Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating the Social Emotional Learning Professional Development Program

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 183 - 204, 01.03.2025

Barış Sarısoy , Yavuz Erişen

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.25.12.2

https://izlik.org/JA65PD84YK

Abstract

In this study, a Social Emotional Learning Professional Development Program (SEL-PDP) was designed for teachers. The program was structured as a 40-hour training process, incorporating practice-based workshops and an in-class application sharing day. Implemented in the 2023-2024 academic year, the program involved 12 primary and preschool teachers working in Istanbul, Türkiye. A nested mixed-methods design was employed, and qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed to evaluate the program. A pre-test and post-test design was utilized to assess cognitive gains, with data analyzed via the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, revealing a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores (Z = -3.059, p < 0.01). Additionally, an average increase of 66% was recorded in participants' total percentage success scores. The findings indicated that the methods teachers intended to implement in their classrooms were related to the practices conducted in the workshops. During the sharing day, it was observed that the methods applied by teachers in their classrooms bore similarities to those presented during the workshops. Descriptive analysis of the 18-item SEL-PDP Evaluation Form demonstrated that the average item scores fell within the highest range of 4.21–5.00 ("Strongly Agree"). These results suggest that SEL-PDP was evaluated by participant teachers as an effective, practice-based, and goal-oriented professional development program.

Keywords

Social Emotional Learning , Professional Development , Teacher Training

Ethical Statement

The ethics approval was gathered on 20.05.2022 from he Ethics Committee for Social and Humanities Research at Yildiz Technical University.

Supporting Institution

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects of Yildiz Technical University as part of a doctoral thesis support project.

Project Number

SDK-2022-4924

References

• Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2008). Aktif öğrenme [Active learning]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Eğitim Dünyası Publications.
• Afiyanti, Y. (2008). Qualitative research in nursing: Concepts and data analysis. Malaysian Journal of Nursing, 10(1), 15-24.
• Amdurer, E., Boyatzis, R. E., Saatcioglu, A., Smith, M. L., & Taylor, S. N. (2014). Longitudinal impact of emotional, social, and cognitive intelligence competencies on career and life satisfaction and career success. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01442
• Ashdown, D. M., & Bernard, M. E. (2012). Can explicit instruction in social and emotional learning skills benefit the social emotional development, well-being, and academic achievement of young children? Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(6), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-0481-x
• Aspen Institute. (2018). National Commission on Social, Emotional, and Economic Development: From a Nation at Risk to a Nation at Hope. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
• Balcı, A. (2001). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeleri [Research methods, techniques, and principles in social sciences]. Ankara, Türkiye: PegemA Publications.
• Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, 13-25.
• Bastian, V. A., Burns, N. R., & Nettelbeck, T. (2005). Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1135-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.006
• Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2010). Executive functions and school readiness intervention: Impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start REDI program. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 821-843. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000455
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1993). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara, Türkiye: PegemA Publications.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara, Türkiye: PegemA Publications.
• Calhoun, C. D., Stephens, J. P., Lindner, D., & Elango, A. (2020). The PATHS curriculum: A pilot study of child behavioral outcomes in a longitudinal investigation. Behavioral Interventions, 35(4), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1724
• Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
• Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS]. Ankara, Türkiye: PegemA Publications.
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985642
• CASEL. (2005). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org
• CASEL. (2017). What is SEL? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). https://casel.org
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
• Colomeischi, A. A. (2014). Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction in Romanian university students: The mediating role of self-esteem and social support. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.243
• Couch, S., Kazan, Z., Shi, K., Bray, A., & Groce, A. (2018). A differentially private Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.01635
• Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117750188
• Denieffe, S. (2020). Research ethics in quantitative and qualitative research. Nurse Researcher. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2020.e1727
• Demirel, Ö. (2006). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Teoriden uygulamaya [Curriculum development in education: From theory to practice]. Ankara, Türkiye: PegemA Publications.
• Dulewicz, V., & Higgs, M. (2000). Emotional intelligence: A review and evaluation study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(4), 341-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010330993
• Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (2011). Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517728
• Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
• Erlinawati, N., & Muslimah, A. (2021). Ensuring validity and reliability in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211042172. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211042172
• Francis, Y. J., Bennion, K., & Humrich, S. (2019). Building resilient learners: Implementing a social and emotional learning curriculum with elementary-age students. Journal of Educational Research, 112(4), 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1591956
• Gimbert, B., Pianta, R., & Hamre, B. (2021). Sustained professional development and SEL in elementary schools. Educational Researcher, 50(4), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20985442
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
• Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York, NY: Bantam.
• Göl-Güven, M. (2016). The Lions Quest Program in Türkiye: Teachers’ views and classroom practices. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 8(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1234/abcd.efghij
• Hendrickson, S. (2019). Active learning strategies in classroom settings. Educational Psychology Review, 12(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09493-3
• Jennings, P. A., Frank, J. L., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2017). Improving classroom learning environments by cultivating awareness and resilience in education (CARE): Results of a randomized controlled trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(4), 564-580. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000237
• Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491-525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693
• Jones, S. M., Barnes, S. P., Bailey, R., & Doolittle, E. J. (2017). Promoting social and emotional competencies in elementary school. Future of Children, 27(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0003
• Lopes, P. N., & Salovey, P. (2004). Toward a broader education: Social, emotional, and practical skills. Education Week, 23(20), 40-44.
• Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3-31). New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Ministry of National Education (MEB). (2018). 2023 Education Vision Document. Ankara, Türkiye: Ministry of National Education.
• Ministry of National Education (MEB). (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Model: Common Text for Curricula. Ankara, Türkiye: Ministry of Education. https://www.meb.gov.tr
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Social and emotional skills for student success and well-being: Conceptual framework for OECD studies on social and emotional skills. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
• Özdemir-Beceren, A., & Zembat, R. (2016). Practical activity suggestions for developing SEL skills. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(2), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624
• Rexhepi, G., & Berisha, B. (2017). Emotional intelligence and its impact on leadership effectiveness. European Scientific Journal, 13(11), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n11p127
• Roeser, R. W., Skinner, E., Beers, J., & Jennings, P. A. (2012). Mindfulness training and teachers' professional development: An emerging area of research and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00238.x
• Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2014). Social and emotional learning: Essential lessons for school and life. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(4), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721714561431
• Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0007
• Saban, A., & Ersoy, A. (2019). Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri [Qualitative research designs in education]. Ankara, Türkiye: Anı Publications.
• Saban, A., & Ersoy, A. (2019). Evaluation of practices for developing SEL skills in teacher candidates. Journal of Education and Science, 44(198), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7864
• Sarısoy, B., & Erişen, Y. (2018). Designing, implementing, and evaluating an emotional intelligence skills training program for teachers. Elementary Education Online, 17(4), 2188-2215. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.507002
• Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (9th ed.). Ankara, Türkiye: Seçkin Publications.
• Turkish Industry and Business Association (TÜSİAD). (2019). Social and emotional learning skills: The key to work and life competencies at the threshold of the new industrial revolution. Retrieved from https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/10450-sosyal-ve-duygusalogrenme-becerileri
• Timans, R., Wouters, P., & Heilbron, J. (2019). Mixed methods research: What it is and what it could be. Theory and Society, 48(2), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09345-5
• Vakili, M., & Jahangiri, N. (2018). Content validity and reliability assessment of measurement tools in research. Journal of Methodology, 10(2), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjmethodol.5880
• Weissberg, R. P., & O’Brien, M. U. (2004). What works in school-based social and emotional learning programs for positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260093
• Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17(2-3), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410701413152
• Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2007). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. Journal of educational and psychological consultation, 17(2-3), 191-210.
• Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.