Determination of Teacher Qualifications from the Perspective of Stakeholders: Rubric Development Study
Abstract
The aim of this study is to develop a rubric to determine the qualifications of teachers, one of the most important elements of education. There are many measurement tools in the literature. One of the alternative and authentic assessment tools is rubrics, also known as rubrics. Rubrics have been defined in many studies in the literature. In the study, the rubric development stages suggested by Goodrich Andrade were taken into account. The rubric was created after the reliability studies of the rubric form were completed. In the research, an analytical rubric with 37 items was developed to be used in determining ‘the qualified teacher.’ The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the developed measurement tool was found to be .96. Based on the results obtained from the research, it can be stated that the developed rubric is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used in the qualitative evaluation of teachers teaching all levels. The findings showed that the rubric had high agreement and reliability values among different stakeholder groups. Therefore, it can be said that this study provides a basis for Türkiye in determining teacher qualifications for science education, especially in the field of education. The developed rubric serves as a valid and reliable measurement tool, contributing to the objective assessment of teacher performance across all levels of the education process.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
Project Number
218K513
Ethical Statement
This study was conducted by paying attention to ethical principles. No potential competing interest was reported by the authors.
There isn’t any conflict of interest between corresponding author and the co-authors.
Thanks
We extend our heartfelt thanks to TÜBİTAK for their valuable support for our project.
References
- Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enchancing the quality of tacher decision making. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Asscociaties, Publishers.
- Atar, H. Y. (2014). Multilevel effects of teacher characteristics on TIMSS 2011 science achievement, education and science. Large-Scale Assessment, Special Issue 39(172), 121-137.
- Bağçeci, B., Başaran, M., Şahin, A., & Doğan, E. (2020). Constructivist teacher performance evaluation scale in the teaching-learning process: A rubric study. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, 2(1), 232-256.
- Bal İncebacak, B., & Ersoy, E. (2022). Development of a Mathematical Language Scale in Fraction Teaching (MLSFT). Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.29.9.2
- Booth, D., & Coles, R. (2017). What is a "good" teacher? Pembroke Publishers Limited.
- Bozbayındır, F. (2019). Examining the factors affecting the status of the teaching profession on the basis of teacher views, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 18(72), 2076-2104.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, 359-715.
- Buaraphan, K. (2012). Multiple Perspectives on desirable characteristics of science teachers for educational reform. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 384-393.
- Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103-115.
- Çalışkan, M., Işık, A. N., & Saygın, Y. (2013). Prospective teachers' perception of ideal teacher, Elementary Education Online, 12(2), 575-584.
