Promoting Engagement for Inclusion in Action: An Autoethnographic Journey of a Researcher-Preschool Teacher Experience

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 19 - 37, 01.07.2025

Demet Aydın

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.47.12.4

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Supporting children's engagement is essential for creating inclusive educational environments in early childhood. During early childhood, inclusive learning environments should provide all children with opportunities to engage in the learning process actively. This study aims to explore practices that encourage children’s engagement in such environments, to identify challenges encountered during this process, and to examine solutions to these challenges. A qualitative research method, specifically an autoethnographic approach, was employed. The researcher assumed dual roles as both educator and researcher. Data were collected through reflective journals maintained by the teacher-researcher and were subsequently analysed and interpreted using content analysis. As a result of this study, it was concluded that the environmental differentiation made to support children's engagement, along with the differentiation of the learning environment, content, and products, is effective. Additionally, it was observed that challenges arise from stakeholders, an inclusive perspective, and the resources of the school while supporting children's engagement. The researcher-teacher presents solutions to these challenges by offering training and consultations related to stakeholders, creating experiential opportunities linked to the inclusive process, and collaborating with institutions. Findings suggest that environmental arrangements, alongside the differentiation of learning processes, content, and products, significantly support children’s engagement.

Keywords

Inclusive education , early childhood , engagement , differentiation , adaptations

References

• Adams, T. E., Jones, S. H., & Ellis, C. (2016). Handbook of Autoethnography. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315427812
• Akın, G. (2019). Peer opinions regarding individual differences and social acceptance of the children with special needs in the early childhood period. (Master's Thesis). Anadolu University, Eskisehir.
• Allodi, M. W. (2010). The meaning of social climate of learning environments: Some reasons why we do not care enough about it. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9072-9
• Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2016). Inclusive education’s promises and trajectories: Critical notes about future research on a venerable idea. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 43. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1919
• Ayan Ceyhan, M. (2016). Inclusive Education: School Practices and Teacher Needs. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ERG_KapsayiciEgitim_OgretmenIhtiyaclari.pdf
• Bailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of social research. The Free Press.
• Barriault, C., & Pearson, D. (2010). Assessing Exhibits for Learning in Science Centers: A Practical Tool. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645571003618824
• Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.111
• Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000436
• Bohlmann, N. L., Downer, J. T., Williford, A. P., Maier, M. F., Booren, L. M., & Howes, C. (2019). Observing children’s engagement: Examining factorial validity of the inCLASS across demographic groups. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 60, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.08.007
• British Columbia Ministry of Children and Family Development. (2019). Inclusive Child Care Toolkit: Supporting Children of All Abilities. British Columbia.
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In Handbook of Child Psychology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
• Çelik, H. (2016). Culture and Personal Experience: Autoethnography as a Research Method. Istanbul Journal of Social Sciences, 6–1.
• Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (3rd ed.; S. B. Demir, Ed.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
• Curby, T. W., Downer, J. T., & Booren, L. M. (2014). Behavioral exchanges between teachers and children over the course of a typical preschool day: Testing bidirectional associations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.01.002
• Demirci-Ünal, Z., & Öztürk, G. (2024). Is Need-Based Action Possible for Each Child?: Preschool Teachers’ Differentiated Instruction Within Multicultural Classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01753-2
• Eğitimde Birlikteyiz. (2021). Retrieved June 18, 2024, from https://egitimdebirlikteyiz.meb.gov.tr/Materyaller/MateryalGrup/6
• Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
• Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in School and Out-of-School Contexts: A Multidimensional View of Engagement. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.607401
• Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
• Gandini, L. (2011). Connecting through caring and learning spaces. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Experience in Transformation (pp. 317–341). Praeger.
• Graham, L. J. (2020). Inclusive Education in the 21st Century. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
• Guralnick, M. J., & Bruder, M. B. P. (2016). Early Childhood Inclusion in the United States Goals, Current Status, and Future Directions. Infants & Young Children, 29(3), 166–177.
• Harper, L. V., & McCluskey, K. S. (2003). Teacher–child and child–child interactions in inclusive preschool settings: Do adults inhibit peer interactions? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(03)00025-5
• Hockett, J. (2018). Differentiation Handbook: Strategies and Examples: Grades K–2.
• Ihmeideh, F. (2019). Getting parents involved in children’s play: Qatari parents’ perceptions of and engagement with their children’s play. Education 3-13, 47(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2017.1399152
• Jensen, A. S., Broström, S., & Hansen, O. H. (2010). Critical perspectives on Danish early childhood education and care: Between the technical and the political. Early Years An International Journal of Research and Development, 30(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2010.506599
• Kasman, N., Kaseng, S., Hanafie, St. H., & Daeng, K. (2014). The Effectiveness of Stimulus to the Language Acquisition of Early Age Child. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.6.1315-1321
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
• Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
• LeMay, H. (2017). Administrator and Teacher Attitudes Toward Inclusion (Doctorate). East Tennessee State University.
• McWilliam, R. A., & Bailey, D. B. (1995). Effects of Classroom Social Structure and Disability on Engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112149501500201
• McWilliam, R. A., Trivette, C. M., & Dunst, C. J. (1985). Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5(1–2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0270-4684(85)80006-9
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th Edition). San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
• Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Second Edition). Sage Publications.
• Montes, F., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Evaluating traditional day care practices: An empirical approach. Child Care Quarterly, 4(3), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01559367
• Moody, A. K., Justice, L. M., & Cabell, S. Q. (2010). Electronic versus traditional storybooks: Relative influence on preschool children’s engagement and communication. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410372162
• Moore, F., Athif, A., Zaeema, A., & Hussain, Z. (2021). Inclusive Education Guidelines and Adaptations to Support the Implementation of the National Curriculum. https://ied.gov.mv/storage/uploads/brY4K6wB/hjav1tkg.pdf
• Nasim, M. (2017). An autoethnographic journey of an early childhood educator’s experience with implementing an emergent curriculum (Master). Nipissing University, Ontario.
• OECD. (2020). Education Policy Outlook Turkey. https://abdigm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_07/01163240_Egitim_PolitikasY_Gorunumu-TR_Profili_2020.pdf
• Özkan, U. B. (2023). Validity and Reliability in Document Analysis Method: A Theoretical Review in the Context of Educational Science Research, Buca Faculty of Education Journal, (56), 823–848.
• Patall, E. A. (2024). Agentic engagement: Transcending passive motivation. Motivation Science, 10(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000332
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Pek, E. (2023). Making the Researcher Subject of the Research: Auto-Ethnography and an Example of Auto-Ethnography: Kepanek Exhibition. International Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR). https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3438
• Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.001
• Prater, M. A., Dyches, T. T., & Johnstun, M. (2006). Teaching Students About Learning Disabilities Through Children’s Literature. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060420010301
• Rangvid, B. S. (2018). Student engagement in inclusive classrooms. Education Economics, 26(3), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1426733
• Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H.-R. (2019). A Teacher-Focused Intervention to Enhance Students’ Classroom Engagement. In Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions (pp. 87–102). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00007-3
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
• Sjöman, M., Granlund, M., & Almqvist, L. (2016). Interaction processes as a mediating factor between children’s externalized behaviour difficulties and engagement in preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 186(10), 1649–1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1121251
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
• Stringer, P. M. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement: a case study of a New Zealand primary school. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8(3), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-009-9073-6
• Stukat, K. G. (1995). Conductive education evaluated. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 10(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/0885625950100206
• Taylor, M., Alamos, P., Turnbull, K. L. P., LoCasale-Crouch, J., & Howes, C. (2023). Examining individual children’s peer engagement in pre-kindergarten classrooms: Relations with classroom-level teacher-child interaction quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 64, 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECRESQ.2023.04.007
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Paris.
• Vaughn, B. E., Santos, A. J., Monteiro, L., Shin, N., Daniel, J. R., Krzysik, L., & Pinto, A. (2016). Social engagement and adaptive functioning during early childhood: Identifying and distinguishing among subgroups differing with regard to social engagement. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1422–1434. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000142
• Williford, A. P., Vick Whittaker, J. E., Vitiello, V. E., & Downer, J. T. (2013). Children’s Engagement within the Preschool Classroom and Their Development of Self-Regulation. Early Education & Development, 24(2), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2011.628270
• Winter, S. M. (1999). The Early Childhood Inclusion Model: A Program for All Children (A. W. Bauer & B. Herzig, Eds.). Olney: Association for Childhood Education International.
• Xu, Y., Aubele, J., Vigil, V., Bustamante, A. S., Kim, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Dialogue with a conversational agent promotes children’s story comprehension via enhancing engagement. Child Development, 93(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13708
• Yılmaz Atman, B. (2023). Inclusive Early Childhood Classrooms and Instructional Adaptations (1.; B. Atman Yılmaz, Ed.). Ankara: Nobel.