The Enhancement of Prospective Teachers’ Competence and Awareness in the Understanding by Design
Abstract
Keywords
Understanding by design, Backward design, prospective teachers, Enhance competence and awareness.
Supporting Institution
References
- Bowen, R. S. (2017). Understanding by Design. Vanderbilt University, Center for Teaching. Retrieved [todaysdate] from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/understanding-by-design/.
- Boozer, A. (2014). Planning backwards to go forward: Examining pre-service teachers’ use of backward design to plan and deliver instruction. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Arizona State University, Arizona.
- Bruner, J. S. (2021). The process of education. (Translate. Emir Rüzgar).Pegem Akademi Publication.
- Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B. & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis. (Translate. Ed. Ahmet Aypay). Anı Publication.
- Covey, S. R. (2002). The 7 habits of highly effective people. (Translate.Osman Deniztekin ve Filiz Nayır Deniztekin). Varlık Publication.
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
- Ellis, K. (2015). Exemplars of curriculum theory. (Translate. Ed. Asım Arı). Eğitim Publication.
- Gürbüz, Ö., Koçak, F. K. & Yurtseven, N. (2022). The investigatıon of the effect of UbD based developmental design on students’ mathematics achievement. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.791938
- Graff, N. (2011). An effective and agonizing way to learn: backwards design and new teachers preparation for planning curriculum. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 151-168.
- Jonsson, A. & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational research review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
