Bibliometric Profile of an Emerging Journal: Participatory Educational Research
Abstract
“Participatory Educational Research (PER)” journal is one of the journals that contributes to the field of education and indexed in major international databases such as ERIC and Scopus. This study provides the bibliometric characteristic of the total 347 articles published in PER during the period of 2014-2021 using bibliometric analysis. Publish or Perish software to collect citation data from Google Scholar was used as an analysis instrument for the impact of the articles. It was found that short-titled articles received more citations than long-titled articles (over 2 times greater), but not statistically significant (p>0.05). On the other hand, correlation between citation and download numbers was found to be a statistically significant positive (rS=0.289 and rP=0.524; p<0.01). In the analysis of keywords and titles, it was observed that the prominent words overlapped with each other and with the purpose of journal as well. The most cited articles and the institutions contributing to national and international levels were analyzed too. It was concluded that 83.72% of the authors were in Turkey, there was no “institutional localization” among the institutions contributing at the national level and that they had achieved significant success in terms of national recognition. PER has gained significant momentum in academic standards and visibility since it first joined the umbrella organization DergiPark in 2019. It should be noted that amongst the most important points toward being open to development in the point of international recognition is the existence of contributions from Anglo-Saxon and Continental European countries, which have appeared as limited. According to the findings, it is discussed what can be done from this point onward based on basic publishing standards, publication content, national/international visibility, and citation analyses. The results can guide authors during the writing phase of studies and the editors and referees during the selection and evaluation phases.
Keywords
Bibliometric, Citation Analysis, Participatory Education Research (PER), Dergipark, Paper Usage Data
Supporting Institution
This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- Abramo, G. (2018). Revisiting the scientometrics conceptualization of impact and its measurement, Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 590-597.
- Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). References made and citations received by scientific articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 40-49.
- Allik, J., Lauk, K., & Realo, A. (2020). Factors predicting the scientific wealth of nations, Cross-Cultural Research, 54(4), 364-397.
- Aman, V., & Botte, A. (2017). A bibliometric view on the internationalization of European educational research. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 843-868.
- Andersen, H. (2000). Influence and reputation in the social sciences-how much do researchers agree?. Journal of Documentation, 56, 674-692.
- Archambault, É., & Larivière, V. (2010). The limits of bibliometrics for the analysis of the social sciences and humanities literature. World Social Science Report, 251-254.
- Arslan, R., Orbay, K., & Orbay, M. (2022). The tracking of paper usage data versus citation counts for Library Philosophy and Practice, Library Philosophy and Practice, (under review: MS-13511).
- Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A, Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363-376.
- Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: a large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 164-175.
- Budd, J. M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: Citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 294-304.
