Research Article

Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables

Volume: 8 Number: 1 January 1, 2021
EN

Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate both student-level and school-level factors influencing reading literacy of students in Turkey by using PISA 2018 data. The study focused on reading literacy since the main subject of PISA 2018 was selected as reading literacy. The design of the study is a correlational research examining the relationship between student and school variables and reading literacy. The stratified random sample consisted of 6890 15-year students from 186 different schools. Data coming from PISA 2018 dataset were analysed by Hierarchical Linear Modelling (HLM) at student and school levels. Student-level variables of disciplinary climate in test language lessons, enjoyment of reading, information and community technologies (ICT) competence, parental emotional support, perceived discriminating climate, and perceived cooperation significantly predicted reading literacy, while reading literacy was also predicted by school-level variables of proportion of parents involved in the school, shortage of educational material, student behaviour hindering learning, and teacher behaviour hindering learning. Fifty-seven percent of variance between reading literacy scores of the students were caused by differences between schools. Student-level variables which are disciplinary climate in test language lessons, enjoyment of reading, ICT competence, parental emotional support, perceived discriminating climate, and perceived cooperation significantly predicted reading literacy. On the other hand, school-level variables predicting reading literacy significantly were proportion of parents involved in the school, shortage of educational material, student behaviour hindering learning, and teacher behaviour hindering learning. By considering results of the current study, collaboration between school stakeholders is recommended to increase performance of the students.

Keywords

PISA 2018, Reading literacy, ICT competence, Student Behavior, Hierarchical Linear Modelling

References

  1. Acar, T., & Öğretmen, T. (2012). Çok düzeyli istatistiksel yöntemler ile 2006 PISA fen bilimleri performansının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 178-189.
  2. Acar, T. (2015). Examination of the PISA 2009 reading skills and information and communication technology (ICT) use skills of Turkish students. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(13), 1825. Doi: 10.5897/ERR2015.231
  3. Aksu, G., Güzeller, C. O., & Eser, M. T. (2017). Öğrencilerin matematik okuryazarlığı performanslarının aşamalı doğrusal model (HLM) ile incelenmesi: PISA 2012 Türkiye örneği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(191). doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.6956.
  4. Akyüz, G., & Pala, N. M. (2010). The effect of student and class characteristics on mathematics literacy and problem solving in PISA 2003. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 668-678.
  5. Alacacı, C. & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2010), 182-192. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.03.006.
  6. Åström, M., & Karlsson, K. G. (2007). Using hierarchical linear models to test differences in Swedish results from OECD’s PISA 2003: Integrated and subject-specific science education. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 3(2), 121-131.
  7. Aytekin, G. K., & Tertemiz, N. I. (2018). PISA sonuçlarının (2003-2015) eğitim sistemi ve ekonomik göstergeler kapsamında incelenmesi: Türkiye ve Güney Kore örneği. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 103-128. doi: 10.29299/kefad.2018.19.004.
  8. Barro, R. J. (2013). Education and economic growth. Annals of Economics and Finance, 14 (2), 277-304.
  9. Berberoğlu, G., Çalışkan, M., & Karslı, N. (2019). Variables predicting PISA scientific literacy scores in Turkey. International Journal of Science and Education, 2(2), 38-49.
  10. Bilicioğlu, A., & Yılmaz, K. (2017). Öğrencilerin sınav kaygısı, fene yönelik ilgi ve ebeveyn desteği değişkenleri üzerine uluslararası bir karşılaştırma: Türkiye–Singapur. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1201-1220.
APA
Ertem, H. Y. (2021). Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.14.8.1
AMA
1.Ertem HY. Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. PER. 2021;8(1):248-264. doi:10.17275/per.21.14.8.1
Chicago
Ertem, Hasan Yücel. 2021. “Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Scores Within Student-Level and School-Level Variables”. Participatory Educational Research 8 (1): 248-64. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.14.8.1.
EndNote
Ertem HY (January 1, 2021) Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. Participatory Educational Research 8 1 248–264.
IEEE
[1]H. Y. Ertem, “Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables”, PER, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 248–264, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.14.8.1.
ISNAD
Ertem, Hasan Yücel. “Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Scores Within Student-Level and School-Level Variables”. Participatory Educational Research 8/1 (January 1, 2021): 248-264. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.14.8.1.
JAMA
1.Ertem HY. Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. PER. 2021;8:248–264.
MLA
Ertem, Hasan Yücel. “Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Scores Within Student-Level and School-Level Variables”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 248-64, doi:10.17275/per.21.14.8.1.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Yücel Ertem. Examination of Turkey’s PISA 2018 reading literacy scores within student-level and school-level variables. PER. 2021 Jan. 1;8(1):248-64. doi:10.17275/per.21.14.8.1

Cited By