Research Article

Investigation of Classroom Teachers' Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices

Volume: 8 Number: 4 December 1, 2021
EN

Investigation of Classroom Teachers' Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices

Abstract

The 21st century requires different and innovative ways of teaching compared to the previous century. As a result, a new and current educational approach called innovative pedagogy comes out as an issue. This study aims to investigate classroom teachers’ innovative pedagogical practices with different variables, as well as the contributing or deteriorating factors that affect the relevant processes. The study was designed based on the descriptive survey method in which quantitative and qualitative data were used. The Innovative Pedagogical Practices Scale for Teachers was applied to 961 classroom teachers and the obtained data were analysed with descriptive statistics and parametric tests. Then an interview form was prepared and 30 classroom teachers were asked to fill the form. The obtained data analysed with the descriptive analysis method. The findings showed that classroom teachers frequently use innovative pedagogical practices in their classrooms to fulfil the requirement of the learner-centred educational approach. Besides, teachers’ participation in professional courses, the number of scientific events attended and the type of books teachers read were determined to be contributing variables for teachers to implement innovative pedagogical practices. However, the teachers faced such problems as the intensity of curriculum, equipment, and technical deficiencies and inadequate readiness level of students.

Keywords

innovative pedagogy, classroomteachers, 21st century skills

Supporting Institution

Dicle Üniversitesi Bilimsel araştırmalar Merkezi

Project Number

ZGEF.18.014

Thanks

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Center of Dicle University with the project number of ZGEF.18.014.

References

  1. Abbak, Y. (2018). Investigation of levels innovations and lifelong learning competencies of teachers]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Erciyes University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Kayseri.
  2. Akay, C. (2015). Öğrenmeyi etkileyen temel faktörler ve genel öğrenme ve öğretme ilkeleri. In Yanpar Yelken, T. & Akay, C. (Eds.) Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri[Teaching Principles and Methods]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  3. Akçay, N. O. (2016). Determining the views and adequacy of the preschool teachers related to science activities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 821-829.
  4. Akdeniz, A. & Kadı, A. (2016, Aralık). Investigating individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies of students in TMSC. ICLEL Conferences Sakarya University Faculty of Education, Sakarya, TURKEY.
  5. Argon, T., Menep, İ., & Bayram, T. Y. (2010). Knowledge culture in a university: AIBU education faculty case. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 1(20), 69-83.
  6. Bitkin, A. (2012). The relationship between individual innovativeness levels and information acquisition competencies of prospective teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Harran University Institue of Social Sciences, Urfa.
  7. Bozpolat, E. (2010). An assessment of prospective teachers’ attitudes towards reading habit: Case of Cumhuriyet Unıversity education faculty Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 2(1), 411-428.
  8. Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (2001). Eager to Learn. Eager to Learn. Washington DC: NAtional Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226.
  9. Camci, F. (2012). Effects of activity based teaching grounded on active learning on students? academic skills and learning process [Unpublished master’s thesis). Adiyaman University, Institute of Science, Adiyaman.
  10. Can, S., & Çava, G. (2018). Evaluation of play and physical activities course taught in elementary schools on the basis of classroom. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 261-273.
APA
Süer, S., & Oral, B. (2021). Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices. Participatory Educational Research, 8(4), 253-273. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.89.8.4
AMA
1.Süer S, Oral B. Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices. PER. 2021;8(4):253-273. doi:10.17275/per.21.89.8.4
Chicago
Süer, Sedef, and Behçet Oral. 2021. “Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices”. Participatory Educational Research 8 (4): 253-73. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.89.8.4.
EndNote
Süer S, Oral B (December 1, 2021) Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices. Participatory Educational Research 8 4 253–273.
IEEE
[1]S. Süer and B. Oral, “Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices”, PER, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 253–273, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.17275/per.21.89.8.4.
ISNAD
Süer, Sedef - Oral, Behçet. “Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices”. Participatory Educational Research 8/4 (December 1, 2021): 253-273. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.89.8.4.
JAMA
1.Süer S, Oral B. Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices. PER. 2021;8:253–273.
MLA
Süer, Sedef, and Behçet Oral. “Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 4, Dec. 2021, pp. 253-7, doi:10.17275/per.21.89.8.4.
Vancouver
1.Sedef Süer, Behçet Oral. Investigation of Classroom Teachers’ Views towards Innovative Pedagogical Practices. PER. 2021 Dec. 1;8(4):253-7. doi:10.17275/per.21.89.8.4