Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations

Volume: 10 Number: 1 January 30, 2023
EN

Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations

Abstract

This study investigates the trends of doctoral dissertations produced in Türkiye in the field of Educational Technologies. 292 doctoral dissertations were included in this study which was conducted in the design of document analysis in the period between 2011 and 2020. The dissertations were put to content analysis by using the Dissertation Analysis Form developed within the scope of this study. The results demonstrated that the approach of the mixed method research was more commonly used in the dissertations. As a research model, it has been determined that case study from qualitative approaches and quasi-experimental model from quantitative approaches are mostly preferred. It is seen that the students of the faculty of education are greatly used as the sample. It is concluded that descriptive statistical methods are mostly used during the data analysis phase and the SPSS program is the most frequently preferred data analysis program. It has been determined that simple level statistical analysis techniques are used in theses. It is clear that although effect size calculations were made, there were also studies in which the type was not specified. Of the statistical techniques used for validity and reliability, Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient was found to be frequently used. 1376 keywords emerged in the analysed theses. These keywords were presented visually using a force-directed algorithm. Stating sampling methods clearly in studies will guide the studies to be conducted in the future. The sampling of different types of students is important in that it enriches the potential areas of study paving the way for the emergence of different perspectives.

Keywords

educational technologies, statistical trends, methodological trends, keyword analysis

References

  1. Abdelghani, B. (2020). Trends in MOOCs Research: Analysis of Educational Technology Journals. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(17), 47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i17.14637
  2. Alkraiji, A., & Eidaroos, A. (2016). Trends and Issues in Educational Technology Research in Saudi Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(36), 62-79.
  3. Anderson, T., Saunders, G., & Alexander, I. (2021). Alternative dissertation formats in education-based doctorates. Higher Education Research & Development, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1867513
  4. Alper, A., & Gülbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of recent research in TOJET. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 124-135.
  5. Altinpulluk, H. (2019). Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1089–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9806-3
  6. Asdaque, M. M., & Rizvi, S. A. A. (2019). Exploring the Research Trends-Related Imbalances in Doctoral Level Research on Distance Education in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 5(1), 105-122.
  7. Bangert, A. W., & Baumberger, J. P. (2005). Research and statistical techniques used in the Journal of Counseling & Development: 1990–2001. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(4), 480-487. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00369.x
  8. Baydas, O., Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., Aydemir, M., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Educational technology research trends from 2002 to 2014. Scientometrics, 105(1), 709-725. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11192-015-1693-4
  9. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  10. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
APA
Gündüz, A., Gündüzalp, C., Koçak, Ö., & Göktaş, Y. (2023). Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations. Participatory Educational Research, 10(1), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.8.10.1
AMA
1.Gündüz A, Gündüzalp C, Koçak Ö, Göktaş Y. Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations. PER. 2023;10(1):140-159. doi:10.17275/per.23.8.10.1
Chicago
Gündüz, Ali, Cengiz Gündüzalp, Ömer Koçak, and Yüksel Göktaş. 2023. “Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations”. Participatory Educational Research 10 (1): 140-59. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.8.10.1.
EndNote
Gündüz A, Gündüzalp C, Koçak Ö, Göktaş Y (January 1, 2023) Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations. Participatory Educational Research 10 1 140–159.
IEEE
[1]A. Gündüz, C. Gündüzalp, Ö. Koçak, and Y. Göktaş, “Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations”, PER, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 140–159, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.17275/per.23.8.10.1.
ISNAD
Gündüz, Ali - Gündüzalp, Cengiz - Koçak, Ömer - Göktaş, Yüksel. “Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations”. Participatory Educational Research 10/1 (January 1, 2023): 140-159. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.8.10.1.
JAMA
1.Gündüz A, Gündüzalp C, Koçak Ö, Göktaş Y. Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations. PER. 2023;10:140–159.
MLA
Gündüz, Ali, et al. “Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2023, pp. 140-59, doi:10.17275/per.23.8.10.1.
Vancouver
1.Ali Gündüz, Cengiz Gündüzalp, Ömer Koçak, Yüksel Göktaş. Educational Technology Research Trends: A 10-Year Content Analysis of PhD Dissertations. PER. 2023 Jan. 1;10(1):140-59. doi:10.17275/per.23.8.10.1