Research Article

Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style

Volume: 8 Number: 1 January 1, 2021
EN

Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the change of cognitive presence (CP), which is one of the basic variables for effective learning in online discussions, based on the cognitive style. Cognitive styles of the participants were identified based on the group embedded figures test (GEFT). The participants of the study took part in online discussions for seven weeks. Content analysis was used to measure cognitive presence in students’ online discussions. The analysis was based on practical inquiry (PI) model which defines four phases of cognitive presence. The data were also analysed using the nonparametric tests, Spearman Rhu correlation, and descriptive statistics. The findings indicate that, in regard to the cognitive presence of the participants, those phases with the highest frequency are found to be exploration and triggering event. It is also found that the CPs of the participants do not vary based on their cognitive styles. In addition, unlike what was reported by previous studies there are no significant differences between the number of words used by the participants and the rate of involvement in online discussions depending on their CPs. On the other hand, there are moderate and strong correlations between the participants’ CP phases suggesting that the CP phases may be developed in relation to one another. Based on the findings, some suggestions are developed in regard to the scope of learning analytics and discussion dynamics concerning the discussion environments in online learning. 

Keywords

Cognitive presence, cognitive style, field dependence, online discussions, higher level online learning, online participation

References

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
  2. Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The internet and higher education, 13(1-2), 37-44.
  3. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2003). Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: Perceptions of native and non-native students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 24-46.
  4. Chang, B., Chen, S. Y., & Jhan, S. N. (2015). The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Computers & Education, 88, 399-407.
  5. Chen, H. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2017). Integrating the SOP 2 Model into the Flipped Classroom to Foster Cognitive Presence and Learning Achievements. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1).
  6. Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216-227.
  7. Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence–independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence–independence: Cognitive styles across the lifespan (pp. 149–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. DeNoyelles, A., Zydney, J. M., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions. Journal of online learning and teaching, 10(1), 153-165.
  9. Du, H. S., & Wagner, C. (2007). Learning with weblogs: Enhancing cognitive and social knowledge construction. IEEE Transactions on professional communication, 50(1), 1-16.
  10. Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 157.
APA
Sezgin, S. (2021). Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 344-361. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.20.8.1
AMA
1.Sezgin S. Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style. PER. 2021;8(1):344-361. doi:10.17275/per.21.20.8.1
Chicago
Sezgin, Sezan. 2021. “Cognitive Relations in Online Learning: Change of Cognitive Presence and Participation in Online Discussions Based on Cognitive Style”. Participatory Educational Research 8 (1): 344-61. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.20.8.1.
EndNote
Sezgin S (January 1, 2021) Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style. Participatory Educational Research 8 1 344–361.
IEEE
[1]S. Sezgin, “Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style”, PER, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 344–361, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.20.8.1.
ISNAD
Sezgin, Sezan. “Cognitive Relations in Online Learning: Change of Cognitive Presence and Participation in Online Discussions Based on Cognitive Style”. Participatory Educational Research 8/1 (January 1, 2021): 344-361. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.20.8.1.
JAMA
1.Sezgin S. Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style. PER. 2021;8:344–361.
MLA
Sezgin, Sezan. “Cognitive Relations in Online Learning: Change of Cognitive Presence and Participation in Online Discussions Based on Cognitive Style”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 344-61, doi:10.17275/per.21.20.8.1.
Vancouver
1.Sezan Sezgin. Cognitive relations in online learning: Change of cognitive presence and participation in online discussions based on cognitive style. PER. 2021 Jan. 1;8(1):344-61. doi:10.17275/per.21.20.8.1