The Satisfaction Bridge: How Student Engagement Drives Student Loyalty Through Satisfaction in Higher Education

Year 2026, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 102 - 120, 08.03.2026

Shahzaf Iqbal , Mazhar Abbas Syed Muhammad Umer Saleem , Muhammad Junaid Iqbal

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.21.13.2

https://izlik.org/JA63UY24TA

Abstract

In an increasingly competitive higher education (HE) environment, fostering student loyalty is critical for institutional success. This study examines the effect of student engagement (SE) on student loyalty (SL), with student satisfaction (SS) as a mediator, in public and private universities in Pakistan. Grounded in Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT) and the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) model, the study addresses an empirical gap by investigating how engagement translates into loyalty through satisfaction. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted among final-year undergraduate and postgraduate students from multiple universities. Structural equation modeling was employed to test four hypotheses assessing direct and mediated relationships among SE, SS, and SL. The findings indicate that SE does not directly influence SL but exerts a significant indirect effect through SS, confirming satisfaction as a critical explanatory mechanism. These results underscore the importance of aligning engagement initiatives with student expectations to enhance satisfaction and foster loyalty. The study’s limitations include its cross-sectional design and the use of multistage sampling—random selection of universities followed by convenience sampling of respondents—which may limit generalizability. Additionally, focusing on final-year students may not capture engagement and satisfaction dynamics across the full academic lifecycle. Future research should adopt longitudinal designs, include broader student cohorts, and conduct cross-cultural comparisons. Overall, this study contributes to theory and practice by integrating ECT and the S-O-R model and by providing empirical evidence from an emerging HE context.

Keywords

higher education , student engagement , student loyalty , student satisfaction , quality education

References

• Ahmad, A., Mahayuddin, N., Fatimah, W. N., Nawi, W. M., Saad, M., & Ong, M. H. A. (2021). The Impact of University Entities on Students’ Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Student Satisfaction. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 29(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijema.v29i1.807
• Albaroudi, H. B., & Iqbal, S. (2025). Role of leadership styles in connecting quality culture and university performance: a higher education perspective from Saudi Arabia. The TQM Journal, 37(6), 1643–1665. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2024-0072
• Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2014-0008
• Ali, M., Amir, H., & Ahmed, M. (2024). The role of university switching costs, perceived service quality, perceived university image and student satisfaction in shaping student loyalty. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(1), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2021.1975184
• Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(5), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360601074315
• Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2010). The influence of university image on student behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011013060
• Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities: Development of HiEduQual. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 488–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2014-0010
• Arnab, R. (2017). Survey Sampling: Theory and Applications. London, UK: Elsevier Ltd.
• Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.
• Berhanu, K. L., & Sewagegn, A. A. (2024). The role of perceived campus climate in students’ academic achievements as mediated by students’ engagement in higher education institutions. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2377839
• Butt, B. Z., & Rehman, K. u. (2010). A study examining the students satisfaction in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5446–5450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.888
• Carmen-Herrera, Á. A., Villanueva-Quispe, W., & Millones-Liza, D. Y. (2025). Impact of Perceived Value Factors on Student Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Student Trust. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(1), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0025
• Chandra, T., Hafni, L., Chandra, S., Purwati, A. A., & Chandra, J. (2019). The influence of service quality, university image on student satisfaction and student loyalty. Benchmarking, 26(5), 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2018-0212
• Chandra, T., Ng, M., Chandra, S., & Priyono. (2018). The effect of service quality on student satisfaction and student loyalty: An empirical study. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.12590
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Second). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
• Doan, T. T. T. (2021). The Effect of Service Quality on Student Loyalty and Student Satisfaction: An Empirical Study of Universities in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(8), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no8.0251
• Douglas, J., McClelland, R., & Davies, J. (2008). The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810848396
• Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
• Fakhrudin, A. (2023). Analysis of the impact of campus image on student loyalty with student satisfaction as intervening variables. Journal of Economics and Public Health, 2(4), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.37287/jeph.v2i4.2376
• Fatima, M., & Khero, M. (2019). Factors Impacting the Student’s Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation of Higher Education Sector in Pakistan. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Research, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.31580/ijer.v1i2.475
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
• Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field. In Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions: Working with Disengaged Students (pp. 1–11). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00001-2
• Greeshma, P., Vijay, J., & Kumar, P. M. (2025). The expectation confirmation theory: A service perspective. GAP BODHI TARU, 8(1), 10–18. Retrieved from https://www.gapbodhitaru.org/res/articles/(10-18) THE EXPECTATION CONFIRMATION THEORY A SERVICE PERSPECTIVE.pdf
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Second). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2015.1005806
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Third). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/978-3-030-80519-7
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
• HEC. (2025). HEIs Statistics. Retrieved February 5, 2025, from Available Online website: https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/universities/hes/Pages/HEDR-Statistics.aspx
• Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E. (2007). What accounts for students’ loyalty? Some field study evidence. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710729926
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M. F., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and Managing Student Loyalty: An Approach Based on the Concept of Relationship Quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050134006
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Hochreiter, V., Benedetto, C., & Loesch, M. (2023). The Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Paradigm as a Guiding Principle in Environmental Psychology: Comparison of its Usage in Consumer Behavior and Organizational Culture and Leadership Theory. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development, 3(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.18775/jebd.31.5001
• Howson, C. K., & Matos, F. (2021). Student surveys: Measuring the relationship between satisfaction and engagement. Education Sciences, 11(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060297
• Ikram, M., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2023). Education quality and student satisfaction nexus using instructional material, support, classroom facilities, equipment and growth: Higher education perspective of Pakistan. Frontiers in Education, 8(March), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1140971
• Iqbal, S. (2024). ISO 9001 as a catalyst: linking staff training to university performance. TQM Journal, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2024-0216
• Iqbal, S., Azlan, C. A. B., Allumi, N. A., & Abbas, M. (2025). Quality-Driven Education: Analyzing the Effects of ISO 9001 Quality Management Principles on University Performance. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(4), 1146–1159. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i4.2994
• Iqbal, S., Taib, C. A. B., & Razalli, M. R. (2023). Examining the Effect of Accreditation on Higher Education Performance through Motivation as a Mediator. Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.46.10.3
• Jabeen, S., Hassan, K. H., & Akmal, F. (2023). Exploring the Role of Well-being for Improving Students’ Performance at Secondary Level in Pakistan. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 11(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v11i1.1418
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
• Kalam, A., & Hossain, M. A. (2023). Effects of Quality of Higher Education on Student Satisfaction and the Institutional Image. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 31(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2021.10049614
• Kankhuni, Z., Ngwira, C., Sepula, M. B., & Kapute, F. (2023). Modelling the relationship between higher education service quality, student engagement, attachment, satisfaction, and loyalty: a case of a Malawian public university. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 23(2), 229–252. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2022.2128983
• Khan, H., & Matlay, H. (2009). Implementing service excellence in higher education. Education and Training, 51(8), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910911005299
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
• Kuh, G. D. (2003). What We’re Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090
• Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge : M.I.T. Press.
• Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). Investigating Student Satisfaction in Online Learning: The Role of Student Interaction and Engagement in Distance Learning University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, (Special), 88–96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928
• Nguyen, H. V., Vu, T. D., Saleem, M., & Yaseen, A. (2024). The influence of service quality on student satisfaction and student loyalty in Vietnam: the moderating role of the university image. Journal of Trade Science, 12(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/jts-12-2023-0032
• Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
• Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4, Suppl 1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105
• Oplatka, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2021). A Systematic and Updated Review of the Literature on Higher Education Marketing 2005–2019. In Handbook ofOperations Research and Management Science in Higher Education (Vol. 309, pp. 35–80). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74051-1_2
• Osman, A. R., Joarder, M. H. R., Hoque, M. K., & Jakowan. (2024). Student engagement, brand image and loyalty relationships: The mediating role of student satisfaction. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 11(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i2.5553
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Qasem, A., & Bahafi, S. (2024). The Impact of Service Quality on Student’s Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction. Journal of Social Studies, 30(4), 68–101. https://doi.org/10.20428/jss.v30i4.2567
• Rahman, A. U., Manzoor, W., Yasmin, N., Yaqub, R. M. S., & Ali, M. S. (2024). From Service Quality to Brand Loyalty: The Mediating Effect of Student Satisfaction in Public Sector Universities. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 1225–1240. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i2.2215
• Saleem, S. S., Moosa, K., Imam, A., & Khan, R. A. (2017). Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of University Culture, Reputation and Price in Education Sector of Pakistan. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 10(1), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2017.217335.672304
• Satuti, J. R., Sunaryanto, & Nuris, D. M. (2020). Does Student Satisfaction Mediate the Correlation between E-Learning Service Quality, Academic Engagement and Academic Achievement? Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 5(1), 38–53. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v5i1.12699
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (Seventh). Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
• Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Estrada, J. M. ., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049
• Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2019). How service quality affects university brand performance, university brand image and behavioural intention: the mediating effects of satisfaction and trust and moderating roles of gender and study mode. Journal of Brand Management, 26(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0131-3
• Tahir, I., & Fatima, N. (2023). The impact of student engagement, quality of student faculty relationship and student loyalty on quality of higher education: A systematic literature review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(2), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.2.2314
• Tariq, J., Khan, K., Hussainy, S. K., & Tariq, S. (2020). Antecedents and Consequences of Student Loyalty in Higher Education. JISR Management and Social Sciences & Economics, 18(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.31384/jisrmsse/2020.18.2.3
• Thomas, E. H., & Galambos, N. (2004). What satisfies students? Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019589.79439.6e
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York, UK. Retrieved from https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/studentengagementliteraturereview_1_1568037028.pdf
• Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0090
• Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student Engagement: Current State of the Construct, Conceptual Refinement, and Future Research Directions. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 34). Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
• Zafar, S., & Nausheen, M. (2022). Influence of Student Engagement on Academic Challenges: Does Engagement Matter? Global Educational Studies Review, VII(II), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).29
• Zulfqar, A., Hussain, B., & Tufail, M. S. (2024). From Global Insights to Local Applications: Analyzing Student Engagement Strategies for Pakistani Higher Education. Journal of Education Research & Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 34–47. Retrieved from https://ojs.jerssr.org.pk/index.php/jerssr/article/view/267/147