Research Article

Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction

Volume: 11 Number: H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue December 31, 2024
EN

Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction

Abstract

The aim of this study is to find out teachers' views on digital distraction. The sub-objectives of the study are to find out whether teachers experience digital distraction, in which environments they experience digital distraction, what they feel when they experience digital distraction and what precautions they take against digital distraction. The participants of the research, which was designated adopting with a phenomenological design, were a total of 81 teachers. As a result of content analysis, the reasons for encountering digital distraction were listed as advertising, latest news, alerts, the large amount of content on the Internet, being asked to look at a social media account, look at other studies when doing research, and other videos suggestions while watching a video interest/curiosity and boredom. The environments in which teachers experience digital distraction are social media, conducting research, social environment, shopping websites, work life and leisure time. The reasons for experiencing digital distraction in these environments include interest/curiosity, advertisements, notifications, boredom, news and the huge amount of content on the internet. Teachers experience negative emotions such as anger, sadness, and regret when they experience digital distraction. Teachers reported feeling happy because they were learning new information, they felt relaxed because they were moving away from the subject and resting, and happy because they were looking at things they were curious about. The precautions taken by teachers are self-control, turning off notifications, limiting the time spent digitally, taking the phone/computer away, not opening/closing too many tabs and installing ad/cookie blocker software.

Keywords

Digital distraction, teachers, view

References

  1. Aaron, L. S., & Lipton, T. (2018). Digital distraction: Shedding light on the 21st-century college classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(3), 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517736876
  2. Agarwal, M., Bishesh, B., Bansal, S., & Kumari, D. (2021). Role of social media on digital distraction: A study on university students. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 13(7), 125-136.
  3. Agrawal, P., Sahana, H. S., & De', R. (2017). Digital distraction. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
  4. Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C.A., (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084.
  5. Bowman, L.L., Levine, L.E., Waite, B.M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54(4), 927-931
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  7. Chen, L., Nath, R., & Tang, Z. (2020). Understanding the determinants of digital distraction: An automatic thinking behavior perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106195.
  8. Chen, L., Nath, R., & Insley, R. (2014). Determinants of digital distraction: A cross-cultural investigation of users in Africa, China and the US. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 23(3), 8.
  9. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. Pearson: New York.
  10. Dietz, S., & Henrich, C. (2014). Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.045
APA
Güngör, E., & Kurt, A. A. (2024). Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction. Participatory Educational Research, 11(H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.92.11.6
AMA
1.Güngör E, Kurt AA. Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction. PER. 2024;11(H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue):21-33. doi:10.17275/per.24.92.11.6
Chicago
Güngör, Ece, and Adile Aşkım Kurt. 2024. “Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction”. Participatory Educational Research 11 (H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue): 21-33. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.92.11.6.
EndNote
Güngör E, Kurt AA (December 1, 2024) Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction. Participatory Educational Research 11 H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue 21–33.
IEEE
[1]E. Güngör and A. A. Kurt, “Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction”, PER, vol. 11, no. H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue, pp. 21–33, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.17275/per.24.92.11.6.
ISNAD
Güngör, Ece - Kurt, Adile Aşkım. “Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction”. Participatory Educational Research 11/H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue (December 1, 2024): 21-33. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.92.11.6.
JAMA
1.Güngör E, Kurt AA. Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction. PER. 2024;11:21–33.
MLA
Güngör, Ece, and Adile Aşkım Kurt. “Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 11, no. H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue, Dec. 2024, pp. 21-33, doi:10.17275/per.24.92.11.6.
Vancouver
1.Ece Güngör, Adile Aşkım Kurt. Teachers’ Views on Digital Distraction. PER. 2024 Dec. 1;11(H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue):21-33. doi:10.17275/per.24.92.11.6