Research Article

Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills

Volume: 13 Number: 3 May 4, 2026

Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills

Abstract

This study investigated the predictive role of teachers’ learning agility in explaining their 21st-century teaching skills using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The sample comprised 302 teachers recruited through convenience sampling. Learning agility is mainly/oftentimes conceptualized as a multidimensional construct including self-awareness, people agility, results agility, change agility, and mental agility. Teachers’ 21st-century teaching skills were assessed with an 18-item instrument adapted from an established framework and refined for use in the present study. The findings indicated that the dimensions of learning agility do not contribute equally to teachers’ 21st-century teaching skills. Self-awareness, people agility, and results agility were significant positive predictors, whereas change agility and mental agility did not show significant direct effects. Collectively, the learning agility dimensions explained 37.8% of the variance in teachers’ 21st-century teaching skills, suggesting a meaningful level of explanatory power. Overall, the results suggest that learning agility functions as a higher-order meta-competence that supports the development and sustained enactment of contemporary teaching skills rather than representing the direct content of those skills. The study extends learning agility research to the teaching profession and offers practical implications for teacher education and professional development programs, particularly those aiming to strengthen reflective capacity, interpersonal effectiveness, and performance-oriented learning.

Keywords

self-awareness, people agility, results agility, learning agility, 21st-century teaching skills, partial least squares structural equation modeling

Ethical Statement

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Anadolu University (Approval number: 454944).

Thanks

This study is a summary of the first author’s master’s thesis, which was conducted by the supervision of the second author.

References

  1. Akkoyunlu, B., & Yılmaz Soylu, M. (2018). The importance of creative writing in fostering 21st-century skills. In B. Akkoyunlu, A. İşman, & H. F. Odabaşı (Eds.), Educational technology readings 2018 (pp. 1–14). Pegem Academy.
  2. Asad, M. M., Aftab, K., Sherwani, F., Churi, P., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & Pourshahian, B. (2021). Techno‐pedagogical skills for 21st century digital classrooms: An extensive literature review. Education Research International, 2021(1), 8160084. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8160084
  3. Astuti, A. P., Aziz, A., Bharati, D. A. L. & Sumarti, S. S., (2019). Preparing 21st century teachers: Implementation of 4C character’s pre-service teacher through teaching practice. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1233, No. 1, p. 012109). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012109
  4. Burke, W. W., Roloff, K. S., & Mitchinson, A. (2016). Learning agility: A new model and measure. Teachers College Press.
  5. Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Teachers' sense of adaptability: Examining links with perceived autonomy support, teachers' psychological functioning, and students' numeracy achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.003
  6. Crompton, H. (2023). Evidence of the ISTE Standards for Educators leading to learning gains. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2244089
  7. Day, C. (2017). Teachers’ worlds and work: Understanding complexity, building quality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170091
  8. De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., & Hallenbeck, G. S. (2010). Learning agility: A construct whose time has come. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 119–130.
  9. De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., Eichinger, R. W., Page, R. C., Clark, L. P., & Zewdie, S. (2011). The development and validation of a self-assessment of learning agility. Proceedings of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference (pp. 1–32), Chicago, IL.
  10. DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01444.x
APA
Derelioğlu, Ş., Kurt, A. A., & Doğan, E. (2026). Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills. Participatory Educational Research, 13(3), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.42.13.3
AMA
1.Derelioğlu Ş, Kurt AA, Doğan E. Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills. PER. 2026;13(3):221-238. doi:10.17275/per.26.42.13.3
Chicago
Derelioğlu, Şevval, Adile Aşkım Kurt, and Ezgi Doğan. 2026. “Learning Agility As a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills”. Participatory Educational Research 13 (3): 221-38. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.42.13.3.
EndNote
Derelioğlu Ş, Kurt AA, Doğan E (May 1, 2026) Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills. Participatory Educational Research 13 3 221–238.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Derelioğlu, A. A. Kurt, and E. Doğan, “Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills”, PER, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 221–238, May 2026, doi: 10.17275/per.26.42.13.3.
ISNAD
Derelioğlu, Şevval - Kurt, Adile Aşkım - Doğan, Ezgi. “Learning Agility As a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills”. Participatory Educational Research 13/3 (May 1, 2026): 221-238. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.42.13.3.
JAMA
1.Derelioğlu Ş, Kurt AA, Doğan E. Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills. PER. 2026;13:221–238.
MLA
Derelioğlu, Şevval, et al. “Learning Agility As a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 13, no. 3, May 2026, pp. 221-38, doi:10.17275/per.26.42.13.3.
Vancouver
1.Şevval Derelioğlu, Adile Aşkım Kurt, Ezgi Doğan. Learning Agility as a Predictor of 21st-Century Teaching Skills. PER. 2026 May 1;13(3):221-38. doi:10.17275/per.26.42.13.3