A sample STEM activity based on the engineering design process: A study on prospective preschool teachers’ views

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 86 - 105, 30.01.2023

Canay Pekbay

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.5.10.1

Abstract

This research aimed to introduce a STEM activity specifically prepared in accordance with the engineering design process and to examine a group of prospective preschool teachers’ views about the activity. A total of 16 prospective teachers studying in the final year of a public university in the West Black Sea Region, Turkey, during the fall semester of the 2021/22 academic year were the participants of the study. The STEM activity was based on the problem of making a fish model that can sink, swim and float in water. At the end of the activity, an open-ended activity opinion form was used to gather the prospective teachers’ views about the activity. The data were analyzed using the descriptive analysis method by taking into consideration the themes related to STEM, as specified in the theoretical framework. The results of the study show that the prospective teachers took the opportunity to experience how a STEM activity is held, that they found the activity fun and interesting, as well as conducive to learning science concepts and higher-order thinking skills. As for the negative aspects of the activity, the respondents stated that the activity was time-consuming, and that it was difficult to decide on and build the design. We believe that this study will provide theoretical and practical contributions to both researchers and preschool teachers.

Keywords

engineering design process, prospective preschool teachers, STEM education

References

• Aldemir, J., & Kermani, H. (2017). Integrated STEM curriculum: Improving educational outcomes for head start children. Early Child Development and Care, 187(11), 1694–1706.
• Aladé, F., Lauricella, A. R., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Wartella, E. (2016). Measuring with Murray: Touchscreen technology and pre-schoolers’ STEM learning. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62, 433–441.
• Atiles, J. T., Jones, J. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2013). More than a Read-Aloud: Preparing and Inspiring Early Childhood Teachers to Develop our Future Scientists. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 285-299.
• Baigiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128.
• Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8-15.
• Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi Press.
• Cantrell, Pekcan, Itani, & Velasquez-Bryant, 2006 Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & Velasquez-Bryant, N. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301-309
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, Science, and Technology in the Early Grades. The Future of Children, 26(2), 75–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43940582
• Corbett, K. S., & Coriell, J. M. (2014). STEM explore, discover, apply – A middle school elective (curriculum exchange). ASEE Annual Conference. Indianapolis, Indiana. January 2014. [Online: https://peer.asee.org/23034]
• Çiftçi, A. & Topçu, M. S. (2021). Mental models and opinions of pre-service preschool teachers about STEM education. Journal of National Education, 50(231), 41-65.
• Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-84.
• DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P. W., & Reid, E. E. 2007. Kindergarten predictors of mathematical growth in the primary grades: An investigation using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Kindergarten cohort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 369.
• Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. Int J Technol Des Educ, 19, 55–65.
• EİE (Engineering is Elementary) (2013). Here comes the sun: Engineering insulated homes. United States of America: Museum of Science.
• Erdogan, I., & Ciftci, A. (2017). Investigating the views of pre-service science teachers on STEM education practices. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(5), 1055-1065.
• Early Childhood STEM Working Group. (2017). Early STEM Matters: Providing High-Quality STEM Experiences for All Young Learners. Policy report. Chicago, IL: UChicago STEM Education; Chicago: Erikson Institute.
• Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2016). Ideas of Science Teachers took STEM Education about STEM based Activities. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education (JOQRE), 4(3), 43-67.
• Felix, A. L., Bandstra, J. Z., & Strosnider, W. H. J. (2010, March). Design-Based science for STEM student recruitment and teacher professional development. MidAtlantic American Society for Engineering Education Conference. Philadelphia.
• Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw Hill.
• Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August 1). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer [Conference presentation]. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington. http://steamwise.io/docs/congressional-research-service-R42642.pdf
• Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., & Hammer, D. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=ncete_publications
• Jamali, S. M., Md Zain, A. N., Samsudin, M. A., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2017). Self-efficacy, scientific reasoning, and learning achievement in the STEM project-based learning literature. The Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2, 29-43.7
• Johnson, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing integrated STEM education. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 367–368.
• Kahraman, E. & Doğan, A. (2020). Opinions of middle school students about STEM activities. Anatolian Journal of Teacher, 4(1), 1-20.
• Kaya, G., & Avan, Ç. (2020). An inquiry-based science activity: Floating-sinking-staying between the surface and bottom. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 10(2), 112-126.
• Locuniak, M. N., & Jordan, N. C. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 451–459.
• Malone, K. L., Tiarani, V., Irving, K. E., Kajfez, R., Lin, H., Giasi, T., & Edminston, B. W. (2018). Engineering design challenges in early childhood education: Effects on student cognition and interest. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 11.
• Milford, T. & Tippet, C. (2015). The Design and Validation of an Early Childhood STEM Classroom Observational Protocol. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 6(1), 24.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
• Miller, T. (2018). Developing numeracy skills using interactive technology in play-based learning environment. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–11.
• Moomaw, S., & Davis, J. A. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. YC Young Children, 65(5), 12.
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 2lst century skills: A workshop summary. National Academies Press.
• Özçakır- Sümen, Ö. & Çalışıcı, H. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ mind maps and opinions on STEM education implemented in an environmental literacy course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 459-476.
• Parno, Yuliati, L., Munfaridah, N., Ali, M., Rosyidah, F. U. N., & Indrasari, N. (2020, April). The effect of project based learning-STEM on problem solving skills for students in the topic of electromagnetic induction. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(2), 022025.
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). P21 framework definitions. [Online: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 25 July 2016.
• Pekbay, C. & Yılmaz-Tığılı, N. (2021). Barbie Bungee Jumping: An Example STEM Activity. Gazi Journal of Education Sciences, 7(3), 261-288.
• Ring, E. A. (2017). Teacher Conceptions of Integrated STEM Education and How They Are Reflected in Integrated STEM Curriculum Writing and Classroom Implementation (Order No. 10283633). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1936066225). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/teacher-conceptions-integrated-stem-education-how/docview/1936066225/se-2?accountid=17396
• Riskowski, J. L., Todd, C. D., Wee, B., Dark, M., ve Harbor, J. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary water resources engineering module in an eighth grade science course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 181-195.
• Riniker, C. M. (2021). The Impact of Utilizing Learning Centers to Promote STEM The Impact of Utilizing Learning Centers to Promote STEM Development in the Early Childhood Classroom. Master's Theses & Capstone Projects, 311.
• Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 1-4.
• Schnittka, C. G., Bell, R. L., & Richards, L. G. (2010). Save the penguins: Teaching the science of heat transfer through engineering design. ScienceScope, 34(3), 82-91.
• Simoncini, K., & Lasen, M. (2018). Ideas about STEM among Australian early childhood professionals: How important is STEM in early childhood education? International Journal of Early Childhood, 50(3), 353–369.
• Suchman, E. L. (2014). Changing academic culture to improve undergraduate STEM education. Trends in Microbiology, 22(12), 657-659.
• Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Dancing robots: Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore ‘s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28 (2), 325–346.
• Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). After school activities about Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics and its effect on students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 297-322.
• Tank, K. M., Rynearson, A. M., & Moore, T. J. (2018). Examining student and teacher talk within engineering design in kindergarten. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 10.
• Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 631-651.
• Tippett, C. D., & Milford, T. M. (2017). Findings from a pre-kindergarten classroom: Making the case for STEM in early childhood education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 67–86.
• Uğraş, M. & Genç, Z. (2018). Investigating Preschool Teacher Candidates' STEM Teaching Intention and the views about STEM Education. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(2), 724-744.
• Ültay, N. & Ültay, E. (2020). A comparative investigation of the views of preschool teachers and teacher candidates about STEM. Journal of Science Learning, 3(2), 67-78.
• Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., & Malone, J. (2000). Bridging the boundaries of compartmentalized knowledge: Student learning in an integrated environment. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), 23-25.
• Wagner, T. (2008). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20-24.
• Yıldırım, B. (2020). Preschool STEM Activities: Preschool Teachers’ Preparation and Views. Early Childhood Education Journal (Published Online) DOI: 10.1007/s10643-020-01056-2
• Yıldırım, B. Preschool STEM Activities: Preschool Teachers’ Preparation and Views. Early Childhood Educ J 49, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01056-2
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Publishing of Seçkin.