Research Article

The Impact of Flipped Classroom Instruction on College EFL Trainees’ Reading Proficiency, Perceptions, and Engagement

Volume: 12 Number: 6 November 1, 2025

The Impact of Flipped Classroom Instruction on College EFL Trainees’ Reading Proficiency, Perceptions, and Engagement

Abstract

This study examines the impact of FCI versus Conventional Classroom Instruction (CCI) with Explicit Reading Instruction (ERI) on reading comprehension proficiency, engagement, and perceptions among English as Foreign Language (EFL) trainees at Injibara College, Ethiopia, during 2023. Using a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test non-equivalent group design, 53 participants were purposefully assigned to FCI (n = 28) and CCI (n = 25) groups. The intervention took place in the second semester over 12 weeks (February–May), with weekly one-hour sessions where both groups worked on identical reading materials from the same course. The FCI group prepared by viewing videos and reading materials before class and participated in collaborative, teacher-guided activities during sessions, whereas the CCI group received teacher-led explicit instruction in class followed by independent homework. Quantitative data were collected through four RCP assessments (pre-test, two interim tests, post-test) and questionnaires assessing engagement and perceptions. Qualitative data were gathered via interviews with six purposively selected FCI participants.Results indicated notable improvement in both groups, with the FCI group demonstrating greater and sustained gains, evidenced by a large effect size (η²ₚ = .305) and significant interaction effects (F(3,48) = 3.67, p = .015), reflecting progressive enhancement. Participants reported positive perceptions, emphasizing critical thinking, flexibility, and preparation, although some expressed reluctance to recommend FCI. Engagement scores indicated high cognitive, behavioural, and emotional involvement. Qualitative analysis revealed increased learner autonomy, deeper comprehension, and peer collaboration, despite initial workload and technological challenges. Overall, findings affirm FCI’s potential in EFL, influencing pedagogy, policy, technological integration, and innovative practices to sustain engagement and language proficiency. Results indicated notable improvement in both groups, with the FCI group demonstrating greater and sustained gains, evidenced by a large effect size (η²ₚ = .305) and significant interaction effects (F(3,48) = 3.67, p = .015), reflecting progressive enhancement. Participants reported positive perceptions, emphasizing critical thinking, flexibility, and preparation, although some expressed reluctance to recommend FCI. Engagement scores indicated high cognitive, behavioral, and emotional involvement. Qualitative analysis revealed increased learner autonomy, deeper comprehension, and peer collaboration, despite initial workload and technological challenges. Overall, findings affirm FCI’s potential in EFL, influencing pedagogy, policy, technological integration, and innovative practices to sustain engagement and language proficiency.

Keywords

flipped learning; , explicit reading instruction; , reading comprehension; , educational technology; , instructional perceptions in EFL , learner engagement

References

  1. Abaeian, H., & Samadi, L. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: Focusing on different proficiency levels. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 295–304. http://www.jallr.com
  2. Afrilyasanti, R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Astuti, U. P. (2017). Indonesian EFL students’ perceptions on the implementation of flipped classroom model. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 476-484.https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.05
  3. Afzali, Z., & Izadpanah, S. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on Iranian English foreign language learners: Engagement and motivation in English language grammar. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1870801.https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1870801
  4. Aksoy, B. N. Ç., & Tulgar, A. T. (2023). The Effects of Flipped Classroom on EFL Students' Autonomy and Motivation. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 27, 9-38. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1727
  5. Aljaraideh, Y. (2019). Students' perception of flipped classroom: A case study for private universities in Jordan. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 368-377. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.648
  6. Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017-1051.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09779-2
  7. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution (Vol. 22). Brill.https://brill.com/display/title/36570
  8. Amare, E. M., Zegeye, R. T., Wondie, S. G., Negash, T. T., & Siyoum, M. T. (2024). Getting ready for digital shift: the level of acceptance towards educational technology among faculty members in higher education institutions in Ethiopia. Discover Education, 3(1), 10. t https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00090-1.
  9. Anderson, L. W. (1999). Rethinking Bloom's Taxonomy: Implications for Testing and Assessment.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435630.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED435630
  10. Asratie, M. G., Wale, B. D., & Aylet, Y. T. (2023). Effects of using educational technology tools to enhance EFL students’ speaking performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10031-10051.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12060-5
APA
Yalew, G. D. (2025). The Impact of Flipped Classroom Instruction on College EFL Trainees’ Reading Proficiency, Perceptions, and Engagement. Participatory Educational Research, 12(6), 146-168. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.83.12.6