Research Article

Effects of STEM Education on Unemployment Types: An Applied Science Case Study

Volume: 13 Number: 2 March 8, 2026

Effects of STEM Education on Unemployment Types: An Applied Science Case Study

Abstract

Rapid technological transformation and digitalization have reshaped labor markets by changing skill demands and affecting various types of unemployment. In this context, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education has gained prominence as a means of equipping individuals with 21st-century skills and improving employability. This study investigates teachers’ perceptions of STEM education’s impact on different unemployment types. A total of 45 teachers were selected through criterion sampling, and data were collected using a semi-structured interview form and analyzed with inductive content analysis within a structured qualitative design. Findings indicate that teachers view STEM education as reducing multiple unemployment types, especially involuntary, frictional, cyclical, structural, hidden, technological, and seasonal unemployment, by enhancing qualified human capital, fostering interdisciplinary skills, promoting entrepreneurship and innovation, and supporting adaptability and lifelong learning. However, participants noted its limited effect on natural and real wage unemployment. Expectations of higher wage demands and labor substitution by technology suggest STEM education may not significantly reduce voluntary or real wage unemployment and could even increase technological unemployment. Overall, STEM education is regarded as a strategic tool for improving employment outcomes, although its effectiveness depends on economic conditions and public policies, highlighting the need for future research using mixed methods and multiple stakeholders to better understand its relationship with labor market dynamics.

Keywords

STEM , unemployment , teacher , education

References

  1. Akcan, A. T., Yıldırım, B., Karataş, A. R., & Yılmaz, M. (2023). Teachers’ views on the effect of STEM education on the labor market. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184730
  2. Alam, M. J., Reza, S. M. A., Ogawa, K., & Ahsan, A. H. M. (2024). Sustainable employment for vocational education and training graduates: The case of future skills matching in Bangladesh. International Journal of Training Research, 22(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2024.2308224
  3. Amrahi Tabieh, A., Pashazadeh, F., Safaiyan, A., & Matlabi, H. (2025). Job skill training for re-employment of the older workers: A scoping review. Educational Gerontology, 51(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2024.2392921
  4. Bacovic, M., Andrijasevic, Z., & Pejovic, B. (2022). STEM Education and growth in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2348–2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00817-7
  5. Bai, S., & Tian, P. (2025). Educational robotics may enhance students’ conceptual knowledge, applied skills, and learning attitude in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 28(4), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202510_28(4).SP06
  6. Bansal, K., & Mathur, T. (2024). Impact of skills development on youth unemployment: A fractional-order mathematical model. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 47(18), 14286–14303. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.10272
  7. Billing, C., Bramley, G., Ioramashvili, C., Lynam, R., Zorrilla, M. C., Collinson, S., Humphreys, K., Kollydas, K., Pan, F., Pugh, A., Sevinc, D., & Yuan, P.-Y. (2023). The impact of university STEM assets: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0287005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287005
  8. Black, S. E., Muller, C., Spitz-Oener, A., He, Z., Hung, K., & Warren, J. R. (2021). The importance of STEM: High school knowledge, skills and occupations in an era of growing inequality. Research Policy, 50(7), 104249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104249
  9. Boyd, M., & Tian, S. (2018). Is STEM education portable? Country of education and the economic integration of STEM immigrants. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 19(4), 965–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0570-4
  10. Brunow, S., Birkeneder, A., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). Creative and science oriented employees and firm-level innovation. Cities, 78, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.002
APA
Gündüz, Ş., Akcan, A. T., Yildirim, B., & Kazak, H. (2026). Effects of STEM Education on Unemployment Types: An Applied Science Case Study. Participatory Educational Research, 13(2), 248-269. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.28.13.2