An analysis of online privacy concerns of teacher candidates

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 15 - 25, 01.12.2019

Agâh Tuğrul Korucu , Şerife Gürkez

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.9.6.2

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Examining
the online privacy concerns of our prospective teachers who will raise our
future generations is important in terms of determining and increasing the
awareness levels of prospective teachers of the digital world and for the
development of a conscious generation having this awareness while raising
students. The definition of cyber space or virtual environments has further
expanded; digital business applications, online services, online training
systems, e-commerce sites, social media sites, and surely multiplayer video
games have also been included in the definition. The definition of these
digital spaces as virtual spaces creates questions as to how individuals exist
in these places and how they travel in these places. This study, whose aim is to
analyze online confidentiality concerns of prospective teachers in terms of
various variables, consists of 92 teacher candidates who were studying in
Necmettin Erbakan University of Konya in 2018-2019 academic year. In this
study, where quantitative research was adopted, surveying model was used as a
research method. The data collection tool was “The Online Privacy Concern Scale
(OPCS)” developed. Descriptive statistics, Independent samples t-test and
one-way analysis of variance were used during the analysis. It is found out
that online privacy concerns of teacher candidates differ significantly in
terms of mobile device usage times and classes. However there was no
significant difference in online privacy concerns in terms of information and
communication technologies usage levels, weekly Internet usage times, gender,
department, age and mobile usage level. 

Keywords

online privacy, teacher candidates, anxiety, Internet

References

• Alakurt, T. (2017). Adaptation of Online Privacy Concern Scale into Turkish culture. Pegem Journal of Education and Training, 7(4), 611-636.
• Aslanyürek, M. (2016). İnternet ve sosyal medya kullanıcılarının internet güvenliği ve çevrimiçi gizlilik ile ilgili kanaatleri ve farkındalıkları [Opinion and awareness of internet and social media users about internet security and online privacy]. Journal of Maltepe University Faculty of Communication, 3(1), 80–106.
• Benedikt, M. (1991) Cyberspace: First steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Bergström, A. (2015). Online privacy concerns: A Broad approach to understanding the concerns of different groups for different uses. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 419–426.
• Çelikoğlu N. (2008). Mahremiyet [Privacy]. İskenderiye Pub. , İstanbul.
• Derin, G. D., & Yurtdaş, G. T. (2017). Facebook kullanmama tercihinin kendini açma biçimi ve etkileşim kaygısı bağlamında incelenmesi [Investigation of not using Facebook in the context of self-disclosure and interaction anxiety]. Journal of Communication Theory and Research, 1(45), 25–44.
• De Wolf, R., Willaert, K. & Pierson, J. (2014). Managing privacy boundaries to gether: Exploring individual and group privacy management strategies in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 444-454.
• Hoy, M. G. & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 28-45.
• Karaarslan, E., Eren, M. B., & Koç, S. (2014). Çevrimiçi Mahremiyet: Teknik ve Hukuksal Durum İncelemesi [Online Privacy: Technical and Legal Situation Review]. Internet Conference Proceedings in Turkey, İzmir.
• Külcü, Ö. & Henkoğlu, T. (2014). Privacy in social networks: An analysis of Facebook. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 761-769.
• Külcü, Ö., & Henkoğlu, T. (2015). Privacy on Social Networks: Facebook Review. Information World, 15(2).
• Metin, M. (2014). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Scientific Research Methods in Education from Theory to Practice]. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
• Raad, E., & Chbeir, R. (2013). Privacy in online social networks, In R. Chbeir, & B. Al Bouna (Eds.), Security and Privacy Preserving in Social Networks (pp. 3-45). Springer, http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/97/59/98/PDF/Privacy_in_Online_Social_Networks .pdf (Erişim: 23-07-2014)
• Şener, G. (2013). Sosyal ağlarda mahremiyet ve yeni mahremiyet stratejileri [Privacy and new privacy strategies in social networks]. First National Congress of New Media Studies-Congress Book, 396-405.
• Şengün, S. (2014). Dijital avatarlar için semiyotik bir okuma ve avatarların dijital iletişimde belirsizlik azaltma roller [A semiotic reading for digital avatars and the role of avatars in reducing uncertainty in digital communication]. Digital Communication Impact, 34.
• Taddicken, M. (2013). The ‘Privacy paradox’ in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on differentforms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 248–273.
• Taşdelen, B., & Çataldaş, İ. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya ve mahremiyete yönelik görüşleri: Lefke Avrupa Üniversitesi örneği [University students' views on social media and privacy: European University of Lefke case]. Gumushane University Faculty of Communication Electronic Journal,5(2), 826–844.
• Turan, Y. (2015). İletişim araçlarının mahremiyet algısını şekillendirmedeki rolü [The role of communication tools in shaping the perception of privacy]. Paper presented at the Symposium on Perceptions of Privacy in the Context of Religion, Tradition and Ethics, Samsun.
• Warren, S., & Brandies, L. B. (1890). The right to pivacy. Cambridge, MA: Harward Law Review.
• Yabancı, C , Akça, F , Ulutaş, E . (2018). Çevrimiçi Mahremiyet Kaygısı ve Duygusal Zekâ Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi [Investigating the Relationship Between Online Privacy Anxiety and Emotional Intelligence]. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, (54), 191-218. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/connectist/issue/38035/439127
• Yıldırım, F. E. (2016). İnternetten sonra mahremiyet ve bu konudaki çalışmalar üzerine bir inceleme [A review of privacy and studies on the Internet after the Internet.]. Journal of Academic Social Research, 4(33), 568–582.
• Yılmaz, R., Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., Öztürk, H. T., & Karademir, T. (2017). Examining secondary school students’ safe computer and internet usage awareness: An example from Bartın province. Pegem Journal of Education and Training, 7(1), 83-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.004