Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Reasoning Types of Generalization and Justification on a Figural Pattern Task
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine how pre-service elementary teachers generalize a non-linear figural pattern task and justify their generalizations. More specifically, this study focuses on strategies and reasoning types employed by pre-service elementary teachers throughout generalization and justification processes. Data were collected from 32 pre-service elementary teachers who were enrolled in the Elementary Teacher Education program of a university, Turkey. During the data collection process, these pre-service teachers were first asked to generalize a non-linear figural pattern task and were then asked to justify their generalizations. To analyze the pre-service elementary teachers’ written answers for the task considering reasoning types for both generalization and justification, data reduction and constant comparative methodologies were used (Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2014). The findings indicated that the pre-service teachers were better able to find a rule for the pattern using the explicit strategy. It was also found that although these pre-service teachers used different types of reasoning which were numerical reasoning, figural reasoning, and pragmatic reasoning, figural reasoning was the most frequent one throughout the generalization process. Reasoning types for justification by the pre-service teachers fell into two categories: inductive and deductive. Most pre-service teachers resorted to inductive reasoning; however, there were a few pre-service teachers who referred to deductive reasoning. In addition, the pre-service teachers who articulated figural reasoning to generalize appeared to be more successful in justifying their developed rules deductively.
Keywords
figural pattern task, generalization, justification, reasoning
References
- Barbosa, A., & Vale, I. (2015). Visualization in pattern generalization: Potential and Challenges. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10, 57-70.
- Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2005). Generalization strategies of beginning high school algebra students. In H. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 121-128). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
- Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2006). Establishing and justifying algebraic generalization at the sixth grade level. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 465-472). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
- Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2007). Factors affecting seventh graders’ cognitive perceptions of patterns involving constructive and deconstructive generalization. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 129-136). Seoul, Korea: PME
- Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp. 5-23). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Chua, B. L., & Hoyles, C. (2012). The effect of different pattern formats on secondary two students’ ability to generalize. In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 155-162). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.
- Dörfler, W. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. ZDM, 40(1), 143-160.
- Ellis, A. B. (2007). Connections between generalizing and justifying: Students’ reasoning with linear relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 194-229.
- Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DRN based instruction. In S. Campbell & R. Zaskis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory, journal of mathematical behavior (pp. 185-212). New Jersey: Albex.
- Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1989). The general, the abstract, and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38-42.
