelir ve Sosyal Referans Gelir Etkisinin Aracılık Rolü

Abstract

Yaşam memnuniyetinin en önemli belirleyicilerinden biri mutlak gelirdir. Gelirin yaşam memnuniyeti üzerindeki etkisi alanda en çok tartışılan konulardan biridir. Yaşam memnuniyetinin belirleyicileri üzerinde yapılan çalışmalarda göçmenler sahip oldukları farklı dinamikler nedeniyle özel bir konuma sahiptir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yaşayan göçmenlerin mutlak gelirleri ile yaşam memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişkide nispi gelir ve sosyal referans gelir etkisinin rolü Hayes aracılık analizi ile test edilmiştir. Çalışmada yedi farklı yaşam alanı referans gurubu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya toplamda 1505 kişi katılmış ve bu katılımcıların 717’si kadın 788’i erkektir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre mutlak gelir ile yaşam memnuniyeti arasında anlamlı fakat negatif yönlü bir ilişki mevcuttur. Nispi gelir ve sosyal referans gelir etkisi ile yaşam memnuniyeti arasında ise anlamlı, pozitif yönlü ve oldukça kuvvetli bir ilişki mevcuttur. Çalışmada nispi gelir ve sosyal referans gelir etkisinin mutlak gelir ve yaşam memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Aracı değişkenlerin analize dahil edilmesi ile mutlak gelir ile yaşam memnuniyeti arasındaki negatif yönlü ilişkinin gücünün azaldığı görülmektedir.

Keywords

• Yaşam Memnuniyeti
• Mutlak Gelir
• Nispi Gelir
• Sosyal Referans Gelir
• Göçmenler

Absolute Income and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Relative Income and Social Reference Income Effect

Abstract

One of the most important determinants of life satisfaction is absolute income. The impact of income on life satisfaction is one of the most debated topics in the field. In studies examining the determinants of life satisfaction, immigrants hold a special position due to their unique dynamics. This study aims to test the role of relative income and social reference income effects in the relationship between absolute income and life satisfaction among immigrants living in Turkey using Hayes' mediation analysis. Seven different domains of life were used as reference groups in the study. A total of 1505 individuals participated in the research, consisting of 717 females and 788 males. The results indicate a significant but negative relationship between absolute income and life satisfaction. There is a significant, positive, and strong relationship between relative income, social reference income effects, and life satisfaction. The study finds that relative income and social reference income effects partially mediate the relationship between absolute income and life satisfaction. Including the mediating variables in the analysis reveals a decrease in the strength of the negative relationship between absolute income and life satisfactio

Keywords

• Life Satisfaction
• Absolute Income
• Relative Income
• Social Reference Income
• Immigrants

References

1. Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D. ve Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574-601. doi:10.1037/a0038781
2. Bak-Klimek, A., Karatzias, T., Elliott, L. ve MacLean, R. (2018). The Determinants of Well-Being Among Polish Economic Immigrants. Testing the Sustainable Happiness Model in Migrant Population. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1565-1588. doi:10.1007/s10902-017-9877-7
3. Bartram, D. (2011). Economic Migration and Happiness: Comparing Immigrants’ and Natives’ Happiness Gains From Income. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 57-76.
4. Bartram, D. (2015). Inverting the Logic of Economic Migration: Happiness Among Migrants Moving from Wealthier to Poorer Countries in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(5), 1211-1230. doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9554-z
5. Caporale, G. M., Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N. ve Yin, Y. P. (2009). Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(1), 42-51. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.06.004
6. Cheng, C., Cheung, M. W.-L., Montasem, A. ve Studies, 44 members of the International Network of Well-Being. (2016). Explaining Differences in Subjective Well-Being Across 33 Nations Using Multilevel Models: Universal Personality, Cultural Relativity, and National Income. Journal of Personality, 84(1), 46-58. doi:10.1111/jopy.12136
7. Cheung, F. ve Lucas, R. E. (2016). Income Inequality Is Associated with Stronger Social Comparison Effects: The Effect of Relative Income on Life Satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 110(2), 332-341. doi:10.1037/pspp0000059
8. Clark, A. E. (2016). Adaptation and the Easterlin Paradox. T. Tachibanaki (Ed.), Advances in Happiness Research: A Comparative Perspective içinde , Creative Economy (ss. 75-94). Tokyo: Springer Japan. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55753-1_6

9. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151-157. doi:10.1007/s11482-006-9007-x
10. Diener, E., Inglehart, R. ve Tay, L. (2013). Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497-527. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y
11. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L. ve Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195-223. doi:10.1007/BF01079018
12. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. ve Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
13. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O. ve Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463-22468. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015962107
14. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 997-1019. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.003
15. Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
16. Frank, K., Hou, F. ve Schellenberg, G. (2016). Life Satisfaction Among Recent Immigrants in Canada: Comparisons to Source-Country and Host-Country Populations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1659-1680. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9664-2
17. Frey, B. S. ve Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-Being. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rm1k adresinden erişildi.
18. Georgellis, Y., Tsitsianis, N. ve Yin, Y. P. (2009). Personal Values as Mitigating Factors in the Link Between Income and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 91(3), 329-344. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9344-2
19. Guan, C., Qiu, Y. ve An, R. (2019). Relative Income and Life Satisfaction among Chinese Adults. Sustainability, 11(20), 5651. doi:10.3390/su11205651
20. Gül, S. (2019). Happiness Perception of Students: An Application. Perspectives on Applied Economics and Politics: Cases from Turkey içinde . Ijopec Publication.
21. Gül, S. (2020). Mutluluk ve Uluslararası Göç: Genel Bir Bakış. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 371-387. doi:10.17153/oguiibf.481191
22. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications.
23. Hendriks, M. (2015). The happiness of international migrants: A review of research findings. Migration Studies, 3(3), 343-369. doi:10.1093/migration/mnu053
24. Hopkins, E. (2008). Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: What actually is their relationship? The Journal of Economic Inequality, 6(4), 351-372. doi:10.1007/s10888-008-9081-4
25. Hurd, M. D., Rohwedder, S. ve Tassot, C. (2015). The Impact of Employment Transitions on Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from the Great Recession and Its Aftermath. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR1127.html adresinden erişildi.
26. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Fourth Edition. Guilford Publications.
27. Liang, Y. ve Shen, J. (2016). Subjective Well-being and Its Determinants in China: An Empirical Study Based on Survey Data. Research in Applied Economics, 8(3), 1-18. doi:10.5296/rae.v8i3.9806
28. Liao, T. F. (2021). Income Inequality, Social Comparison, and Happiness in the United States. Socius, 7, 2378023120985648. doi:10.1177/2378023120985648
29. Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963-1002. doi:10.1093/qje/120.3.963
30. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Subjective Well-Being and Economic Analysis, 45(3), 251-278. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00145-7
31. Medvedev, O. N. ve Landhuis, C. E. (2018). Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life. PeerJ, 6, e4903. doi:10.7717/peerj.4903
32. Monteiro, L. ve Haan, M. (2022). The Life Satisfaction of Immigrants in Canada: Does Time Since Arrival Matter more than Income? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 23(3), 1397-1420. doi:10.1007/s12134-021-00899-x Obućina, O. (2013). The Patterns of Satisfaction Among Immigrants in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1105-1127.
33. Oishi, S. ve Kesebir, S. (2015). Income Inequality Explains Why Economic Growth Does Not Always Translate to an Increase in Happiness. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1630-1638. doi:10.1177/0956797615596713
34. Oshio, T., Nozaki, K. ve Kobayashi, M. (2011). Relative Income and Happiness in Asia: Evidence from Nationwide Surveys in China, Japan, and Korea. Social Indicators Research, 104(3), 351-367. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9754-9
35. Shen, J. ve Kogan, I. (2020). Immigrants’ relative income and life satisfaction: Comparison groups from a multi-generational perspective. Acta Sociologica, 63(1), 82-102. doi:10.1177/0001699319859397
36. Stillman, S., Gibson, J., McKenzie, D. ve Rohorua, H. (2015). Miserable Migrants? Natural Experiment Evidence on International Migration and Objective and Subjective Well-Being. World Development, 65, 79-93. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.003
37. Tibesigwa, B., Visser, M. ve Hodkinson, B. (2016). Effects of Objective and Subjective Income Comparisons on Subjective Wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 361-389. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1035-1
38. Tsurumi, T., Imauji, A. ve Managi, S. (2019). Relative Income, Community Attachment and Subjective Well–Being: Evidence from Japan. Kyklos, 72(1), 152-182. doi:10.1111/kykl.12193
39. Wang, D., Schwanen, T. ve Mao, Z. (2019). Does exposure to richer and poorer neighborhoods influence wellbeing? Cities, 95, 102408. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102408
40. Yaman, F., Cubi-Molla, P. ve Plagnol, A. C. (2022). Why do immigrants become less happy? Explanations for the decrease in life satisfaction of immigrants in Germany over time. Migration Studies, 10(4), 670-702. doi:10.1093/migration/mnac034
41. Yu, H. (2019). The Impact of Self-Perceived Relative Income on Life Satisfaction: Evidence from British Panel Data. Southern Economic Journal, 86(2), 726-745. doi:10.1002/soej.12349
42. Yu, Z. ve Chen, L. (2016). Income and Well-Being: Relative Income and Absolute Income Weaken Negative Emotion, but Only Relative Income Improves Positive Emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02012 adresinden erişildi.
43. Zafar, S. ve Ammara, S. (2023). Pursuit of happiness: Subjective well-being of immigrants and natives. International Migration, 61(3), 314-335. doi:10.1111/imig.13062