A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of a cooperative learning model on vocational high school students’ mathematics learning outcomes

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 396 - 421, 01.07.2022

M. Rais Ridwan , Samsul Hadi

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.97.9.4

Cited By: 5

Abstract

Cooperative learning takes place when students work together in small groups to help each other comprehend a subject. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of cooperative learning on vocational high school students’ mathematics learning results compared to those that pertain to conventional learning. Data from 22 research studies, including the sample size, standard deviation, and mean for both the experimental and control groups and other information, were collected using descriptive analysis. The data analysis technique used meta-analysis on forest plots, with analytical techniques including heterogeneity testing, effect size calculation, summary effect calculation using a random-effects model, and identification of publication bias. The results showed that the effectiveness of cooperative learning was 0.89, which gave a medium effect on the mathematics learning outcomes of vocational high school students. The cooperative learning model also provides a measure of higher effectiveness in grade 11 than grade 10 and learning at a sample size of 1-30 students compared to more than 30 students. The effectiveness of cooperative learning on mathematics learning outcomes in the medium effect category, on the other hand, is dependent on grade level variables and sample size. This meta-analysis research provides information to teachers in Indonesia to implement cooperative learning based on the level and number of students in the class to improve the mathematics learning outcomes of vocational high school students.

Keywords

cooperative learning model, mathematics learning outcomes, meta-analysis, funnel plot, publication bias

Thanks

Many thanks to all who assisted researchers. The researcher acknowledges the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia for funding his Ph.D. studies at Yogyakarta State University in Educational Research and Evaluation.

References

• Agustini, K., Wahyuni, D. S., Mertayasa, I. N. E., Wedhanti, N. K., & Sukrawarpala, W. (2021). Student-centered learning models and learning outcomes: Meta-analysis and effect sizes on the students’ thesis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–9.
• Alacapınar, F. G., & Uysal, H. (2020). The effect of cooperative learning in education: A meta-analysis study. Research on Education and Psychology (REP), 4(1), 54–72.
• Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
• Ayu, G., & Gusmania, Y. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Team Assisted Individualization terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v7i2.1319
• Baguma, R., Bagarukayo, E., Namubiru, P., Brown, C., & Mayisela, T. (2019). Using WhatsApp in teaching to develop higher order thinking skills-A literature review using the activity theory lens. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(2), 98–116.
• Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088–1101.
• Bertuccia, A., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Contea, S. (2016). Effect of task and goal interdependence on achievement, cooperation, and support among elementary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 97–105.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
• Cahayati, & Irwan. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Numbered Head Together (NHT) terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa di SMK – SPP Negeri Asahan. Jurnal Mathematics Paedagogic, 2(1), 55–60.
• Capar, G., & Tarim, K. (2015). Efficacy of the cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement and attitude: A meta-analysis research. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 553–559.
• Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education, sixth edition. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Publication.
• Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Cooper, Harris M. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis (A Step by Step Approach) 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Cooper, Harris M. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis, fifth edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Dhema, M., & Wahyuningsih. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe learning together terhadap prestasi belajar matematika pada siswa kelas X SMK Santo Thomas Maumere. BIRUNIMATIKA, 3(3), 1–7.
• Dida, M. Y., Safrudin, N., & Mulyani, S. (2018). Pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Talibura. BIRUNIMATIKA, 3(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v7i2.8269
• Dunir, I. W. (2019). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran dan minat belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika di SMK Negeri Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Mandiri: Ilmu Pengetahuan, Seni, Dan Teknologi, 3(1), 82–98.
• Durlak, J. (1998). Understanding meta-analysis. In Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (L. G. Grim, pp. 319–352). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Ebe, R. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas XI TKR SMK Negeri 2 Baubau Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Akademik, 7(1), 21–31.
• Egger, M., Smith, D. G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629–634.
• Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research result. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Erdogan, S., & Kanık, E. A. (2011). Determination of cut-off values for heterogeneity measurements according to Cochran Q heterogeneity test result in meta-analyses: A simulation study. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Biostatistics, 3(2), 74–83.
• Ernanda, K., Hartanto, S., & Gusmania, Y. (2021). Efektifitas model pembelajaran Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) dengan media Ludo terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa SMK Kolese Tiara Bangsa Batam. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 113–121.
• Febriani, S., Khamalnah, Pebrianti, D. L., & Fahminingsih, I. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah Kajen. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 227–232. Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah: Universita Pekalongan. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v7i1.20
• Fitria, N. A., & Leonard. (2015). Efektifitas penerapan metode pembelajaran Cooperative Script terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 226–231. Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.
• Glass, G. V. (1982). Meta‐analysis: An approach to the synthesis of research results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(2), 93–112.
• Grugnetti, L., & Jaquet, F. (2005). A mathematical competition as a problem solving and a mathematical education experience. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(373–384).
• Hadi, S. (2005). Pendidikan matematika realistik dan implementasinya [Realistic mathematics education and its implementation]. Banjarmasin, Indonesia: Tulip.
• Haller, C. R., Gallagher, V. J., Weldon, T. L., & Felder, R. M. (2000). Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning workgroups. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3), 285–293.
• Hartung, J., Knapp, G., & Sinha, B. K. (2008). Statistical meta-analysis with applications. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
• Hedges, L. V. (1983). A random effects model for effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 388–395.
• Hedges, Larry V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. London: Academic Press.
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560.
• Higgins, J., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558.
• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning & Instruction, 17, 722–738.
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. London, UK: Sage.
• Islami, S., & Yondri, S. (2016). Perbedaan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan konvensional. National Conference of Applied Engineering, Business and Information Technology, 414–421. Padang, Indonesia: Politeknik Negeri Padang.
• Israel, H., & Richter, R. (2011). A guide to understanding meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopedic Sports Physical Therapy, 41(7), 496–504.
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1–26.
• Kalaian, S. A., & Kasim, R. M. (2014). A meta-analytic review of studies of the effectiveness of smallgroup learning methods on statistics achievement. Journal of Statistics Education, 22(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2014.11889691
• Kumar, R. (2017). The effect of collaborative learning on enhancing student achievement: A meta-analysis. Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
• Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149.
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta analysis overview. In Applied Social Research Methods Series. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Mansurah, R., Wahyuningsih, S., Insani, N., & Syaharuddin. (2021). Meta-analisis: model kooperatif two stay two stray terhadap hasil belajar. Jurnal Elementary, 4(2), 97–102.
• Mullen, B., Muellerleile, P., & Bryant, B. (2001). Cumulative meta-analysis: A consideration of indicators of sufficiency and stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1450–1462.
• Mustofa, & Yuwana, H. S. (2016). The development of appreciation learning model of indonesia literature based critical discourse analysis to improve the students’ critical thinking skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(33), 166–175.
• Natalia, & Leonard. (2015). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization terhadap hasil hasil belajar matematika pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Darul Ma’ Arif Jakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 203–210. Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.
• Parveen, Q., Yousuf, M. I., & Mustafa, S. (2017). An experimental study on the effect of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement and students’ perceptions towards cooperative learning. The Anthropologist, 27(1–3), 69–76.
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Rahayu, E., Murni, A., & Sakur. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan teknik Kancing Gemerincing dalam pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas X SMK Kesehatan Pro-skill Indonesia. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 4(1), 1–12.
• Ramadhani, K., & Azis, Z. (2020). Efektivitas model pembelajaran Tipe Team Assisted (TAI) terhadap hasil belajar matematika pada siswa SMK PAB 2 Helvetia Medan T.P 2019/2020. Journal Mathematics Education Sigma (JMES), 1(1), 34–40.
• Rattanatumma, T., & Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of STAD model and problem based learning in mathematics learning achievement and problem solving ability. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 194–199.
• Retnawati, H., Apino, E., Kartianom, Djidu, H., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Pengantar meta analisis [Introduction to meta-analysis]. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
• Rodzalan, S. A., & Saat, M. (2015). The perception of critical thinking and problem-solving skill among malaysian undergraduate students. Procedia-Social Behaviour Science, 17(2), 25–32.
• Rosenberg, M., Adams, D., & Gurevitch, J. (2000). MetaWin statistical software for meta-analysis version 2.0. Massachusetts, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
• Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (revised ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
• Saborit, J. A., Fernandez-Rıo, J., Cecchini, J. A., Mendez-Gimenez, A., & Alonso, D. (2016). Teachers’ attitude and perception towards cooperative learning implementation: Influence of continuing training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 438–445.
• San, I., & Kis, A. (2018). Effect of traditional methods in geometry and numbers learning domains on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 544–554. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.428950
• Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators’ perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309–327.
• Saragih, E. M. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran learning starts with a question terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa pada materi matriks kelas X SMK-SPP Negeri Asahan Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Dialog, 8(2), 848–854.
• Setiana, D. S., Ili, L., Rumasoreng, M. I., & Prabowo, A. (2020). Relationship between Cooperative learning method and students’ mathematics learning achievement: A meta-analysis correlation. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 145–158.
• Setiawan, N. D., Susilowati, D., & Farahsanti, I. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Numbered Heads Together terhadap prestasi belajar ditinjau dari kemampuan awal. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Sosial, Dan Agama, 6(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.53565/pssa.v6i2.196
• Setyawan, A., & Leonard. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 736–745. Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Indraprasta PGRI. Retrieved from http://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/repository/article/view/1952
• Sharan, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning for academic and social gains: Valued pedagogy, problematic practice. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 300–313.
• Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
• Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
• Slavin, R. E. (1989). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52–54.
• Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M. B., & Madden, N. A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 409–422.
• Slavin, Robert E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 647–663.
• Smets, W., & Struyven, K. (2018). Realist review of literature on catering for different instructional needs with preteaching and extended instruction. Education Sciences, 8(113), 1–8.
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–52. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170643
• Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433–454.
• Sudirman. (2015). Pengaruh model belajar aktif tipe Giving Question and Getting Answer (GQGA) terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Gema Wiralodra, 6(1), 1–6.
• Sultana, N., Yousuf, M. I., Din, M. N. U., & Rehman, S. (2011). The higher the quality of teaching the higher the quality of education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 2(3), 59–64.
• Sumiati, & Sumartono. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Teams Games Tournament (TGT) terhadap hasil belajar matriks (studi kasus pada siswa kelas X-G program keahlian RPL SMK Senopati Sedati Sidoarjo). Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath: Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25139/sm.v5i1.452
• Surian, A., & Damini, M. (2014). “Becoming” a cooperative learner-teacher. Anales De Psicologı´a [Annals Of Psychology], 30(3), 808–817.
• Suryani, P., Agustyaningrum, N., & Hasibuan, N. H. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Teams Games Touraments dengan permainan monopoli terhadap hasil belajar matematika di SMK Kolese Tiara Bangsa. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v8i2.2011
• Thifal, R. F., Sujadi, A. A., & Arigiyati, T. A. (2020). Efektivitas model pembelajaran Jigsaw terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa SMK. UNION: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3057
• Turgut, S., & Turgut, I. G. (2018). The effects of cooperative learning on mathematics achievement in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.12973/IJI.2018.11345A
• Vega, M. L., & Hederich, C. (2015). The impact of a cooperative learning program on the academic achievement in mathematics and language in fourth grade students and its relation to cognitive style. New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(2), 84–90.
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John - Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
• Wahyuningsih, T., Rezeki, S., & Zetriuslita. (2013). Perbandingan hasil belajar matematika siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran langsung dengan pembelajaran kooperatif. Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 52–63.
• Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., Aoyama, K., & Sugiman. (2019). Diagnosing students’ learning difficulties in the eyes of Indonesian mathematics teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(7), 357–364.
• Wulandari, F., & Leonard. (2015). Pengaruh metode pembelajaran Example Non Example terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 106–110. Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Indraprasta PGRI. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321824081
• Zulkardi. (2002). Development a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers. University of Twente.