Kalkınma Yazınında Farklılıklara Vurgu: Post Kalkınma Yaklaşım(lar)ı

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 94 - 123, 25.06.2020

Mesut Kaçanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.732011

Cited By: 1

Öz

İkinci dünya savaşı sonrası ortaya çıkan kalkınma iktisadı 1980’lere kadar altın çağını yaşamış olmasına rağmen 1980 sonrası dönemde kalkınma adına uygulanan politikaların başarılı olamaması nedeniyle önemli eleştirilere maruz kalmıştır. Bu dönemde kalkınma iktisadının çıkmaza girdiği ileri sürülmüştür. Farklı görüşler kalkınma iktisadının çıkmazına çözüm üretmeye çalışmıştır. Bu farklı görüşler arasında yer alan post kalkınma yaklaşımları kalkınma iktisadının çıkmazını post modern bakış açısıyla eleştirmekte ve çözüm sunmaya çalışmaktadır. Post kalkınma yaklaşımları modernist kalkınma düşüncesine önemli eleştiriler getirmiş, kültürel farklılıklara vurgu yaparak evrensel meta-anlatıların diğer görüşleri baskı altına almasını eleştirmiştir. Bu çalışmada post modern görüşler üzerine şekillenen post kalkınma yaklaşımlarının, kalkınma yazınına yönelttikleri temel eleştirilere ve kalkınma çözümüne yer verilecektir. Post kalkınma yaklaşımları genel hatlarıyla ele alınacak ve kalkınma sorunsalına bakışı değerlendirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Post kalkınma yaklaşım(lar)ı, Post modernite, Kalkınma projesi, Kalkınmaya alternatifler, Kültürel farklılıklar

Kaynakça

• Ahorro, J. (2008). The Waves of Post-Development Theory and a Consideration of the Philippines. Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference. University of British Columbia: Vancouver, BC.
• Altun, F. (2000). “Modernleşme Kuramı ve Gelişme Sorunu”. Divan, 1, 123-186.
• Andreasson, S. (2007, December). Thinking Beyond Development: The Future of Post-Development Theory in Southern Africa. Draft Paper, Prepared for the British International Studies Association annual conference, University of Cambridge.
• Andrews N. ve Bawa S. (2014).“A Post development Hoax? (Re)-examining the Past, Present and Future of Development Studies”, Third World Quarterly, 35(6), 922-938.
• Berg, E. (2007). “Post-Development Theory in Africa”. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 19(4), 541-554.
• Berthoud, G. (2010). “Market”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 74-94.
• Brigg, M. (2002). “Post-development, Foucault And The Colonisation Metaphor”. Third World Quarterly, 23(3), 421-436.
• Cleaver, Harry, (2010): “Socialism”. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 260-278.
• Connely, M., Patricia, L., Tania M., Mac D. M., Parpart, J. L. (2000). “Feminism and Development: Theoretical Perspectives”. In J. L. Parpart, M. P. Connely, V. E. Barriteau (Eds), Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development. Ottawa: IDRC Books, pp. 51-160.
• Cowen, M. ve Shenton R. (1995). “The İnvention of Development”. In J. Crush (Ed.), Power of Development. Routledge, pp. 25-41.
• Crush, J. (1995). “Introduction: Imagining Development”. In J. Crush (Ed.) Power of Development. Routledge, pp. 1-21.
• Dada, S. O. (2016). “Post-Development and the role of tradition in the process of development”. Trames, 20(1), 75–93.
• Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Easterly, W. (2007). “The Ideology of Development”. Foreign Policy, July/August, 31-35.
• Ercan, F. ve Biçer, Ö. (2005). “İktisat ve Kalkınma Ekonomisi: Kalkınma İdeolojisinin Sosyalizasyonu Olarak Kalkınma Ders Kitaplarının Eleştirisi”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 16(57), 51-102.
• Escobar, A. (1992a). “Imagining a Post-Development Era? Critical Thought Development and Social Movements”. Social Text, 31/32 (16), 243, 20–56.
• Escobar, A. (1992b). "Reflections on Development: Grassroots Approaches and Alternative Politics in the Third World.", Futures, 24(5), 411-436.
• Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Escobar, A. (2000). “Beyond the Search for a Paradigm? Post-development and Beyond”. Development, 43(4), 11-14.
• Escobar, A. (2007). “‘Post-Development’ as Concept and Social Practice.”. In A. Ziai, (Ed.) Exploring Post- Development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 18-33.
• Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference. Londra: Duke University Press.
• Escobar, A. (2010). “Planning”. W. Sachs (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 145-160.
• Esteva, G. (2010). “Development”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 1-23.
• Esteva, G. ve Prakash, M. S. (1998). “Beyond Development, What?”. Development in Practice, 8(3), 280-296.
• Grisschhow J. ve McKnight, G. H. (2003). “Rhyming Development Practising Post-development in Colonial Ghana and Uganda”, Journal of Historical Sociology, 16(4), December 2003, 517-549.
• Güçlü, A., Uzun E., Uzun, S., Yolsal Ü. H. (2008). Felsefe Sözlüğü. Ankara: Bilim Sanat Yayınları.
• Hall, S. (1995). “The West and The Rest: Discourse and Power”, In S. Hall and K. Thompson, (Eds), Modernity: an İntroduction to Modern Societies. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press, pp. 184-228.
• Heywood, A. (2017). Siyaset Teorisine Giriş, (Çev. Hızır Murat Köse). Küre Yayınları,
• Islam, Md. S. (2009). “Paradigms of Development and Their Power Dynamics: A Review”. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 24-37.
• İnternet: Truman, H. S. (1949). “Inaugural Speech”. Web: http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres53.html 31 Aralık 2015’de alınmıştır.
• Keyder, Ç. (1979). Emperyalizm, Az Gelişmişlik ve Türkiye. Birikim Yayınları.
• Kippler, C. (2010). “Exploring Post Development: Politics, the State and Emancipation. The question of alternatives”. POLIS Journal, (3), 1-38.
• Latouche, S. (2010). “Standard of Living”, In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 279-294.
• Lieten, G. K. (2002). “Faltering development and the Post-Modernist Discourse”. Social Scientist, 30(7/8), 67-83.
• Lummis, C. D. (2010). “Equality”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 38-54.
• Matthews, S. (2004). “Post-Development Theory And The Question Of Alternatives: A View From Africa”. Third World Quarterly, 25(2), 373–384.
• McKinnon, K. (2008). “Taking post development theory to the field: Issues in development research, Northern Thailand”. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49(3), 281–293.
• Mcregor, A. (2007). “Development, Foreign Aid and Post-development in Timor-Leste”, Third World Quarterly, 28(1), 155-170.
• Naz, F. (2006). “Review Article Arturo Escobar And The Development Discourse: An Overview”. Asian Affairs, 28(3), 64-84,
• Nustad, K. D. (2001). “Development: The Devil We Know?”. Third World Quarterly, 22(4), 479-489.
• Parpart, J. L. (1993). “Who is the ‘Other’?: A Postmodern Feminist Critique of Women and Development Theory and Practice”. Development and Change, (24), 439-464.
• Parpart, J. L. (1995). “Deconstruction the Development “Expert” Gender, Development and the “vulnerable groups”. In M. H. Marchand and J. Parpart (Eds), Feminism/Postmodernism/Development. London: Routledge, pp. 221-243.
• Pieterse, J. N. (2000). “After Post-Development”. Third World Quarterly, 21(2), 175-191.
• Pieterse, J. N. (2010). Development Theory: Deconstructions Reconstructions. Sage Publications.
• Rahnema, M. (1997). “Towards Post-Development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language and New Paradigms”. In M. Rahnema and V. Bawtree (Eds.), The Post-Development Reader. London and New Jersey: Zed Books, pp. 377-403.
• Rahnema, M. (2010). “Poverty”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 174-194.
• Rahnema, M. ve Bawtree, V. (Eds). (1997). The Post-Development Reader. Zed Books.
• Rapley, J. (2004). “Development Studies and the Post-Development Critique”. Progress in Development Studies, 4(4), 350-354.
• Rist, G. (2008). The History of Development. From Western Origins to Global Faith. London: Zed Books.
• Sachs, W. (Ed.). (1992a). The Development Dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power. (second edition). London: Zed Books.
• Sachs, W. (1992b). “Introduction”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 1-5.
• Sachs, W. (2010a). “Environment”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books, pp. 24-37.
• Sachs, W. (2010b). “One World”. In W. Sachs. (Ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London, Zed Books, pp. 111-126.
• Schuurman, F. J. (2000). “Paradigms Lost, Paradigms Regained? Development Studies in the Twenty-first Century”. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 7-20.
• Siemiatycki, E. (2005). “Post-Development at a Crossroads: Towards a ‘Real’ Development”, Undercurrent, 2(3), 56-60.
• Simon, D. (1997). “Development Reconsidered: New Directions in Development Thinking”, Human Geography, 79(4), 183-201.
• Storey, A. (2000). “Post-Development Theory: Romanticism and Pontius Pilate Politics”. Development Thematic Section, 43(4), 40–46.
• Watts, M. (1995). “ ‘A New Deal In Emotions’ Theory and Practice and The Crisis of Development”. In J. Crush (Ed.), Power of Development. Routledge, pp. 43-59.
• Ziai, A. (2004). “The Ambivalence of Post-development: Between Reactionary Positivism and Radical Democracy”. Third World Quarterly, 25(6), 1045-1060.
• Ziai, A. (2007). “Development Discourse and Its Critics: An Introduction to Post-Development”, In A. Ziai, (Ed.) Exploring Post- Development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–17.
• Ziai, A. (2013). “The Discourse of “Development” and Why The Concept Should be Abandoned”, Development in Practice, 23(1), 123-136.
• Ziai, A. (2015). “Debate Post-Development: Premature Burials and Haunting Ghosts”. Development and Change, 46(4), 833–854.