Controversial issues: A mixed study with middle school students

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 1 - 18, 01.07.2022

Durdane Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.1.9.4

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to determine the opinions of middle school students about the inclusion of controversial issues in social studies course. In this mixed methods study, an explanatory design was used, and the participants involved middle school students studying in Kırşehir, Osmaniye, and Diyarbakır provinces of Turkey during the 2020-2021 academic year. The quantitative data were collected using the “Student Questionnaire for Controversial Issues” while the qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 25 and the qualitative data were analyzed through MAXQDA 20. In the analysis of quantitative data, descriptive statistics (percentage, frequency, mean, standard deviation) and t-test and one-way analysis of variance/ANOVA were used since the data had normal distribution. Tukey test was administered to determine between which groups the difference existed. In the qualitative phase, audio-recorded interviews were converted into Word files, then analyzed and divided into meaningful codes. Four themes emerged by combining the codes in common categories. As a result of the research, it was found that the controversial topics that the students wanted to be included in the social studies course the most were human rights and violence. Whilst the subject of terrorism was determined as the subject that the students did not want to be included in the lesson in the quantitative dimension, it was determined that there were different opinions among the students regarding including the subject of terrorism in the qualitative dimension. It was also found that participants’ opinions about the inclusion of controversial issues differed in terms of gender, grade level, the city they live in, and reading habits. The reason why all of the students wanted controversial topics to be included in the course was to learn about controversial issues and to raise their awareness of these issues

Keywords

social studies, controversial issues, mixed mehod

References

• Akkaş, İ., & Uyanık, Z. (2016). Violence against women. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Unıversity Journal of ISS. 6(1), 32-42.
• Bailey, C. (1975). “Neutrality and Rationality in Teaching”. D. Bridges & P. Scrimshaw (Eds), Values and Authority in Schools. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
• Barton, K., & McCully, A. (2007). Teaching controversial issues... where controversial issues really matter. Teaching history, (127), 13.
• Berg, W., Graeffe, L., & Holden, C. (2003). Teaching controversial issues: A European perspective. Children's Identity and Citizenship in Europe, CiCe.
• Bilgili, A. S. (2013). Geçmişten günümüze sosyal bilimler ve sosyal bilgiler [Social sciences and social studies from past to present]. Sosyal bilgilerin temelleri [Fundamentals of social studies] (Ed. A. S. Bilgili). (pp.2-35). Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Cakmak, E. K., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Camicia, S. P. (2008). Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum controversy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 36(4), 298-316.
• Camicia, S. P., & Dobson, D. (2010). Learning how to respond to current events: Partner journals between US preservice teachers and children. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 576-582.
• Chikoko, V., Gilmour, J. D., Harber, C., & Serf, J. (2011). Teaching controversial issues and teacher education in England and South Africa. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 5-19.
• Clabough, J., Philpott, S., McConkey, L. & Turner, T.N., (2011). Teachers’ struggles with controversial ıssues: Facing the demon. National Social Science Journal, 38(2), 1-5.
• Copur, A., & Demirel, M. (2016). Turkish social studies teachers’ thoughts about the teaching of controversial issues. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 15(2), 80-95.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
• Dearden, R. F. (1981). Controversial issues and the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 37-44.
• Ersoy, A. F. (2010). Social studies teacher candidates' views on the controversial issues incorporated into their courses in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 323-334.
• Ersoy, A. F. (2013). Factors affecting the participation of social studies teacher candidates in discussions on controversial ıssues. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 4(1), 24-57.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A. Simple study guide and reference. (10. Baskı). GEN, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc, 2010.
• Günal, H., & Kaya. R., (2016). Problems and drawbacks that history teachers experience while teaching controversial and sensitive issues (Erzurum sample). Turkish History Education Journal, 5(1), 44-73.
• Harwood, A. M., & Hahn, C. L. (1990). Controversial issues in the classroom. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
• Hess, D. (2001). Teaching students to discuss controversial public issues. ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education, Indiana University.
• Hess, D. (2005). How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues. Social Education, 69(1), 47-48.
• Hess, D. E. (2004). Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37(2), 257-261.
• Hess, D., & Posselt, J. (2002). How High School Students Experience and Learn from the Discussion of Controversial Public Issues. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 17(4), 283-314.
• Küçükkaragöz, H. (2007). Bilişsel gelişim ve dil gelişimi [Cognitive development and language development]. Eğitim psikolojisi [In education psychology] (Ed. B. Yeşilyaprak).(pp. 81-115). Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
• Kuş, Z. (2015). Science and social studies teachers’ beliefs and practices about teaching controversial issues: Certain comparisons. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education, 84-97.
• Lockwood, A. L. (1995). Controversial Issues: The Teacher's Crucial Role. Social Education, 60(1), 28-31.
• McCully, A. (2006). Practitioner perceptions of their role in facilitating the handling of controversial issues in contested societies: A Northern Irish experience. Educational review, 58(1), 51-65.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Miller, H. L., & Flores, D. (2011). Teaching controversial issues, liberally. Effective College and University Teaching: Strategies and Tactics for the New Professoriate, 155.
• Ministry Of National Education, (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı. [Social studies course curriculum] Retrieved from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr on 13.04.2021.
• Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues‐teachers' attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford review of education, 30(4), 489-507.
• Oxfam GB. (2006). Global Citizenship Guides, Teaching Controversial Issues. Retrieved from http://www.worldwiseschools.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Oxfam-Teaching-Controversial-Issues.pdf on 15.07.2021
• Ozturk, D., & Kus, Z. (2019). Social studies teachers' opinions and practices regarding teaching controversial issues. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 44(8), 15-37.
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. [QCA] (1998) Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools Final report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
• Soley, M. (1996). If it's controversial, why teach it? Social Education, 60(1), 9-14.
• Stradling, R. (1984). The teaching of controversial issues: an evaluation. Educational Review, 36(2), 121-129.
• Tuncer, R, H. (2018). Examining social studies teacher candidates' opinions about teaching controversial subjects. Fırat University Institute of Educational Science Department of Turkish and Social Sciences Education Department of Social Sciences Education Elazığ.
• Uygun, K., & Arslan, I. E. (2020). Students' opinions about teaching of the controversial topics in the social studies classes. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 335-344.
• Washington, E. Y., & Humphries, E. K. (2011). A social studies teacher's sense making of controversial issues discussions of race in a predominantly white, rural high school classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(1), 92-114.
• Yazıcı, S., & Seçgin, F. (2010). A study on teachıng controversıal ıssues. Journal Of International Social Research, 3(12).
• Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Yılmaz, K. (2012). Investıgatıon ınto controversıal ıssues and taboo topıcs: socıal studıes teachers' perspectıves. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 9(18), 201-225.