Research Article

The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate

Volume: 9 Number: 3 May 1, 2022
EN

The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to reveal the relationship between secondary school teachers’ perception of organizational justice and their perception of school climate. The research is a relational descriptive study in which the survey model is used. The sample of the study consists of 370 teachers selected by convenient sampling method among the teachers working in the general and imam hatip secondary schools in Izmit district of Kocaeli province in the academic year 2020-2021. "Organizational Justice Scale" and "Organizational Climate Scale" were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the data, Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for the relationship between variables, and simple linear regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed for predictive variables. As a result of the study, it was determined that there is a positive, moderately significant relationship between organizational justice and school climate. It was found that teachers’ perceptions of organizational justice are a significant predictor of school climate, and the order of importance of the sub-dimensions of organizational justice in explaining school climate is “procedural justice”, “distributive justice”, and “interactional justice”. In addition, the research findings show that organizational justice affects the supportive principal behavior, which is one of the sub-dimensions of the school climate, the most.

Keywords

orgnizational justice, school climate, secondary school, teacher

Thanks

This article has been produced from Mustafa KEMER's Master's thesis titled "The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate" supervised by Prof. Dr. Soner POLAT.

References

  1. Achmadi, A. (2016). The effect of leadership behavior, justice and organizational climate on dignity behavior. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(8), 115-120.
  2. Açıkgöz, A. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinin çatışma yönetim stilleri ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet algısı arasındaki ilişki [Conflict management styles of school, administrators and the relationship between organizational justice]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Abant Izzet Baysal University, Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.
  3. Alazmi, A. A. & Alenezi, A. S. (2020). Exploring the mediating role of trust in principal on the relationship between organizational justice and teacher commitment in Kuwait. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-17. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2020.1832705.
  4. Altınkurt, Y. & Yılmaz, K. (2010). Değerlere göre yönetim ve örgütsel adalet ilişkisinin ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between management by values and organizational justice by secondary school teachers’ perceptions]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 4(4), 463-485.
  5. Aquino, K. (1995). Relationships among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8(1), 21-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF02621253.
  6. Balcı, A. (2001). Örgütsel gelişme: Kuram ve uygulama [Organizational development: Theory and practice]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  7. Balı, A. Ş. (2001). Çok kültürlülük ve sosyal adalet: "Öteki" ile barış içinde birlikte yaşamak [Multiculturalism and social justice: To live together in peace with the “Other”]. Konya: Çizgi Bookstore.
  8. Barling, J. & Phillips, M. (1993). Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace: An exploratory study. The Journal of Psychology, 127(6), 649-656. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1993.9914904.
  9. Beugre, C. D. (1998). Managing fairness in organizations. London: Greenwood.
  10. Cansoy, R. & Polatcan, M. (2018). Türkiye’de okullarda örgütsel adalet araştırmaları: Ampirik araştırmalara bir bakış [Research on organizational justice in Turkish schools: a review of literature]. Turkish Studies, 13(4), 163-184.
APA
Kemer, M., & Polat, S. (2022). The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.59.9.3
AMA
1.Kemer M, Polat S. The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate. PER. 2022;9(3):148-165. doi:10.17275/per.22.59.9.3
Chicago
Kemer, Mustafa, and Soner Polat. 2022. “The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate”. Participatory Educational Research 9 (3): 148-65. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.59.9.3.
EndNote
Kemer M, Polat S (May 1, 2022) The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate. Participatory Educational Research 9 3 148–165.
IEEE
[1]M. Kemer and S. Polat, “The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate”, PER, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 148–165, May 2022, doi: 10.17275/per.22.59.9.3.
ISNAD
Kemer, Mustafa - Polat, Soner. “The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate”. Participatory Educational Research 9/3 (May 1, 2022): 148-165. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.59.9.3.
JAMA
1.Kemer M, Polat S. The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate. PER. 2022;9:148–165.
MLA
Kemer, Mustafa, and Soner Polat. “The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate”. Participatory Educational Research, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2022, pp. 148-65, doi:10.17275/per.22.59.9.3.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Kemer, Soner Polat. The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers’ Perception of Organizational Justice and School Climate. PER. 2022 May 1;9(3):148-65. doi:10.17275/per.22.59.9.3