Research Article

Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis

Volume: 13 Number: 6 November 1, 2026

Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping the structure and pedagogy of contemporary education systems. This study examines Türkiye’s strategic vision and institutional orientations toward AI in education by analyzing official policy documents and mapping their theoretical foundations within a structured conceptual framework. This study employed a qualitative document analysis design, examining 14 policy documents, strategic plans, ethical guidelines, and curriculum documents published by the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, the Ministry of National Education, the Council of Higher Education, and TÜBİTAK between 2021 and 2029. The data were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and the documents were thematically coded using NVivo. The findings indicate that official education policy documents frame AI as a multidimensional paradigm shaped by institutional priorities. AI integration is presented as a predominantly top-down process, with official documents emphasizing advanced engineering applications for secondary education and gifted students, while AI applications for preschool and primary education receive comparatively less attention. AI is portrayed as a tool that supports instructional design while reducing teachers’ administrative and academic workload. At the same time, the ‘human-in-the-loop’ principle is identified as a core safeguard within the national policy framework. The analysis also reveals a restrictive approach to the use of AI in academic assessment. Based on these findings, the study proposes several policy recommendations. These include integrating age-appropriate AI activities into primary education curricula, establishing standardized data anonymization principles to protect student information, and redesigning pre-service and in-service teacher education through practice-oriented professional development aligned with teachers’ evolving roles.

Keywords

artificial intelligence in education, education policies, educational technologies, AI literacy, document analysis.

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant or financial support from any institution.

Ethical Statement

This study did not involve experiments on humans or animals. Therefore, ethical approval was not required.

References

  1. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational researcher, 36(5), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
  2. Bender, E. M, Gebru, T, McMillan-Major, A, & Shmitchell, S. (2021, March). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 610-623). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
  3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  4. Chan, C. K. Y, & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  5. Department for Education [DfE]. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/generative-artificial-intelligence-in-education/generative-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education
  6. Dülger, E. D, & Gümüşeli, A. İ. (2023). Views of school principals and teachers on using artificial intelligence in education. ISPEC International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 7(1), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7766578
  7. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206
  8. İncemen, S, & Öztürk, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in various educational areas: Application examples. International Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12600022
  9. Lincoln, Y. S, & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications
  10. Long, D, & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
APA
Oruç, T., Kurt, M., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2026). Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 13(6), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.81.13.6
AMA
1.Oruç T, Kurt M, Korkmaz Ö. Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis. PER. 2026;13(6):124-144. doi:10.17275/per.26.81.13.6
Chicago
Oruç, Taha, Murat Kurt, and Özgen Korkmaz. 2026. “Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis”. Participatory Educational Research 13 (6): 124-44. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.81.13.6.
EndNote
Oruç T, Kurt M, Korkmaz Ö (November 1, 2026) Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis. Participatory Educational Research 13 6 124–144.
IEEE
[1]T. Oruç, M. Kurt, and Ö. Korkmaz, “Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis”, PER, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 124–144, Nov. 2026, doi: 10.17275/per.26.81.13.6.
ISNAD
Oruç, Taha - Kurt, Murat - Korkmaz, Özgen. “Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis”. Participatory Educational Research 13/6 (November 1, 2026): 124-144. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.81.13.6.
JAMA
1.Oruç T, Kurt M, Korkmaz Ö. Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis. PER. 2026;13:124–144.
MLA
Oruç, Taha, et al. “Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 13, no. 6, Nov. 2026, pp. 124-4, doi:10.17275/per.26.81.13.6.
Vancouver
1.Taha Oruç, Murat Kurt, Özgen Korkmaz. Türkiye’s Vision for Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Document Analysis. PER. 2026 Nov. 1;13(6):124-4. doi:10.17275/per.26.81.13.6